This article aims to augment collective understandings of the ethical complexities of qualitative research, and to encourage more attention to the actual practices of interviewing than has usually been paid in discussions in this area. Drawing on interview transcripts, we offer an analysis of the ways vulnerability may be produced for research participants by the intersection of interview factors (an interview strategy, the interviewer’s presence, a line of questioning) with particular discursive and political surrounds. This conceptualization of the conditions of interviewee vulnerability prompts a revisioning of the power that researchers bring to, and exercise in, interviews. In reflecting on interactions with research participants we describe our efforts to use our power wittingly and responsibly.
Armstrong, D.
(1987) ‘Silence and Truth in Death and Dying’, Social Science and Medicine24: 651-657.
2.
Armstrong, P.
and Armstrong, H. (1999) Women, Privatization and Health Care Reform: The Ontario Scan. Toronto: National Network on Environments and Women’s Health, York University.
3.
Aronson, J.
(2002) ‘Frail and Disabled Users of Home Care: Confident Consumers or Disentitled Citizens?’, Canadian Journal on Aging21(1): 11-25.
4.
Aronson, J.
and Neysmith, S. (2001) ‘Manufacturing Social Exclusion in the Home Care Market’, Canadian Public PolicyXXVII: 151-165.
5.
Bartky, S.L.
(1990) Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.
6.
Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women (CRIAW)
(1996) Feminist Research Ethics: A Process. Ottawa: CRIAW.
7.
Clark, D.
and Seymour, J. (1999) Reflections on Palliative Care: Sociological and Policy Perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
8.
Coffey, A.
(1999) The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. London: Sage.
9.
Cotterill, P.
(1992) ‘Interviewing Women: Issues of Friendship, Vulnerability, and Power’, Women’s Studies International Forum15(5/6): 593-606.
10.
Denzin, N.
(2001) ‘The Reflexive Interview and a Performative Social Science’, Qualitative Research1(1): 23-46.
11.
Finch, J.
(1984) ‘“It’s Great to Have Someone to Talk To”: The Ethics and Politics of Interviewing Women’, in B. Colin and H. Roberts (eds) Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, pp. 70-87. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12.
Foote, C.
and Frank, A. (1999) ‘Foucault and Therapy: The Disciplining of Grief’, in A. Chambon, A. Irving and L. Epstein (eds) Reading Foucault for Social Work, pp. 156-187. New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Government of Canada
(2000) Quality End-of-Life Care: The Right of Every Canadian. Ottawa: Subcommittee to update ‘Of Life and Death’ of the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology.
14.
Heilbrun, C.
(1998) Writing a Woman’s Life. New York: Ballantine Books.
15.
Hey, V.
(1999) ‘Frail Elderly People: Difficult Questions and Awkward Answers’, in S. Hood, B. Mayall and S. Oliver (eds) Critical Issues in Social Research: Power and Prejudice, pp. 94-110. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16.
Holstein, J.A.
and Gubrium, J.F. (1997) ‘Active Interviewing’, in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 113-129. London: Sage.
17.
Holt, E.
(1993) ‘ The Structure of Death Announcements: Look On the Bright Side of Death’, Text13(2): 189-212.
18.
Hutchinson, S.
and Wilson, H. (1994) ‘Research and Therapeutic Interviews: A Poststructuralist Perspective’, in J.M. Morse (ed.) Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, pp. 300-315. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Kaplan Daniels, A.
(1983) ‘Self-Deception and Self-Discovery in Fieldwork’, Qualitative Sociology6(3): 195-214.
20.
Katz, S.
(2000) ‘Busy Bodies: Activity Aging and the Management of Everyday Life’, Journal of Aging Studies4(2): 135-152.
21.
Lather, P.
(1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Post Modern. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
22.
Lawton, J.
(1998) ‘Contemporary Hospice Care: The Sequestration of the Unbounded Body and “Dirty Dying”’, Sociology of Health & Illness20(2): 121-143.
23.
Maguire, P.
(1987) Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Amherst, MA: Centre for International Education.
24.
Munhall, P.
(1989) ‘Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research’, Western Journal of Nursing Research31(3): 178-181.
25.
Oakley, A.
(1981) ‘Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’, in H. Roberts (ed.) Doing Feminist Research, pp. 30-61. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26.
Renzetti, C.M.
and Lee, R.M. (1993) Researching Sensitive Topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Rubin, H.J.
and Rubin, I.S. (1995) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Seale, C.
(1995) ‘Dying alone’, Sociology of Health and Illness17(3): 376-392.
29.
Sinding, C.
(in press) ‘Disarmed Complaints: Unpacking Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care’, Social Science and Medicine.
30.
Sinding, C.
(submitted) ‘Expanded Responsibilities, Diminished Entitlements: Informal Caregivers Providing and Securing Health Care in Hospitals and Cancer Centres’.
31.
Stacey, J.
(1991) ‘Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?’, in D. Patai and S.B. Gluck (eds) Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History, pp. 111-119. New York: Routledge.
32.
Tulle-Winton, E.
(1999) ‘Growing Old and Resistance: Towards a New Cultural Economy of Old Age?’, Ageing and Society19(3): 281-299.
33.
Twigg, J.
(2000) Bathing - The Body and Community Care. London: Routledge.
34.
Walter, T.
(1996) ‘Facing Death Without Tradition’, in G. Howarth and P.C. Jupp (eds) Contemporary Issues in the Sociology of Death, Dying and Disposal, pp. 193-204. London: Macmillan.
35.
Wilkinson, S.
and Kitzinger, C. (2000) ‘Thinking Differently About Thinking Positive: A Discursive Approach to Cancer Patients’ Talk’, Social Science & Medicine50(1): 797-811.
