Pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SO2), and particulate matter (PM) in ship exhaust have a great impact on human health, environment and climate conditions. Combined selective catalytic reduction technology and dry exhaust gas cleaning technology, a test rig (SCR-DryEGCS system) for WD10C195-15 marine four-stroke high speed diesel engine was established to analyse the removal effect of NOx, SO2, and PM from exhaust gas. The SCR-DryEGCS system removed 89.03%, 99%, and 96% of NOx, SO2, and PM respectively. And also compared with low sulfur oil combined SCR method to verify the feasibility of the SCR-DryEGCS method. It shows that the SCR-DryEGCS system has its own advantages and has a good effect on the removal of NOx, SOx, and PM at the same time.
VuHNKHaQPNguyenDH, et al. Poor air quality and its association with mortality in Ho Chi Minh city: case study. Atmos2020; 11(7): 750.
2.
LiuHMengZHLvZF, et al. Emissions and health impacts from global shipping embodied in US–China bilateral trade. Nat Sustain2019; 2(11): 1027–1033.
3.
ZhaoJWeiQWangSRenX. Progress of ship exhaust gas control technology. Sci Total Environ2021; 799: 149437.
4.
WuXFengYGaoY, et al. Numerical simulation of lean premixed combustion characteristics and emissions of natural gas-ammonia dual-fuel marine engine with the pre-chamber ignition system. Fuel2023; 343: 127990.
5.
WuXFengYXuG, et al. Numerical investigations on charge motion and combustion of natural gas-enhanced ammonia in marine pre-chamber lean-burn engine with dual-fuel combustion system. Int J Hydrog Energy2023; 48(30): 11476–11492.
6.
ShiJZhuYFengYYangJXiaC. A prompt decarbonization pathway for shipping: green hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol production and utilization in marine engines. Atmos2023; 14(3): 584.
7.
NiPWangXLiH. A review on regulations, current status, effects and reduction strategies of emissions for marine diesel engines. Fuel, 2020; 279: 118477.
8.
YangJSongLWeiY, et al. A novel one-step wet denitration method by hydrodynamic cavitation and chlorine dioxide. J Environ Chem Eng2022; 10: 107897.
9.
ZhangYXiaCLiuDZhuYFengY. Experimental investigation of the high-pressure SCR reactor impact on a marine two-stroke diesel engine. Fuel2023; 335: 127064.
10.
HarderKNiemeyerJRemeleJGraichenK. Hierarchical model predictive control for an off-highway diesel engine with SCR catalyst. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 3170–3185.
11.
WangZZhuYZhouSFengY. Reaction mechanism and chemical kinetics of NH3-NO/NO2-SCR system with vanadium-based catalyst under marine diesel exhaust conditions. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2020; 234(3): 342–352.
12.
ShiJZhuYPengH, et al. Modeling and simulation of marine SCR system based on Modelica. Int J Engine Res2023; 24(3): 1016–1026.
13.
XiaCZhuYLiuD, et al. Newly developed detailed urea decomposition mechanism by marine engine urea-SCR system crystallization test and DFT calculations. Chem Eng J2023; 470: 144176.
14.
GalindoJClimentHNavarroRMiguel-GarcíaJChaletDPretotPE. A study on the high pressure EGR transport and application to the dispersion among cylinders in automotive engines. Int J Engine Res2021; 22(10): 3164–3178.
15.
WangZZhouSFengYZhuY. Research of NOx reduction on a low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine by using EGR (exhaust gas recirculation)–CB (cylinder bypass) and EGB (exhaust gas bypass). Int J Hydrogen Energy2017; 42(30): 19337–19345.
16.
LuZLiuMShiLWangTLuTWangH. Numerical research of the injected exhaust gas recirculation strategy on a two-stroke low-speed marine diesel engine. Energy2022; 244: 122731.
17.
GalindoJDolzVMonsalve-SerranoJBernalMAOdillardL. Impacts of the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) combined with the regeneration mode in a compression ignition diesel engine operating at cold conditions. Int J Engine Res2021; 22(12): 3548–3557.
18.
QuJFengYXuGZhangMZhuYZhouS. Design and thermodynamics analysis of marine dual fuel low speed engine with methane reforming integrated high pressure exhaust gas recirculation system. Fuel2022; 319: 123747.
19.
ZhuYZhouWXiaCHouQ. Application and development of selective catalytic reduction technology for marine low-speed diesel engine: trade-off among high sulfur fuel, high thermal efficiency, and low pollution emission. Atmos2022; 13(5): 731.
20.
ZhuYXiaCShrekaM, et al. Combustion and emission characteristics for a marine low-speed diesel engine with high-pressure SCR system. Environ Sci Pollut Res2020; 27(12): 12851–12865.
21.
BayramoğluKÖzmenG. Design and performance evaluation of low-speed marine diesel engine selective catalytic reduction system. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 155: 184–196.
22.
XiaCZhuYZhouS, et al. Simulation study on transient performance of a marine engine matched with high-pressure SCR system. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 1327–1345.
23.
UmHSKimDKimKH. Numerical study on the design of urea decomposition chamber in LP SCR system. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng2019; 11(1): 307–313.
24.
ČamparaLHasanspahićNVujičićS. Overview of MARPOL ANNEX VI regulations for prevention of air pollution from marine diesel engines. SHS Web Conf2018; 58: 01004. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20185801004
25.
YangZTanQGengP. Combustion and emissions investigation on low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine with low sulfur diesel fuel. Pol Marit Res2019; 26(1): 153–161. 1.
26.
JangHJeongBZhouP, et al. Development of parametric trend life cycle assessment for marine SOx reduction scrubber systems. J Clean Prod2020; 272: 122821.
27.
VasilescuMVDinuDPanaitescuMPanaitescuFV. Research on exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS) used in shipping industry for reducing SOx emissions. E3S Web Conf2021; 286: 04002. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202128604002
28.
AbadieLMGoicoecheaNGalarragaI. Adapting the shipping sector to stricter emissions regulations: fuel switching or installing a scrubber?Transp Res D Transp Environ2017; 57: 237–250.
29.
ZhuMLiKXLinKCShiWYangJ. How can shipowners comply with the 2020 global sulphur limit economically?Transp Res D Transp Environ2020; 79: 102234.
30.
VedachalamSBaquerizoNDalaiAK. Review on impacts of low sulfur regulations on marine fuels and compliance options. Fuel2022; 310: 122243.
31.
ZhouJZhouSZhuY. Characterization of particle and gaseous emissions from marine diesel engines with different fuels and impact of after-treatment technology. Energies2017; 10(8): 1110.
32.
GuoMFuZMaDJiNSongCLiuQ. A short review of treatment methods of marine diesel engine exhaust gases. Procedia Eng2015; 121: 938–943.
33.
PanasiukITurkinaL. The evaluation of investments efficiency of SO scrubber installation. Transp Res D Transp Environ2015; 40: 87–96.
34.
LiWZhangYZhaoZ, et al. Simulation investigation on marine exhaust gas SO2 absorption by seawater scrubbing. J Air Waste Manag Assoc2022; 72(5): 383–402.
35.
ZhuYTangXLiT, et al. Shipboard trials of magnesium-based exhaust gas cleaning system. Ocean Eng2016; 128: 124–131.
36.
ZannisTCKatsanisJSChristopoulosGP, et al. Marine exhaust gas treatment systems for compliance with the IMO 2020 global sulfur cap and tier III NOx limits: a review. Energies2022; 15(10): 3638.
ZhouSZhouJZhuY. Chemical composition and size distribution of particulate matters from marine diesel engines with different fuel oils. Fuel2019; 235: 972–983.
40.
HallquistÅMFridellEWesterlundJHallquistM. Onboard measurements of nanoparticles from a SCR-equipped marine diesel engine. Environ Sci Technol2013; 47(2): 773–780.
41.
WangZZhangXGuoJHaoCFengY. Particle emissions from a marine diesel engine burning two kinds of sulphur diesel oils with an EGR & scrubber system: size, number & mass. Process Saf Environ Prot2022; 163: 94–104.
42.
ChenRZhangTGuoYWangJWeiJYuQ. Recent advances in simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx from exhaust gases: removal process, mechanism and kinetics. Chem Eng J2021; 420: 127588.
43.
CaroSOttsenHPowellJ. Air pollution control system for ocean-going vessels. U.S. Patent No. 8,327,631, 11December2012. https://www.freepatentsonline.com/8327631.html (accessed 10 June 2022).
44.
LimousyLMahzoulHBrilhacJFGarinFMaireGGilotP. A study of the regeneration of fresh and aged SO adsorbers under reducing conditions. Appl Catal B2003; 45(3): 169–179.
45.
OsakaYIwaiKTsujiguchiTKodamaAHuangH. The influence of exhaust gas compositions in MnO2 dry DeSOx filter for diesel emission control. Environ Technol2020; 41(26): 3493–3499.
46.
PetzoldALauerPFritscheU, et al. Operation of marine diesel engines on biogenic fuels: modification of emissions and resulting climate effects. Environ Sci Technol2011; 45(24): 10394–10400.
47.
AgrawalHMalloyQGJWelchWAWayne MillerJCockerDR. In-use gaseous and particulate matter emissions from a modern ocean going container vessel. Atmos Environ2008; 42(21): 5504–5510.
48.
SippulaOStengelBSklorzM, et al. Particle emissions from a marine engine: chemical composition and aromatic emission profiles under various operating conditions. Environ Sci Technol2014; 48(19): 11721–11729.
49.
SofievMWinebrakeJJJohanssonL, et al. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nat Commun2018; 9(1): 406–412.
