Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Dual-fuel diesel engine features powered by ammonia under various pilot-fuel injection timing: Comprehensive analysis and response surface methodology-based optimization
Ammonia is cogitated as a future fuel due to the carbon-free emission during its combustion. However, for obtaining high efficiency and low emissions while using ammonia as fuel, optimizing the operational parameters of the engine is necessary. Therefore, the present study focuses on evaluating the performance, emission, and combustion characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with ammonia with diesel fuel under dual-fuel mode. The novelty of the present work lies in the fact that optimizing the operating parameters was conducted through the experimental results based on the variation of pilot-fuel injection timing (PFIT) and engine load, as well as the implementation of response surface methodology (RSM) for determining the optimized conditions. In the first stage, the experimental analysis was conducted on a 3.5-kW diesel engine with a PFIT variation (23°, 26°, 29°, and 32°bTDC) and engine load (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%) by inducting ammonia directly into the inlet manifold with the help of a solenoid valve through port injection. The findings indicated the ideal PFIT for an ammonia-powered diesel engine of 29°bTDC. In the second stage, engine performance and emission parameters were optimized using desirability optimization in RSM. Resultantly, an engine load of 74.5% and PFIT of 31°bTDC could produce optimal brake thermal efficiency of 17.3%, liquid fuel ratio of 62.99%, and peak cylinder pressure of 48.43 bar. Moreover, emission parameters like 11.74 ppm CO, 0.49 vol.% CO2, 12.46 ppm HC, and 127.82 ppm NOx were also achieved. Interestingly, the as-used model could offer high efficiency and accuracy (<5% error) compared to experimental results. It could be generally concluded that ammonia-powered diesel engines should be operated at high engine loads and advanced PFIT to obtain better performance and emission characteristics.
NguyenVGDagerBChhillarA, et al. Desirability-based optimization of dual-fuel diesel engine using acetylene as an alternative fuel. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 59: 104488.
2.
NguyenVNRudzkiKDzidaM, et al. Understanding fuel saving and clean fuel strategies towards green maritime. Pol Marit Res2023; 30: 146–164.
3.
ChangxiongLHuYYangZGuoH. Experimental study of fuel combustion and emission characteristics of marine diesel engines using advanced fuels. Pol Marit Res2023; 30: 48–58.
4.
TeixeiraACRMachadoPGBorgesRRMouetteD. Public policies to implement alternative fuels in the road transport sector. Transp Policy2020; 99: 345–361.
5.
SerbinSDiasamidzeBDzidaMChenD. Investigation of the efficiency of a dual-fuel gas turbine combustion chamber with a plasma–chemical element. Pol Marit Res2023; 30: 68–75.
6.
CardosoJSSilvaVRochaRC, et al. Ammonia as an energy vector: current and future prospects for low-carbon fuel applications in internal combustion engines. J Clean Prod2021; 296: 126562.
7.
ShiJZhuYFengYYangJXiaC. A prompt decarbonization pathway for shipping: green hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol production and utilization in marine engines. Atmosphere2023; 14: 584.
8.
RehbeinMCMeierCEiltsPSchollS. Mixtures of ammonia and organic solvents as alternative fuel for internal combustion engines. Energy Fuels2019; 33: 10331–10342.
9.
Valera-MedinaAAmer-HatemFAzadAK, et al. Review on ammonia as a potential fuel: from synthesis to economics. Energy Fuels2021; 35: 6964–7029.
10.
FariaJA. Renaissance of ammonia synthesis for sustainable production of energy and fertilizers. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem2021; 29: 100466.
11.
ChiongM-CChongCTNgJ-H, et al. Advancements of combustion technologies in the ammonia-fuelled engines. Energy Convers Manag2021; 244: 114460.
12.
YuanHZhangJHuangXMeiN. Experimental investigation on binary ammonia–water and ternary ammonia–water–lithium bromide mixture-based absorption refrigeration systems for fishing ships. Energy Convers Manag2018; 166: 13–22.
13.
LinYLuJLiBLiYYangQ. Application of fuel cold energy in CO bog reliquefaction system on ammonia-powered CO carrier. Pol Marit Res2023; 30: 22–34.
14.
SiddiquiOIshaqHDincerI. Experimental investigation of improvement capability of ammonia fuel cell performance with addition of hydrogen. Energy Convers Manag2020; 205: 112372.
15.
Valera-MedinaAXiaoHOwen-JonesMDavidWIFBowenPJ. Ammonia for power. Prog Energy Combust Sci2018; 69: 63–102.
16.
ZincirB. Environmental and economic evaluation of ammonia as a fuel for short-sea shipping: a case study. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47: 18148–18168.
17.
DimitriouPJavaidR. A review of ammonia as a compression ignition engine fuel. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45: 7098–7118.
18.
NewhallHKStarkmanES. Theoretical performance of ammonia as a gas turbine fuel. SAE Transactions1967; 75: 772–784.
19.
VerkampFJHardinMCWilliamsJR. Ammonia combustion properties and performance in gas-turbine burners. Symp (Int) Combust1967; 11: 985–992.
20.
KobayashiHHayakawaASomarathneKDOkaforE. Science and technology of ammonia combustion. Proc Combust Inst2019; 37: 109–133.
21.
WabelTMSkibaAWTemmeJEDriscollJF. Measurements to determine the regimes of premixed flames in extreme turbulence. Proc Combust Inst2017;36:1809–1816.
22.
PyrcMGrucaMTutakWJamrozikA. Assessment of the co-combustion process of ammonia with hydrogen in a research VCR piston engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2023; 48: 2821–2834.
23.
MacFarlaneDRCherepanovPVChoiJ, et al. A roadmap to the ammonia economy. Joule2020; 4: 1186–1205.
24.
ShiCZhangZWangH, et al. Parametric analysis and optimization of the combustion process and pollutant performance for ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engines. Energy2024; 296: 131171.
25.
MaCYaoCSongE-ZDingS-L. Prediction and optimization of dual-fuel marine engine emissions and performance using combined ANN with PSO algorithms. Int J Engine Res2022; 23: 560–576.
26.
WüthrichSCartierPSüessP, et al. Optical investigation and thermodynamic analysis of premixed ammonia dual-fuel combustion initiated by dodecane pilot fuel. Fuel Commun2022; 12: 100074.
27.
FrostJTallASheriffAMSchönbornAHellierP. An experimental and modelling study of dual fuel aqueous ammonia and diesel combustion in a single cylinder compression ignition engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2021; 46: 35495–35510.
28.
ŞahinZZiya AkcancaİDurgunO. Experimental investigation of the effects of ammonia solution (NH3OH) on engine performance and exhaust emissions of a small diesel engine. Fuel2018; 214: 330–341.
29.
BorettiA. Novel dual fuel diesel-ammonia combustion system in advanced TDI engines. Int J Hydrogen Energy2017; 42: 7071–7076.
30.
FranklSGleisSKarmannSPragerMWachtmeisterG. Investigation of ammonia and hydrogen as CO2-free fuels for heavy duty engines using a high pressure dual fuel combustion process. Int J Engine Res2021; 22: 3196–3208.
31.
ReiterAJKongS-C. Combustion and emissions characteristics of compression-ignition engine using dual ammonia-diesel fuel. Fuel2011; 90: 87–97.
32.
LiTZhouXWangN, et al. A comparison between low- and high-pressure injection dual-fuel modes of diesel-pilot-ignition ammonia combustion engines. J Energy Inst2022; 102: 362–373.
33.
YousefiAGuoHDevSLikoBLafranceS. Effects of ammonia energy fraction and diesel injection timing on combustion and emissions of an ammonia/diesel dual-fuel engine. Fuel2022; 314: 122723.
34.
YousefiAGuoHDevSLafranceSLikoB. A study on split diesel injection on thermal efficiency and emissions of an ammonia/diesel dual-fuel engine. Fuel2022; 316: 123412.
35.
TayKLYangWLiJ, et al. Numerical investigation on the combustion and emissions of a kerosene-diesel fueled compression ignition engine assisted by ammonia fumigation. Appl Energy2017; 204: 1476–1488.
36.
FørbyNThomsenTBCordtzRFBræstrupFSchrammJ. Ignition and combustion study of premixed ammonia using GDI pilot injection in CI engine. Fuel2023; 331: 125768.
37.
ElumalaiRRaviK. Strategy to reduce carbon emissions by adopting ammonia–algal biodiesel in RCCI engine and optimize the fuel concoction using RSM methodology. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47: 39701–39718.
38.
ZaherMHYousefiADadsetanM, et al. Characterization of soot emissions formed in a compression ignition engine cofired by ammonia and diesel. Fuel2023; 349: 128715.
39.
ZhouXLiTWangN, et al. Pilot diesel-ignited ammonia dual fuel low-speed marine engines: a comparative analysis of ammonia premixed and high-pressure spray combustion modes with CFD simulation. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2023; 173: 113108.
40.
ShinJParkS. Numerical analysis for optimizing combustion strategy in an ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engine. Energy Convers Manag2023; 284: 116980.
41.
NadimiEPrzybyłaGLewandowskiMTAdamczykW. Effects of ammonia on combustion, emissions, and performance of the ammonia/diesel dual-fuel compression ignition engine. J Energy Inst2023; 107: 101158.
42.
LiuLWuJLiuHWuYWangY. Study on marine engine combustion and emissions characteristics under multi-parameter coupling of ammonia-diesel stratified injection mode. Int J Hydrogen Energy2023; 48: 9881–9894.
43.
MiSWuHPeiX, et al. Potential of ammonia energy fraction and diesel pilot-injection strategy on improving combustion and emission performance in an ammonia-diesel dual fuel engine. Fuel2023; 343: 127889.
44.
WangBYangCWangH, et al. Study on injection strategy of ammonia/hydrogen dual fuel engine under different compression ratios. Fuel2023; 334: 126666.
45.
WangZDongBYinJ, et al. Towards a marine green power system architecture: integrating hydrogen and ammonia as zero-carbon fuels for sustainable shipping. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 50: 1069–1087.
46.
WangYZhouXLiuL. Theoretical investigation of the combustion performance of ammonia/hydrogen mixtures on a marine diesel engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2021; 46: 14805–14812.
47.
MoffatRJ. Contributions to the theory of single-sample uncertainty analysis. J Fluid Eng1982; 104: 250–258.
48.
SarabiaLAOrtizMCSánchezMS. Response surface methodology. In: Comprehensive Chemometrics: Chemical and Biochemical Data Analysis. Elsevier, 2020, pp.287–326.
49.
NazarpourMTaghizadeh-AlisaraeiAAsghariAAbbaszadeh-MayvanATatariA. Optimization of biohydrogen production from microalgae by response surface methodology (RSM). Energy2022; 253: 124059.
50.
JainABoraBJKumarR, et al. Application of hybrid Taguchi L16 and desirability for model prediction and optimization in assessment of the performance of a novel water hyacinth biodiesel run diesel engine. Fuel2023; 339: 127377.
51.
AhmadAYadavAKSinghASinghDK. A comprehensive machine learning-coupled response surface methodology approach for predictive modeling and optimization of biogas potential in anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste. Biomass and Bioenergy2024; 180: 106995.
EmersonRW. ANOVA assumptions. J Vis Impair Blind2022; 116: 585–586.
54.
RouderJNEngelhardtCRMcCabeSMoreyRD. Model comparison in ANOVA. Psychon Bull Rev2016; 23: 1779–1786.
55.
IzzaNSumarniNPramesiNDMahardiUADewiSR. Extraction of phenolic compounds from Coleus amboinicus leaves by microwave-assisted extraction: optimization of the operating condition. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol2022; 12: 946–952.
56.
RosalindaSFitriyaniHMardawatiE. Optimization of Ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) conditions on vitamin C from Roselle Flower. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol2024; 14: 237–245.
57.
OnukwuliDOEsonyeCOfoefuleAUEyisiR. Comparative analysis of the application of artificial neural network-genetic algorithm and response surface methods-desirability function for predicting the optimal conditions for biodiesel synthesis from chrysophyllum albidum seed oil. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2021; 125: 153–167.
58.
MäkeläM. Experimental design and response surface methodology in energy applications: a tutorial review. Energy Convers Manag2017; 151: 630–640.
59.
ManojkumarNMuthukumaranCSharmilaG. A comprehensive review on the application of response surface methodology for optimization of biodiesel production using different oil sources. J King Saud Univ - Eng Sci2022; 34: 198–208.
60.
AshokBUsmanKMVigneshRUmarUA. Model-based injector control map development to improve CRDi engine performance and emissions for eucalyptus biofuel. Energy2022; 246: 123355.
61.
JonesBGoosP. I-optimal versus D-optimal split-plot response surface designs. J Qual Technol2012; 44: 85–101.
62.
LiuXHanXZhaoS, et al. Optimisation of micro W-bending process parameters using I-optimal design-based response surface methodology. Manuf Rev2021; 8: 7.
63.
Allen. DOE and Regression Theory: Introduction to Engineering Statistics and Lean Six Sigma. London: Springer, 2010, pp.453–484.
64.
Van BrantegemKStrouwenAGoosP. D- and I-optimal design of multi-factor industrial experiments with ordinal outcomes. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst2022; 221: 104463.
65.
OkumuşFKanberoğluBGoncaG, et al. The effects of ammonia addition on the emission and performance characteristics of a diesel engine with variable compression ratio and injection timing. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 64: 186–195.
66.
LakshminarayananPAAghavYV. Ignition Delay in a Diesel Engine. In: Modelling Diesel Combustion. Mechanical Engineering Series. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009; 59–78. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3885-2_5.
67.
LeVVHoangATNižetićSÖlçerAI. Flame characteristics and ignition delay times of 2, 5-dimethylfuran: a systematic review with comparative analysis. J Energy Resour Technol2021; 43: 1–16.
68.
NikiY. Reductions in unburned ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from an ammonia-assisted diesel engine with early timing diesel pilot injection. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2021; 143: 1–7. DOI: 10.1115/1.4051002.
69.
Al-DawodyMFAl-ObaidiWAboudED, et al. Mechanical engineering advantages of a dual fuel diesel engine powered by diesel and aqueous ammonia blends. Fuel2023; 346: 128398.
70.
XuLXuSBaiX-S, et al. Performance and emission characteristics of an ammonia/diesel dual-fuel marine engine. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2023; 185: 113631.
71.
NikiYNittaYSekiguchiHHirataK. Diesel fuel multiple injection effects on emission characteristics of diesel engine mixed ammonia gas into intake air. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2019; 141: 1–7. DOI: 10.1115/1.4042507.
