Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines (H2ICE) have great potential as future carbon-free transportation, especially in heavy-duty applications, but the implementation in real vehicles has not yet been demonstrated due to a number of technical challenges. One of the most important issues is the design of hydrogen injector systems that can provide the needed amount of fuel into the combustion chamber with rapid mixing with the main chamber gases to achieve a near homogeneous mixture, in order to ensure stable combustion without anomalies such as pre-ignition and knocking. The present study provides an overview of the ongoing FUELCOM4 project with KAUST and Saudi Aramco in an effort to enhance our knowledge of hydrogen injection, mixing, and combustion characteristics by utilizing high-fidelity laser diagnostics and simulations. First, hydrogen jet injection and mixing characteristics are investigated in a high-pressure constant volume chamber experiment with accompanying simulations for validation. Jet penetration and dispersion characteristics depending on different injector configurations are examined. Recent developments in advanced laser diagnostic techniques to quantify the hydrogen fuel distribution are also discussed. Finally, parametric studies of the effects of jet dispersion and mixing on engine combustion characteristics are presented.
OnoratiAPayriRVagliecoBM, et al. The role of hydrogen for future internal combustion engines. Int J Engine Res2022; 23: 529–540.
2.
FrasciESementaPArsieIJannelliEVagliecoBM.Experimental and numerical investigation of the impact of the pure hydrogen fueling on fuel consumption and NOx emissions in a small DI SI engine. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 3574–3587.
3.
LeeSHwangJBaeC.Understanding hydrogen jet dynamics for direct injection hydrogen engines. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 4433–4444.
4.
OikawaMMogiYHoriguchiM, et al. Effect of modified combustion chamber configuration and enhanced squish flow on improving thermal efficiency in jet-plume-controlled direct-injection near-zero emission hydrogen engines. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 2897–2907.
5.
KimYHaJParkC, et al. Effects of exhaust gas recirculation on nitrogen oxides, brake torque and efficiency in a hydrogen direct injection spark ignition engine. Int J Engine Res2024; 25: 1124–1135.
6.
LiuXAljabriHPanthiN, et al. Computational study of hydrogen engine combustion strategies: dual-fuel compression ignition with port- and direct-injection, pre-chamber combustion, and spark-ignition. Fuel2023; 350: 128801.
7.
SunBBaoLLuoQ.Development and trends of direct injection hydrogen internal combustion engine technology. J Automot Saf Energy2021; 12: 265.
8.
KochDEbertTSousaA.Engine adaptation from diesel to H2 HP-EGR lean combustion concept. MTZ Worldw2020; 81: 30–37.
9.
TeohYHHowHGLeTD, et al. A review on production and implementation of hydrogen as a green fuel in internal combustion engines. Fuel2023; 333: 126525.
10.
LeTTSharmaPBoraBJ, et al. Fueling the future: a comprehensive review of hydrogen energy systems and their challenges. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 54: 791–816.
11.
SunZHongJZhangT, et al. Hydrogen engine operation strategies: recent progress, industrialization challenges, and perspectives. Int J Hydrogen Energy2023; 48: 366–392.
12.
ShindeBJKrishnasamyK.Recent progress in hydrogen fuelled internal combustion engine (H2ICE) – a comprehensive outlook. Mater Today Proc2022; 51: 1568–1579.
13.
ManzoorMUYosriMTaleiM, et al. Normal and knocking combustion of hydrogen: a numerical study. Fuel2023; 344: 128093.
14.
KondoTIioSHirumaM.A study on the mechanism of backfire in external mixture formation hydrogen engines-about backfire occurred by cause of the spark plug. SAE technical paper 9717041997.
15.
WelchAMumfordDMunshiS, et al. Challenges in developing hydrogen direct injection technology for internal combustion engines. SAE technical paper, 2008-01-2379, 2008.
16.
WallnerTLohse-BuschHShidoreN.Operating strategy for a hydrogen engine for improved drive-cycle efficiency and emissions behavior. Int J Hydrogen Energy2009; 34: 4617–4625.
17.
WallnerTScarcelliRNandeAMNaberJ.Assessment of multiple injection strategies in a direct-injection hydrogen research engine. SAE Int J Engines2009; 2: 1701–1709.
18.
ScarcelliRWallnerTMatthiasNSalazarVKaiserS.Mixture formation in direct injection hydrogen engines CFD and optical analysis of single- and multi-hole nozzles. SAE Int J Engines2011; 4: 2361–2375.
19.
BaoLZSunBGLuoQH, et al. Development of a turbocharged direct-injection hydrogen engine to achieve clean, efficient, and high-power performance. Fuel2022; 324: 124713.
20.
ScarcelliRWallnerTMatthiasNSalazarVKaiserS.Numerical and optical evolution of gaseous jets in direct injection hydrogen engines. SAE technical paper, 2011-01-0675, 2011.
21.
AddepalliSKPeiYZhangYScarcelliR.Multi-dimensional modeling of mixture preparation in a direct injection engine fueled with gaseous hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47: 29085–29101.
22.
LiuXMenacaRMohanB, et al. Assessment of piston and injector cap designs on the performance of a hydrogen direct-injection spark-ignition engine. Appl Therm Eng2025; 271: 126372.
23.
YipHLSrnaAYuenACY, et al. A review of hydrogen direct injection for internal combustion engines: towards carbon-free combustion. Appl Sci2019; 9: 4842.
24.
YipHLSrnaALiuX, et al. Visualization of hydrogen jet evolution and combustion under simulated direct-injection compression-ignition engine conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45: 32562–32578.
25.
HouidiMBMoreno-CabezasKZaihiA, et al. Investigating hydrogen direct injection technology: a comparative analysis of nozzle geometries for enhanced mixing in internal combustion engines. Proc Combust Inst2024; 40: 105631.
26.
AnYRamanVTangQ, et al. Combustion stability study of partially premixed combustion with low-octane fuel at low engine load conditions. Appl Energy2019; 235: 56–67.
27.
RamanVTangQAnY, et al. Impact of spray-wall interaction on the in-cylinder spatial unburned hydrocarbon distribution of a gasoline partially premixed combustion engine. Combust Flame2020; 215: 157–168.
28.
TangQLiuXRamanV, et al. Effects of fuel trapping in piston crevice on unburned hydrocarbon emissions in early-injection compression ignition engines. Combust Flame2021; 231: 111496.
29.
BadraJViolletYElwardanyAImHGChangJ.Physical and chemical effects of low octane gasoline fuels on compression ignition combustion. Appl Energy2016; 183: 1197–1208.
30.
BabayevRBen HouidiMAnderssonAJohanssonB.Isobaric combustion: a potential path to high efficiency, in combination with the double compression expansion engine (DCEE) concept. SAE technical paper 2019-01-0085, 2019.
31.
Rafig BabayevMBHBhavani ShankarVSAljohaniBSEJohanssonB. Injection strategies for isobaric combustion. SAE technical paper 2019-01-2267, 2019.
32.
GoyalHDyuisenakhmetovAHouidiMB, et al. The effect of engine speed, exhaust gas recirculation, and compression ratio on isobaric combustion. SAE Int J Engines2020; 13: 603–616.
33.
LiuXAljabriHAlRamadanAS, et al. Computational study of the multi-injector isobaric combustion concept in a heavy-duty compression ignition engine. Fuel2022; 326: 125099.
34.
AljabriHLiuXAl-lehaibiM, et al. Fuel flexibility potential for isobaric combustion in a compression ignition engine: a computational study. Fuel2022; 316: 123281.
35.
GoyalHPanthiNAlRamadanASCenkerEMagnottiG.Analysis of energy flows and emission characteristics of conventional diesel and isobaric combustion in an optical engine with laser diagnostics. Energy2023; 269: 126859.
36.
AljabriHHBabayevRLiuX, et al. Validation of computational models for isobaric combustion engines. SAE technical paper 2020-01-0806, 2020.
37.
HlaingPEcheverri MarquezMBhavani ShankarVS, et al. A study of lean burn pre-chamber concept in a heavy duty engine. SAE technical paper 2019-24-0107, 2019.
38.
Echeverri MarquezMHlaingPTangQ, et al. High-speed imaging of main chamber combustion of a narrow throat pre-chamber under lean conditions. SAE technical paper 2020-01-2081, 2020.
39.
SampathRTangQEcheverri MarquezM, et al. Study on the Pre-Chamber fueling ratio effect on the main chamber combustion using simultaneous PLIF and OH* chemiluminescence imaging. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pract Mobil2020; 3: 137–149.
40.
HlaingPSilvaMMarquezME, et al. Estimates of the air-fuel ratio at the time of ignition in a pre-chamber using a narrow throat geometry. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 622–638.
41.
SilvaMLiuXHlaingP, et al. Computational assessment of effects of throat diameter on combustion and turbulence characteristics in a pre-chamber engine. Appl Therm Eng2022; 212: 118595.
42.
LiuXSilvaMMohanB, et al. Computational optimization of the performance of a heavy-duty natural gas pre-chamber engine. Fuel2023; 352: 129075.
43.
SilvaMMohanBBadraJ, et al. DoE-ML guided optimization of an active pre-chamber geometry using CFD. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 2936–2948.
44.
TangQSampathRSharmaP, et al. Study on the effects of narrow-throat pre-chamber geometry on the pre-chamber jet velocity using dual formaldehyde PLIF imaging. Combust Flame2022; 240: 111987.
45.
LiuXSharmaPSilvaM, et al. Computational investigation of methanol pre-chamber combustion in a heavy-duty engine. Appl Energy Combust Sci2023; 15: 100192.
46.
SettlesGS.Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques: visualizing phenomena in transparent media. Springer Science Business Media, 2001.
47.
WuBWuHHouidiMB, et al. High-speed 1-D and 2-D Raman scattering measurement for quantitative characterization of transient hydrogen jets. Proc Combust Inst2024; 40: 105417.
48.
KrishnaYMahuthannanAMLacosteDAMagnottiG.50-kHz-rate Rayleigh and filtered Rayleigh scattering thermometry using a pulse-burst laser. In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, 2021.
49.
YeganehMChengQDharamsiA, et al. Visualization and comparison of methane and hydrogen jet dynamics using schlieren imaging. Fuel2023; 331: 125762.
50.
WangXSunBGLuoQH, et al. Visualization research on hydrogen jet characteristics of an outward-opening injector for direct injection hydrogen engines. Fuel2020; 280: 118710.
51.
KuenschZASchlatterSKeskinenK, et al. Experimental investigation on the gas jet behavior for a hollow cone piezoelectric injector. SAE technical paper 2014-01-2749, 2014.
52.
DongQLiYSongE, et al. The characteristic analysis of high-pressure gas jets for natural gas engine based on shock wave structure. Energy Convers Manag2017; 149: 26–38.
53.
YuJVuorinenVHillamoH, et al. An experimental study on high pressure pulsed jets for DI gas engine using planar laser-induced fluorescence. SAE technical paper 2012-01-1655, 2012.
54.
WuBSharmaPYuT, et al. High-speed 2-D Raman and Rayleigh imaging of a hydrogen jet issued from a hollow-cone piezo injector. SAE technical paper 2023-24-0019, 2023.
55.
HanZReitzRD.Turbulence modeling of internal combustion engines using RNG κ-ε models. Combust Sci Technol1995; 106: 267–295.
56.
BurkeMPChaosMJuYDryerFLKlippensteinSJ.Comprehensive H2/O2 kinetic model for high-pressure combustion. Int J Chem Kinet2012; 44: 444–474.
57.
CabezasKMZaihiALiuX, et al. Numerical analysis and comparison of different hydrogen jet injection configuration in a constant volume chamber. SAE technical paper 2024-01-2693, 2024.
58.
ZaihiACabezasKLiuX, et al. Hydrogen spray simulation with a hollow-cone injector. In: ILASS Europe, 2023, pp.1–7.
59.
DyuisenakhmetovAPanithasanMSCenkerE, et al. Performance and emissions analysis of a hydrogen-powered heavy-duty high compression ratio SI engine across various loads and speed at ultra-lean condition. SAE technical paper 2025-01-8428, 2025.
60.
PaneerselvamPPanithasanMSVenkatesanGMalairajanM.Optimization of common rail direct injection diesel engine performance with Melia dubia methyl ester peppermint oil blend using response surface methodology approach and investigation of hydrogen and hydroxy influence. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 50: 796–819.
61.
PanthiNSharmaPAlRamadanASCenkerEMagnottiG.Hydrogen combustion using port-fuel injections in a heavy-duty optical diesel engine converted to spark ignition operation. SAE technical paper 2023-32-0043, 2023.
62.
SenecalPPomraningERichardsK, et al. Multi-dimensional modeling of direct-injection diesel spray liquid length and flame lift-off length using CFD and parallel detailed chemistry. SAE technical paper 2003-01-1043, 2003.
63.
EwaldJPetersN.A level set based flamelet model for the prediction of combustion in spark ignition engines. Interdiscip Asp Turbul2005: 1–6.
64.
AljabriHMenacaRPanthiN, et al. Assessment of combustion models in hydrogen engine simulations using optical measurements. Fuel2025; 392: 134871.
65.
DongSWagnonSWPratali MaffeiL, et al. A new detailed kinetic model for surrogate fuels: C3MechV3.3. Appl Energy Combust Sci2022; 9: 100043.
66.
RanziEFrassoldatiAGranaR, et al. Hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling of laminar flame speeds of hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci2012; 38: 468–501.
67.
MetcalfeWKBurkeSMAhmedSSCurranHJ.A hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling study of C1− C2 hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels. Int J Chem Kinet2013; 45: 638–675.
68.
PetersN.Turbulent combustion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
69.
BergerLAttiliAPitschH.Synergistic interactions of thermodiffusive instabilities and turbulence in lean hydrogen flames. Combust Flame2022; 244: 112254.
