Oxymethylene dimethyl ethers (OMEx), having a chemical formula of CH3O-(CH2O)x-CH3 where x varies from 1 to 5, have been widely considered as a promising fuel to partially replace diesel in CI engines in terms of reducing soot emissions. This work is focused on developing a reduced primary reference fuel (PRF)-OMEx chemical mechanism to better describe the combustion and emission characteristics of gasoline/diesel blends with OMEx. The novelty of this work lies in the fact that the OMEx part of the mechanism is represented not only by OME3 as done in most studies found in literature, but also with other OME chain lengths that is, OME2-4 which are considered to be optimum and better represent the commercial OMEx blends. For this purpose, a detailed OMEx mechanism is reduced by applying different reduction techniques considering a wide range of operating conditions including pressure, temperatures, equivalence ratios and fuel compositions. The result is merged with an already validated PRF mechanism to form a reduced PRF-OMEx mechanism consisting of 213 species and 840 reactions. The newly formed mechanism is validated against a wide set of experimental data including ignition delay times, laminar flame speeds and species concentration profiles. Furthermore, a rigorous set of numerical simulations for various diesel-OMEx blends in a compression ignition engine are carried out at two different operating points to validate the developed mechanism. Simulation results highlight that the developed mechanism not only replicates the experimental behavior in terms of in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate but exhibits a better combustion phasing closer to experimental data when compared with other mechanisms where only OME3 is utilized to represent OMEx. Overall, the developed PRF-OMEx mechanism proves to be realistic and suitable for application in engine combustion simulations involving gasoline/diesel and OMEx blends.
RispoliALVerdoneNVilardiG. Green fuel production by coupling plastic waste oxy-combustion and PtG technologies: economic, energy, exergy and CO2-cycle analysis. Fuel Process Technol2021; 221: 106922.
3.
ChumHLOverendRP. Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel Process Technol2001; 71: 187–195.
4.
García-OliverJMNovellaRMicóCBin-KhalidU. A numerical investigation of the performance of oxymethylene ethers blended with fossil diesel to reduce soot emissions in compression ignition engines. Fuel2022; 324: 124768.
GarcíaAMonsalve-SerranoJVillaltaDGuzmán-MendozaM. Parametric assessment of the effect of oxygenated low carbon fuels in a light-duty compression ignition engine. Fuel Process Technol2022; 229: 107199.
YangQGrillMBargendeM. The application of e-fuel oxymethylene ether OME1 in a virtual heavy-duty diesel engine for ultra-low emissions. SAE technical paper, 14April2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0349.
9.
OmariAHeuserBPischingerS. Potential of oxymethylenether-diesel blends for ultra-low emission engines. Fuel2017; 209: 232–237.
10.
WeiJFanCQiuL, et al. Impact of methanol alternative fuel on oxidation reactivity of soot emissions from a modern CI engine. Fuel2020; 268: 117352.
11.
LumppBRotheDPastötterCLämmermannRJacobE. Oxymethylene ethers as diesel fuel additives of the future. MTZ Worldwide2011; 72: 34–38.
12.
LiuJWangLWangP, et al. An overview of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers as alternative fuel for compression ignition engines. Fuel2022; 318: 123582.
13.
IannuzziSEBarroCBoulouchosKBurgerJ. Combustion behavior and soot formation/oxidation of oxygenated fuels in a cylindrical constant volume chamber. Fuel2016; 167: 49–59.
14.
PastorJVGarcia-OliverJMMicóC, et al. Combustion behaviour of blends of synthetic fuels in an optical single cylinder engine. SAE technical papers. SAE International, 5September2021. DOI: 10.4271/2021-24-0038.
15.
BurgerJSiegertMStröferEHasseH. Poly(oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers as components of tailored diesel fuel: properties, synthesis and purification concepts. Fuel2010; 89: 3315–3319.
16.
BurgerJStröferEHasseH. Production process for diesel fuel components poly(oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chem Eng Res Des2013; 91: 2648–2662.
17.
Garcia-OliverJMNovellaRLopez PintorD, et al. A numerical approach for the analysis of hydrotreated vegetable oil and dimethoxy methane blends as low-carbon alternative fuel in compression ignition engines. SAE technical paper, 11April2023. DOI: 10.4271/2023-01-0338.
18.
ZhengYTangQWangTLiaoYWangJ. Synthesis of a green fuel additive over cation resins. Chem Eng Technol2013; 36: 1951–1956.
19.
HärtlMSeidenspinnerPJacobEWachtmeisterG. Oxygenate screening on a heavy-duty diesel engine and emission characteristics of highly oxygenated oxymethylene ether fuel OME1. Fuel2015; 153: 328–335.
20.
PellegriniLMarchionnaMPatriniR, et al. Combustion behaviour and emission performance of neat and blended polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers in a light-duty diesel engine. SAE technical paper, 16April2012. DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-1053.
21.
PastorJVGarcíaAMicóCLewiskiF. An optical investigation of Fischer-Tropsch diesel and oxymethylene dimethyl ether impact on combustion process for CI engines. Appl Energy2020; 260: 114238.
22.
SchemmeSSamsunRCPetersRStoltenD. Power-to-fuel as a key to sustainable transport systems – an analysis of diesel fuels produced from CO2 and renewable electricity. Fuel2017; 205: 198–221.
23.
RichterSKathrotiaTBraun-UnkhoffMNaumannCKöhlerM. Influence of oxymethylene ethers (omen) in mixtures with a diesel surrogate. Energies2021; 14: 7848.
24.
PöllmannSHärtlMJaenschMWachtmeisterG. Evaluation of strategies to optimize engine efficiency and NOx emissions with the synthetic diesel fuel oxymethylene ether. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 3214–3230.
25.
PélerinDGaukelKHärtlMJacobEWachtmeisterG. Potentials to simplify the engine system using the alternative diesel fuels oxymethylene ether OME1 and OME3−6 on a heavy-duty engine. Fuel2020; 259:116231.
26.
WangTLiuJSunP, et al. Influence of injection parameters on combustion, gaseous emissions and particle size distribution of a CRDI diesel engine operating with PODE/diesel blends. Fuel2020; 281: 118733.
27.
ChenHWangHChenZ, et al. Research progress on the spray, combustion and emission of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers as a diesel blend fuel: a review. Fuel2022; 324: 124731.
28.
LiuJWangHLiY, et al. Effects of diesel/PODE (polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers) blends on combustion and emission characteristics in a heavy duty diesel engine. Fuel2016; 177: 206–216.
29.
SunWWangGLiS, et al. Speciation and the laminar burning velocities of poly(oxymethylene) dimethyl ether 3 (POMDME3) flames: an experimental and modeling study. Proc Combust Inst2017; 36: 1269–1278.
30.
HeTWangZYouX, et al. A chemical kinetic mechanism for the low- and intermediate-temperature combustion of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether 3 (PODE3). Fuel2018; 212: 223–235.
31.
CaiLJacobsSLangerR, et al. Auto-ignition of oxymethylene ethers (OMEn, n = 2–4) as promising synthetic e-fuels from renewable electricity: shock tube experiments and automatic mechanism generation. Fuel2020; 264: 116711.
32.
LiuHWangZWangJHeX. Improvement of emission characteristics and thermal efficiency in diesel engines by fueling gasoline/diesel/poden blends. Energy2016; 97: 105–112.
33.
HeTLiuHYWangY, et al. Development of surrogate model for oxygenated wide-distillation fuel with polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2017; 10: 803–814.
34.
RenSWangZLiBLiuHWangJ. Development of a reduced polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODEn) mechanism for engine applications. Fuel2019; 238: 208–224.
35.
LinQTayKLZhouDYangW. Development of a compact and robust polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether 3 reaction mechanism for internal combustion engines. Energy Convers Manag2019; 185: 35–43.
36.
LvDChenYChenY, et al. Development of a reduced diesel/PODEn mechanism for diesel engine application. Energy Convers Manag2019; 199: 112070.
37.
JingZZhangCCaiPLiYWangJ. Construction of a reduced diesel/polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether 3 (PODE3) reaction mechanism for combustion and emission analysis. Energy Fuels2021; 35: 4437–4446.
38.
LinQTayKLZhaoFYangW. Enabling robust simulation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether 3 (PODE3) combustion in engines. Int J Engine Res2022; 23: 1522–1542.
39.
TanakaSAyalaFKeckJC. A reduced chemical kinetic model for HCCI combustion of primary reference fuels in a rapid compression machine. Combust Flame2003; 133: 467–481.
40.
RaYReitzRD. A reduced chemical kinetic model for IC engine combustion simulations with primary reference fuels. Combust Flame2008; 155: 713–738.
41.
TsurushimaT. A new skeletal PRF kinetic model for HCCI combustion. Proc Combust Inst2009; 32: 2835–2841.
42.
LiuY-DJiaMXieM-ZPangB. Enhancement on a skeletal kinetic model for primary reference fuel oxidation by using a semidecoupling methodology. Energy Fuels2012; 26: 7069–7083.
43.
WangHYaoMReitzRD. Development of a reduced primary reference fuel mechanism for internal combustion engine combustion simulations. Energy Fuels2013; 27: 7843–7853.
44.
ChangYJiaMLiY, et al. Development of a skeletal mechanism for diesel surrogate fuel by using a decoupling methodology. Combust Flame2015; 162: 3785–3802.
45.
BenajesJGarcia-OliverJMPastorJMDe Leon-CerianiD. Unsteady Flamelet modeling study on OMEx-type fuels under engine combustion network spray A conditions. Fuel2023; 331: 125458.
46.
HaspelPGierthSPoppS, et al. Large eddy simulation of OME3 and OME4 spray combustion under heavy-duty conditions. Fuel2023; 353: 129097.
47.
García-OliverJMNovellaRMicóCDe Leon-CerianiD. Numerical analysis of the combustion process of oxymethylene ethers as low-carbon fuels for compression ignition engines. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 2175–2186.
48.
PepiotdesjardinsPPitschH. An efficient error-propagation-based reduction method for large chemical kinetic mechanisms. Combust Flame2008; 154: 67–81.
49.
SunWChenZGouXJuY. A path flux analysis method for the reduction of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms. Combust Flame2010; 157: 1298–1307.
50.
CHEMKIN 15151, Reaction Design: San Diego, 2015.
51.
KlotzSDBrezinskyKGlassmanI. Modeling the combustion of toluene-butane blends. Symp (Int) Combust1998; 27: 337–344.
52.
ShenHPSSteinbergJVanderoverJOehlschlaegerMA. A shock tube study of the ignition of n-heptane, n-decane, n-dodecane, and n-tetradecane at elevated pressures. Energy Fuels2009; 23: 2482–2489.
53.
FiewegerKBlumenthalRAdomeitG. Self-ignition of S.I. engine model fuels: a shock tube investigation at high pressure. Combusti Flame1997; 109: 599–619.
54.
HartmannMGushterovaIFikriM, et al. Auto-ignition of toluene-doped n-heptane and iso-octane/air mixtures: high-pressure shock-tube experiments and kinetics modeling. Combust Flame2011; 158: 172–178.
55.
HerzlerJJerigLRothP. Shock tube study of the ignition of lean n-heptane/air mixtures at intermediate temperatures and high pressures. Proc Combust Inst2005; 30: 1147–1153.
56.
EckartSCaiLFritscheC, et al. Laminar burning velocities, CO, and NOx emissions of premixed polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether flames. Fuel2021; 293: 120321.
57.
ShresthaKPEckartSDrostS, et al. A comprehensive kinetic modeling of oxymethylene ethers (OMEn, n=1–3) oxidation - laminar flame speed and ignition delay time measurements. Combust Flame2022; 246: 112426.
58.
WangQSunWGuoL, et al. Experimental and kinetic study on the laminar burning speed, Markstein length and cellular instability of oxygenated fuels. Fuel2021; 297: 120754.
59.
DavisSGLawCK. Laminar flame speeds and oxidation kinetics of iso-octane-air and n-heptane-air flames. Symp (Int) Combust1998; 27: 521–527.
60.
van LipzigJPJNilssonEJKde GoeyLPHKonnovAA. Laminar burning velocities of n-heptane, iso-octane, ethanol and their binary and tertiary mixtures. Fuel2011; 90: 2773–2781.
61.
DirrenbergerPGlaudePABounaceurR, et al. Laminar burning velocity of gasolines with addition of ethanol. Fuel2014; 115: 162–169.
62.
BakaliAEDelfauJ-LVovelleC. Experimental Study of 1 atmosphere, rich, premixedn-heptane and iso-octane flames. Combust Sci Technol1998; 140: 69–91.
63.
MarchalCDelfauJ-LVovelleC, et al. Modelling of aromatics and soot formation from large fuel molecules. Proc Combust Inst2009; 32: 753–759.
PayriFOlmedaPMartínJGarcíaA. A complete 0D thermodynamic predictive model for direct injection diesel engines. Appl Energy2011; 88: 4632–4641.
66.
García-OliverJMNovellaRMicóCBin-KhalidULopez-PintorD. A numerical analysis of hydrotreated vegetable oil and dimethoxymethane (OME1) blends combustion and pollutant formation through the development of a reduced reaction mechanism. Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 5 February 2024. DOI: 10.1177/14680874231226321
67.
PitzWJMuellerCJ. Recent progress in the development of diesel surrogate fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci2011; 37: 330–350.
68.
DiezACrookesRJLøvåsT. Experimental studies of autoignition and soot formation of diesel surrogate fuels. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2013; 227: 656–664.
69.
WuYAysIGeimerM. Analysis and preliminary design of oxymethylene ether (OME) driven mobile machines. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.5445/IR/1000097941
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
