Recent years have shown Porsche Synthetic Fuels (POSYN) as one promising and quick solution to be used in both existing and new-generation internal combustion engines (ICEs) to immediately contrast the CO2 emissions. Nevertheless, to make these fuels efficient and effective for ICE applications, extensive testing is needed to evaluate the fuel performance and its impact on tailpipe emissions; numerical simulations (both 1D and 3D) can provide relevant support to reach the target in a faster and economically feasible way, providing guidelines for the design of eFuels and their use. An accurate and reliable modeling framework, able to mimic the chemical and physical characteristics of the fuels for a given set of operating conditions, is therefore mandatory to support the development process. The definition of a fuel surrogate is crucial to integrate the relevant properties in the 3D-CFD modeling framework. In this work, a methodology for the calculation of LFS (Laminar Flame Speed) and IDT (Ignition Delay Time) of different fuels is developed and applied to compare the characteristics of two different POSYN fuels with a conventional RON 98 gasoline by using 0D/1D detailed chemical kinetics simulations. The methodology relies on a proper definition of the composition of a six-component fuel surrogate and on the critical selection from the literature of a suitable chemical kinetics mechanism. The methodology is then applied to calculate IDTs and LFSs on a wide set of engine-relevant conditions, allowing for comparing the fuels’ behavior, paving the way for more detailed 1D and 3D-CFD studies. Finally, the LFS calculations of free-aromatics gasoline showed a faster flame speed in a range between 3% and 6% compared to the conventional one at engine-like conditions. Instead, IDTs, according to similarities in RON/MON, showed overall similar output and peculiar NTC behavior when MTBE is present.
Bill Visnic. Europe steps back from 2035 ICE ban, 28March2023.
9.
KalghatgiG.Is it the end of combustion and engine combustion research? Should it be?Transp Eng2022; 10: 100142.
10.
SenecalPKLeachF.Diversity in transportation: Why a mix of propulsion technologies is the way forward for the future fleet. Results in Engineering2019; 4: 100060.
11.
UchidaNOnoratiANovellaR, et al. E-fuels in IC engines: A key solution for a future decarbonized transport. Int J Engine Res2025; 26: 1675–1702.
12.
European Alternative Fuels Observatory. European Alternative Fuels Observatory dataset, data.europa.eu (2025).
EIA. Eliminating MTBE in gasoline 2006. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 22February2006.
18.
WallaceGBlondyJMirabellaW, et al. Ethyl tertiary butyl ether – a review of the technical literature. Society of Automotive Engineers. Technical paper 2009-01-1951, 2009. Referring to e.g. Tanaka et al. SAE technical paper 2006-01-3382; Tanaka et al. SAE technical paper 2007-01-4005
Porsche Newsroom. Premiere for the Porsche Mobil 1 Supercup with eFuels. Porsche Newsroom, 2024.
22.
Formula 1®. How sustainable fuels can benefit the world – and are more than just the future of F1. Formula 1®, 2024.
23.
TotalEnergies. All 24 hours of Le Mans race cars to use 100% renewable fuel produced by totalenergies, 2022, https://www.totalenergies.com
24.
IaccarinoSBredaSD’AdamoA, et al. Numerical simulation and flame analysis of combustion and knock in a DISI optically accessible research engine. SAE Int J Engines2017; 10(2): 576–592.
25.
BredaSD’AdamoAFontanesiS, et al. Numerical simulation of gasoline and n-butanol combustion in an optically accessible research engine. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2017; 10(1): 32–55.
26.
SfrisoSBerniFBredaS, et al. Proposal and validation of 3D-CFD framework for ultra-lean hydrogen combustion in ICEs. SAE technical paper 2024-01-2685, 2024. DOI: 10.4271/2024-01-2685
27.
BredaSD'AdamoAFontanesiS, et al. CFD analysis of combustion and knock in an optically accessible GDI engine. SAE Int J Engines2016; 09(1): 641–656.
28.
D’AdamoABredaSIaccarinoS, et al. Development of a RANS-based knock model to infer the knock probability in a research spark-ignition engine. SAE Int J Engines2017; 10(3): 722–739.
KalghatgiGBabikerHBadraJ.A simple method to predict knock using toluene, n-heptane and iso-octane blends (TPRF) as gasoline surrogates. SAE Int J Engines2015; 8: 505–519.
31.
Del PecchiaMFontanesiS. A methodology to formulate multicomponent fuel surrogates to model flame propagation and ignition delay. Fuel2020; 279: 118337.
32.
CancinoLRFikriMOliveiraAAM, et al. Ignition delay times of ethanol-containing multi-component gasoline surrogates: shock-tube experiments and detailed modeling. Fuel2011; 90: 1238–1244.
33.
FrassoldatiACuociAFaravelliT, et al. Kinetic modeling of the oxidation of ethanol and gasoline surrogate mixtures. Combust Sci Technol2010; 182: 653–667.
34.
NetzerCSeidelLRavetF, et al. Impact of the surrogate formulation on 3D CFD engine knock prediction using detailed chemistry. Fuel2019; 254: 115678.
35.
BradleyDHicksRALawesM, et al. The measurement of laminar burning velocities and Markstein numbers for iso-octane–air and iso-octane–n-heptane–air mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures in an explosion bomb. Combust Flame1998; 115(1–2): 126–144.
36.
D’AdamoADel PecchiaMBredaS, et al. Chemistry-Based laminar flame speed correlations for a wide range of engine conditions for iso-octane, n-heptane, toluene and gasoline surrogate fuels. SAE technical paper 2017-01-2190, 2017. DOI: 10.4271/2017-01-2190
37.
Del PecchiaMBredaSD'AdamoA, et al. Development of chemistry-based laminar flame speed correlation for part-load SI conditions and validation in a GDI research engine. SAE Int J Engines2018; 11(6): 715–741.
38.
SarathySMVranckxSYasunagaK, et al. A comprehensive chemical kinetic combustion model for the four butanol isomers. Combust Flame2012; 159: 2028–2055.
39.
YangYDecJEDronniouN, et al. Characteristics of isopentanol as a fuel for HCCI engines. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2010; 3: 725–741.
40.
SarathySMParkSWeberBW, et al. A comprehensive experimental and modeling study of iso-pentanol combustion. Combust Flame2013; 160: 2712–2728.
41.
ChristensenEYanowitzJRatcliffM, et al. Renewable oxygenate blending effects on gasoline properties. Energy Fuels2011; 25: 4723–4733.
42.
LiTXuMHungD, et al. Understanding the effects of fuel type and injection conditions on spray evaporation using optical diagnostics. SAE technical paper 2015-01-0926, 2015.
43.
VanDerWegeBAHochgrebS.Effects of fuel volatility and operating conditions on fuel sprays in DISI engines: (1) Imaging investigation. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0535, 2000.
44.
GiovannoniNBredaSPaltrinieriS, et al. CFD Analysis of the effects of fuel composition and injection strategy on mixture preparation and fuel deposit formation in a GDI engine. SAE technical paper 2015-24-2408, 2015. DOI: 10.4271/2015-24-2408
45.
YasunagaKSimmieJMCurranHJ, et al. Detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms of ethyl methyl, methyl tert-butyl and ethyl tert-butyl ethers: the importance of uni-molecular elimination reactions. Combust Flame2011; 158(6): 1032–1036.
FrassoldatiACuociTFaravelliU, et al. An experimental and kinetic modeling study of n-propanol and iso-propanol combustion. Combust Flame2010; 157(1): 2–16.
48.
FrassoldatiAGranaRFaravelliT, et al. Detailed kinetic modeling of the combustion of the four butanol isomers in premixed low-pressure flames. Combust Flame2012; 159: 2295–2311.
49.
GoldanigaAFaravelliTRanziE, et al. Oxidation of oxygenated octane improvers: MTBE, ETBE, DIPE, and TAME. Symp (Int) Combust1998; 27(1): 353–360.
50.
SarathySMFarooqAKalghatgiGT.Recent progress in gasoline surrogate fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci2018; 65: 67–108.
51.
ZhaoZConleyJPKazakovA, et al. Burning velocities of real gasoline fuel at 353 K and 500 K. SAE technical paper 2003-01-3265, 2003.
52.
TianGDanielRLiH, et al. Laminar burning velocities of 2,5-dimethylfuran compared with ethanol and gasoline. Energy Fuels2010; 24: 3898–3905.
53.
ChenJTMohamedAAESWangP, et al. A comprehensive experimental and kinetic modeling study of methyl tert-butyl ether combustion. Proc Combust Inst2024; 40(1–4): 105685.
54.
AhmedAWaqasMNaserN, et al. Compositional effects of gasoline fuels on combustion, performance and emissions in engine. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2016; 9(3): 460–468.
55.
MannaaOMansourMSRobertsWL, et al. Laminar burning velocities at elevated pressures for gasoline and gasoline surrogates associated with RON. Combust Flame2015; 162: 2311–2321.
56.
MannaaOAMansourMSRobertsWL, et al. Laminar burning velocities of fuels for advanced combustion engines (FACE) gasoline and gasoline surrogates with and without ethanol blending associated with octane rating. Combust Sci Technol2016; 188: 692–706.
57.
SileghemLAlekseevVAVancoillieJ, et al. Laminar burning velocity of gasoline and the gasoline surrogate components iso-octane, n-heptane and toluene. Fuel2013; 112: 355–365.
58.
HuEKuJYinG, et al. Laminar flame characteristics and kinetic modeling study of ethyl tertiary butyl ether compared with methyl tertiary butyl ether, ethanol, iso-octane, and gasoline. Energy Fuels2018; 32(3): 3935–3949.
59.
DirrenbergerPGlaudePABounaceurR, et al. Laminar burning velocity of gasolines with addition of ethanol. Fuel2014; 115: 162–169.
60.
MehlMChenJYPitzWJ, et al. An approach for formulating surrogates for gasoline with application toward a reduced surrogate mechanism for CFD engine modeling. Energy Fuels2011; 25: 5215–5223.
61.
RenSKokjohnSLWangZ, et al. A multi-component wide distillation fuel (covering gasoline, jet fuel and diesel fuel) mechanism for combustion and PAH prediction. Fuel2017; 208: 447–468.
62.
MehlMPitzWJWestbrookCK, et al. Kinetic modeling of gasoline surrogate components and mixtures under engine conditions. Proc Combust Inst2011; 33: 193–200.
63.
SilkeEJPitzWJWestbrookCK, et al. Detailed chemical kinetic modeling of cyclohexane oxidation. J Phys Chem A2007; 111: 3761–3775.
64.
PitzWJNaikCVMhaoldúinTN, et al. Modeling and experimental investigation of methylcyclohexane ignition in a rapid compression machine. Proc Combust Inst2007; 31: 267–275.
65.
MetcalfeWKBurkeSMAhmedSS, et al. A hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling study of C1− C2 hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels. Int J Chem Kinet2013; 45: 638–675.
MetcalfeWKPitzWJCurranHJ, et al. The development of a detailed chemical kinetic mechanism for diisobutylene and comparison to shock tube ignition times. Proc Combust Inst2007; 31: 377–384.
68.
SlavinskayaNARiedelUDworkinSB, et al. Detailed numerical modeling of PAH formation and growth in non-premixed ethylene and ethane flames. Combust Flame2012; 159: 979–995.
FayolleFFrançoisAGarnierL, et al. Limitations in MTBE Biodegradation. Oil Gas Sci Technol2003; 58(4): 497–504.
71.
BadraJABokhumseenNMullaN, et al. A methodology to relate octane numbers of binary and ternary n-heptane, iso-octane and toluene mixtures with simulated ignition delay times. Fuel2015; 160: 458–469.
72.
OwenKColeyTWeaverC.Automotive Fuels Reference Book. Society of Automotive Engineers, 1995.
73.
DemenezesECatalunaRSamiosD, et al. Addition of an azeotropic ETBE/ethanol mixture in Eurosuper-type gasolines. Fuel2006; 85: 2567–2577.
74.
RanziEFrassoldatiAGranaR, et al. Hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling of laminar flame speeds of hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci2012; 38(4): 468–501.
75.
BrezinskyK.The high-temperature oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons. Prog Energy Combust Sci1986; 12: 1–24.
76.
FiewegerKBlumenthalRAdomeitG. Shock-tube investigations on the self-ignition of hydrocarbon-air mixtures at high pressures. In: Twenty-Fifth Symposium (International) on Combustion/The Combustion Institute, 1994, pp. 1579–1585
77.
RibaucourMMinettiRSochetLR. Autoignition of n-pentane and 1-pentene: Experimental data and kinetic modeling. Lalaomtoire de Cinétique et Chimie de la Combustion—URA CNRS 876, Centre d'Études et de Recherches Lasers et Applications, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 2021.
78.
VranckxSLeeCChakravartyHK, et al. A rapid compression machine study of the low temperature combustion of cyclohexane at elevated pressures. Physico-chemical Fundamentals of Combustion, RWTH Aachen University, 2013.
79.
DunphyMPSimmieJM.Preliminary observations on the high temperature oxidation of ethyl tert-butyl ether. Int J Chem Kinet1991; 23: 553–558.
80.
YahyaouiMDjebaili-ChaumeixNDagautP, et al. Ethyl tertiary butyl ether ignition and combustion using a shock tube and spherical bomb. Energy Fuels2008; 22: 3701–3708.
