The application of active pre-chamber (PC) combustion systems offers potential increases of the indicated efficiency of spark-ignition (SI) engines by increasing the lean operating limit. In conventional SI operation, methanol revealed promising engine performance without substantial knock limitation. In PC operation with methanol under lean conditions, the PC jets can fail to ignite the charge in the main combustion chamber (MC) due to methanol’s high enthalpy of vaporization. The PC jet characteristics in turn depend on the applied PC fuel. In this study, it was assumed that the application of alternative liquid PC fuels might extend the lean operating limit of an engine that was operated with methanol as MC fuel. To this end, methanol, ethanol, 2-butanone, ethyl acetate, 1,3-dioxolane, and diethoxymethane were investigated as PC fuels in this study, while the MC was fueled with methanol. The fuels were experimentally investigated on a thermodynamic SI single-cylinder engine equipped with an active PC and a compression ratio of 16.4. Variations of the relative air/fuel ratio in the exhaust gas at net indicated mean effective pressures of 6 bar and 15 bar were performed. The observed differences in the engine performance between the investigated PC fuels were minor because a large fraction of the PC mixture consisted of the MC fuel methanol that was forced into the PC during the compression stroke. However, measured PC-driven HC emissions depended on the applied PC fuel and increased toward the engine’s lean operating limit at low engine load. At high engine load, this behavior was not observed. In PC operation, a maximum net indicated efficiency of 47.3% was observed, which was 0.8%-points higher than in conventional SI operation.
AttardWPFraserNParsonsP, et al. A turbulent jet ignition pre-chamber combustion system for large fuel economy improvements in a modern vehicle powertrain. SAE Int J Engines2010; 3: 20–37.
2.
AttardWPParsonsP.Flame kernel development for a spark initiated pre-chamber combustion system capable of high load, high efficiency and near zero NOx emissions. SAE Int J Engines2010; 3: 408–427.
3.
AttardWPBlaxillH.A gasoline fueled pre-chamber jet ignition combustion system at unthrottled conditions. SAE Int J Engines2012; 5(2): 315–329.
4.
AttardWPBlaxillH. A lean burn gasoline fueled pre-chamber jet ignition combustion system achieving high efficiency and low nox at part load. In: SAE 2012 world congress & exhibition. SAE technical papers, 2012. DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-1146.
5.
AttardWPToulsonEHuisjenA, et al. Spark ignition and pre-chamber turbulent jet ignition combustion visualization. SAE technical papers, 2012. DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0823.
6.
WoutersCBurkardtPPischingerS.Limits of compression ratio in spark-ignition combustion with methanol. Int J Engine Res2022; 23(5): 793–803.
7.
WeiFWangYTianH, et al. Visualization study on lean combustion characteristics of the premixed methanol by the jet ignition of an ignition chamber. Fuel2022; 308(5): 122001.
8.
ToulsonE.Applying alternative fuels in place of hydrogen to the jet ignition process. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne, 2008.
9.
LiuXSharmaPSilvaM, et al. Computational investigation of methanol pre-chamber combustion in a heavy-duty engine. Appl Energy Combust Sci2023; 15: 100192.
10.
BurkardtPWoutersCPischingerS.Evaluation of pre-chamber orifice orientation in an ethanol-fueled spark-ignition engine for passenger car applications. SAE Int J Engines2021; 15(4): 471–482.
11.
BurkardtPFleischmannMWegmannT, et al. On the use of active pre-chambers and bio-hybrid fuels in internal combustion engines. In: KalghatgiGAgarwalAKLeachF, et al. (eds) Engines and fuels for future transport, energy, environment, and sustainability. Springer, 2022, pp.205–231, Vol. 128.
12.
BurkardtPWoutersCPischingerS.Potential of alcohol fuels in active and passive pre-chamber applications in a passenger car spark-ignition engine. Int J Engine Res2023; 24(2): 494–505.
13.
BurkardtPLehrheuerBPischingerS.Controlled autoignition inside an active pre-chamber using alternative fuels. Appl Therm Eng2025; 263: 125300.
14.
OlsenDBKirkpatrickAT.Experimental examination of prechamber heat release in a large bore natural gas engine. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2008; 130: 052802-052809. DOI: 10.1115/1.2906182
15.
OlsenDBLisowskiJM.Prechamber NOx formation in low BMEP 2-stroke cycle natural gas engines. Appl Therm Eng2009; 29(4): 687–694.
16.
ShahATunestalPJohanssonB.Effect of relative mixture strength on performance of divided chamber ‘avalanche activated combustion’ ignition technique in a heavy duty natural gas engine. SAE technical papers, 2014. DOI:10.4271/2014-01-1327.
17.
BaumgartnerLSWohlgemuthSZirngiblS, et al. Investigation of a methane scavenged prechamber for increased efficiency of a lean-burn natural gas engine for automotive applications. SAE Int J Engines2015; 8(2): 921–933.
18.
ShahATunestalPJohanssonB.Effect of pre-chamber volume and nozzle diameter on pre-chamber ignition in heavy duty natural gas engines. SAE technical papers, 2015. DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-0867.
19.
ShahATunestalPJohanssonB. Scalability aspects of pre-chamber ignition in heavy duty natural gas engines. SAE technical papers, 2016. DOI:10.4271/2016-01-0796.
20.
HlaingPEcheverri MarquezMBhavani ShankarVS, et al. A study of lean burn pre-chamber concept in a heavy duty engine. SAE technical papers, 2019. DOI: 10.4271/2019-24-0107.
21.
SyrovatkaZVitekOVavraJ, et al. Scavenged pre-chamber volume effect on gas engine performance and emissions. SAE technical papers, 2019. DOI: 10.4271/2019-01-0258.
22.
AlmatrafiFHlaingPEcheverri MarquezM, et al. Narrow-throat pre-chamber combustion with ethanol a comparison with methane. SAE technical papers, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-2041.
23.
HlaingPEcheverri MarquezMSinghE, et al. Effect of pre-chamber enrichment on lean burn pre-chamber spark ignition combustion concept with a narrow-throat geometry. SAE technical papers, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0825.
24.
HlaingPEcheverri MarquezMBurgosP, et al. Analysis of fuel properties on combustion characteristics in a narrow-throat pre-chamber engine. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pract Mobil2021; 3: 3020–3043.
25.
HlaingPSilvaMMarquezME, et al. Estimates of the air-fuel ratio at the time of ignition in a pre-chamber using a narrow throat geometry. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 622–638.
26.
HlaingPEcheverri MarquezMCenkerE, et al. Effects of volume and nozzle area in narrow-throat spark-ignited pre-chamber combustion engines. Fuel2022; 313(4): 123029.
27.
HlaingPSaidACenkerE, et al. Comparing unburned fuel emission from a pre-chamber engine operating on alcohol fuels using FID and FTIR analyzers. SAE technical papers, 2022. DOI: 10.4271/2022-01-1094.
28.
BunceMBlaxillH.Methodology for combustion analysis of a spark ignition engine incorporating a pre-chamber combustor. SAE technical papers, 2014. DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-2603.
29.
BunceMBlaxillHKulatilakaW, et al. The effects of turbulent jet characteristics on engine performance using a pre-chamber combustor. SAE technical papers, 2014. DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-1195.
30.
PetersNBunceMBlaxillH.The impact of engine displacement on efficiency loss pathways in a highly dilute jet ignition engine. SAE technical papers, 2019. DOI: 10.4271/2019-01-0330.
31.
StadlerAWessolyMBlochumS, et al. Gasoline fueled pre-chamber ignition system for a light-duty passenger car engine with extended lean limit. SAE Int J Engines2019; 12(3): 323–339.
32.
PetersNKrishna Pothuraju SubramanyamSBunceM, et al. Optimization of lambda across the engine map for the purpose of maximizing thermal efficiency of a jet ignition engine. SAE technical papers, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0278.
33.
RusswurmTSchumacherMWensingM.Active fuelling of a passenger car sized pre-chamber ignition system with gaseous components of gasoline. SAE technical papers, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-2045.
34.
StadlerASauerlandHHärtlM, et al. The potential of gasoline fueled pre chamber ignition combined with elevated compression ratio. SAE technical papers, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0279.
35.
BunceMCairnsABlaxillH.The use of active jet ignition to overcome traditional challenges of pre-chamber combustors under low load conditions. Int J Engine Res2021; 22(11): 3325–3339.
36.
BunceMPetersNPothuraju SubramanyamSK, et al. The impact of advanced fuels and lubricants on thermal efficiency in a highly dilute engine. SAE Int J Adv Current Pract Mobi2021; 3: 2540–2553.
37.
HuaJZhouLGaoQ, et al. Influence of pre-chamber structure and injection parameters on engine performance and combustion characteristics in a turbulent jet ignition (TJI) engine. Fuel2021; 283(2): 119236.
38.
AtisCAAAyeleYStueckenT, et al. Effect of pre-chamber scavenging strategy on EGR tolerance and thermal efficiency of pre-chamber turbulent jet ignition systems. Int J Engine Res2023; 24(5): 1938–1960.
39.
AyeleYStueckenTSchockH.A study of the influence of orifice diameter on a dual mode, turbulent jet ignition engine through variable engine speed. Int J Engine Res2023; 24(4): 1704–1713.
40.
RohwerJHanTShahA, et al. Investigations into EGR dilution tolerance in a pre-chamber ignited GDI engine. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 1200–1222.
41.
YawsCL.Chemical properties handbook: physical, thermodynamic, environmental, transport, safety, and health related properties for the organic and inorganic chemicals. McGraw-Hill, 1999.
42.
CalvoEPintosMAmigoA, et al. Surface tension and density of mixtures of 1,3-dioxolane+alkanols at 298.15 K: analysis under the extended Langmuir model. J Colloid Interface Sci2004; 272(2): 438–443.
43.
YawsCL.The Yaws handbook of physical properties for hydrocarbons and chemicals. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2015.
DahmenMMarquardtW.A novel group contribution method for the prediction of the derived cetane number of oxygenated hydrocarbons. Energy Fuels2015; 29(9): 5781–5801.
48.
DaubertTEDannerRP.Physical and thermodynamic properties of pure chemicals: data compilation. Hemisphere Publishing, 1989.
49.
BurkardtPGüntherMPischingerS. Experimental and numerical assessment of engine performance using cyclopentanone and anisole as neat fuels and as blends with gasoline. SAE technical papers 2023-32-0050, 2023.
50.
BurkardtPOttenwälderTKönigA, et al. Toward co-optimization of renewable fuel blend production and combustion in ultra-high efficiency SI engines. Int J Engine Res2023; 24(1): 29–41.
51.
BurkardtPWoutersCPischingerS.Beating neat fuels by dedicated blending: performance analysis of bio-hybrid fuel blends on a spark-ignition engine for passenger car applications. Fuel2023; 331(1): 125579.
52.
BurkardtPGüntherMVillforthJ, et al. Jet-induced compression ignition (JICI)—application of spark-assisted compression ignition (SACI) in a combustion system with active pre-chamber. SAE Int J Engines2025; 18(1): 157–171.
53.
SpindtRS.Air-fuel ratios from exhaust gas analysis. SAE technical papers, 1965: 788–793. DOI: 10.4271/650507.
54.
BresenhamDReiselJNeusenK.Spindt air-fuel ratio method generalization for oxygenated fuels. SAE technical papers, 1998. DOI: 10.4271/982054.
55.
TangQSampathRMarquezME, et al. Optical diagnostics on the pre-chamber jet and main chamber ignition in the active pre-chamber combustion (PCC). Combust Flame2021; 228: 218–235.
56.
TangQSampathRSharmaP, et al. Study on the effects of narrow-throat pre-chamber geometry on the pre-chamber jet velocity using dual formaldehyde PLIF imaging. Combust Flame2022; 240: 111987.
57.
SampathRTangQEcheverri MarquezM, et al. Study on the Pre-Chamber fueling ratio effect on the main chamber combustion using simultaneous PLIF and OH* chemiluminescence Imaging. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pract Mobil2021; 3(1): 137–149.
58.
GingrichJWOlsenDBPuzinauskasP, et al. Precombustion chamber NOx emission contribution to an industrial natural gas engine. Int J Engine Res2006; 7(1): 41–49.
59.
TomićRSjerićMKrajnovićJ, et al. Influence of pre-chamber volume, orifice diameter and orifice number on performance of pre-chamber SI Engine—An experimental and numerical study. Energies2023; 16(6): 2884.
