This study investigated the performance and emission behavior of a spark-ignition (SI) engine fueled with a novel four-component hybrid blend comprising 40% gasoline, 20% ethanol, 20% biogas, and 20% hydrogen, and optimized the operating parameters using a cubic Response Surface Methodology (RSM) framework. Unlike earlier works limited to binary or ternary blends, this research introduced a synergistic fuel mixture that combined the high flame speed of hydrogen, the oxygenated combustion of ethanol, and the renewable carbon fraction of biogas. Experimental tests were conducted on a spark ignition engine across a wide range of inlet pressures (0.75–1.5 bar), compression ratios (8–11), and engine speeds (1000–4000 rpm). Performance (BP, BTE, BSFC) and emission parameters (CO, CO2, NOx, HC) were modeled using RSM, and all regression models exhibited excellent adequacy (R2 > 0.97), confirming strong predictive strength. The best working conditions were 1.5 bar inlet pressure, 10.9 compression ratio and 3330 rpm. These conditions provided the maximum brake power (35.37 kW), brake thermal efficiency (25.89%), and the minimum BSFC (0.33 kg/kWh). Oxidation occurred at a faster pace with hydrogen and ethanol, and the speed at which flames propagated also increased, which reduced the emissions of CO and HC significantly. Nevertheless, the increase in the NO emissions increased slightly at higher temperatures. The integrated optimization produced a desirability index of 0.779, which showed that it was a good balance between improving efficiency and controlling emissions. The study showed that a hydrogen-assisted gasoline–ethanol–biogas blend burned steadily and without knocking, with better performance and less pollution. This showed that there is a way to run SI engines cleaner and more sustainably.
FayyazbakhshABellMLZhuX, et al. Engine emissions with air pollutants and greenhouse gases and their control technologies. J Clean Prod2022; 376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134260
4.
SharmaMNRDasappaS. Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: status and challenges. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2016; 60: 450–463.
5.
SinghRKrishnaBBMishraG, et al. Strategies for selection of thermo-chemical processes for the valorisation of biomass. Renew Energy2016; 98: 226–237.
6.
SiddiquiHThenganeSKSharmaS, et al. Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock. Bioresour Technol2018; 266: 220–231.
7.
RajRSinghDKTirkeyJV. Gasifier-engine performance analysis using Co-gasification of mahua wood waste and saw-dust briquette blend: an experimental and optimization approach. Biomass Convers Biorefinery2024; 14: 22273–22296.
8.
RollinsonANOladejoJM. ‘Patented blunderings’, efficiency awareness, and self-sustainability claims in the pyrolysis energy from waste sector. Resour Conserv Recycl2019; 141: 233–242.
9.
Solferini de CarvalhoFPeñaranda MendozaARibeiro dos SantosL, et al. Experimental study of the methane and producer gas blends in an optical spark ignition engine: combustion characteristics, thermodynamics and emissions. Int J Engine Res2023; 24(6): 2708–2726. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874221131117
10.
SattarzadehMEbrahimiMJazayeriSA. Maximum reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by complete replacement of natural gas with pure hydrogen as a sole low reactive fuel in a RCCI engine. Int J Engine Res2023; 24(6): 2677–2691. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874221128353
11.
IafrateNMatratMZaccardiJ-M. Numerical investigations on hydrogen-enhanced combustion in ultra-lean gasoline spark-ignition engines. Int J Engine Res2021; 22(2): 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087419870688
12.
RajRKumar SinghDVachan TirkeyJ. Performance simulation and optimization of SI engine fueled with peach biomass-based producer gas and propane blend. Therm Sci Eng Prog2023; 41: 101816.
13.
PrandoDShivananda AilSChiaramontiD, et al. Characterisation of the producer gas from an open top gasifier: Assessment of different tar analysis approaches. Fuel2016; 181: 566–572.
14.
WiyonoAGandidiIMBermanET, et al. Design, development and testing of integrated downdraft gasifier and multi IGCS system of MSW for remote areas. Case Stud Therm Eng2020; 20: 100612.
15.
BandgarPSJainSPanwarNL. A comprehensive review on optimization of anaerobic digestion technologies for lignocellulosic biomass available in India. Biomass Bioenergy2022; 161: 106479.
16.
MamunMRAToriiStoriiS. Anaerobic co-digestion of biodegradable biomass for biomethane generation. J Jpn Inst Energ2015; 94(6): 588–593.
17.
KapoorRGhoshPTyagiB, et al. Advances in biogas valorization and utilization systems: a comprehensive review. J Clean Prod2020; 273: 123052.
18.
TamangPTyagiVKGunjyalN, et al. Free nitrous acid (FNA) pretreatment enhances biomethanation of lignocellulosic agro-waste (wheat straw). Energy2023; 264: 126249.
19.
DeepanrajBSivasubramanianVJayarajS. Multi-response optimization of process parameters in biogas production from food waste using Taguchi – Grey relational analysis. Energy Convers Manag2017; 141: 429–438.
20.
ObaideenKAbdelkareemMAWilberforceT, et al. Biogas role in achievement of the sustainable development goals: evaluation, challenges, and guidelines. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2022; 131: 104207.
21.
ZabedHMAkterSYunJ, et al. Biogas from microalgae: technologies, challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2020; 117: 109503.
22.
WuDPengXLiL, et al. Commercial biogas plants: review on operational parameters and guide for performance optimization. Fuel2021; 303: 121282.
23.
LiuCWachemoACTongH, et al. Biogas production and microbial community properties during anaerobic digestion of corn stover at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol2018; 261: 93–103.
24.
TumusiimeEKirabiraJBMusinguziWB. Long-life performance of biogas systems for productive applications: the role of R&D and policy. Energy Rep2019; 5: 579–583.
25.
IshaqHDincerICrawfordC. A review on hydrogen production and utilization: Challenges and opportunities. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47(62): 26238–26264.
26.
SharmaGDewanganAKYadavAK, et al. Current status of research on hydrogen generation, storage and transportation technologies: A state-of-the-art review towards sustainable energy. Process Saf Environ Prot2024; 191: 1445–1460.
27.
AlgayyimSJMSalehKWandelAP, et al. Influence of natural gas and hydrogen properties on internal combustion engine performance, combustion, and emissions: a review. Fuel2024; 362: 130844.
28.
KhanOAlsaduniIParvezM, et al. Role of hydrogen-enrichment on performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fuelled with metal oxide nanoparticles added biodiesel/diesel blends: a combined neuro fuzzy-Gaussian mixture model analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 93: 1113–1126.
29.
ZareeiJKakaeeAH. Study and the effects of ignition timing on gasoline engine performance and emissions. Eur Transp Res Rev2013; 5: 109–116.
30.
ZhuDWuHLeeT, et al. Effects of the turbocharged Miller cycle strategy on the performance improvement and emission characteristics of diesel engines. Environ Pollut2024; 346: 123587.
31.
TeohYHHowHGLeTD, et al. A review on production and implementation of hydrogen as a green fuel in internal combustion engines. Fuel2023; 333: 126525.
32.
Solferini de CarvalhoFRufinoCHMalheiro de OliveiraE, et al. Experimental investigation of hydrogen-producer gas mixtures in an optically accessible SI engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 58: 500–513.
33.
ZhangMChangMWangJ, et al. Flame dynamics analysis of highly hydrogen-enrichment premixed turbulent combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45(1): 1072–1083.
34.
JiCWangS. Experimental study on combustion and emissions characteristics of a spark ignition engine fueled with gasoline−hydrogen blends. Energy Fuels2009; 23(6): 2930–2936.
35.
VermaGPrasadRKAgarwalRA, et al. Experimental investigations of combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a hydrogen enriched natural gas fuelled prototype spark ignition engine. Fuel2016; 178: 209–217.
36.
SagarSMVAgarwalAK. Experimental investigation of varying composition of HCNG on performance and combustion characteristics of a SI engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2017; 42(18): 13234–13244.
37.
NavaleSJKulkarniRRThipseSS. An experimental study on performance, emission and combustion parameters of hydrogen fueled spark ignition engine with the timed manifold injection system. Int J Hydrogen Energy2017; 42(12): 8299–8309.
38.
ShivaprasadKChitragarPKumarG. Effect of hydrogen addition on combustion and emission characteristics of high-speed spark ignition engine-an experimental study. SAE technical paper 0148-71912015.
39.
YilmazİTaştanM. Investigation of hydrogen addition to methanol-gasoline blends in an SI engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2018; 43(44): 20252–20261.
40.
SimsekSUsluSSimsekH. Experimental study on the ability of different biogas level dual fuel spark ignition engine: emission mitigation, performance, and combustion analysis. Oil Gas Sci Technol2021; 76: 74.
41.
PorpathamERameshANagalingamB. Effect of spark timing on the performance of a spark ignition engine running on biogas–hydrogen blends. Biofuels2017; 8(6): 635–642.
42.
BundeleHKurienCVarmaPS, et al. Experimental and computational study on the enhancement of engine characteristics by hydrogen enrichment in a biogas fuelled spark ignition engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47(71): 30671–30686.
43.
PandeyVShahapurkarKGuluwadiS, et al. Studies on the performance of engines powered with hydrogen-enriched biogas. Energies2023; 16(11): 4349.
44.
RamNKSinghNRRamanP, et al. Experimental study on performance analysis of an internal combustion engine operated on hydrogen-enriched producer gas from the air–steam gasification. Energy2020; 205: 118029.
45.
ShivapujiAMDasappaS. Influence of fuel hydrogen fraction on syngas fueled SI engine: Fuel thermo-physical property analysis and in-cylinder experimental investigations. Int J Hydrogen Energy2015; 40(32): 10308–10328.
