The internal flow of Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) in two maritime direct fuel injector nozzles is studied by 3D flow simulations for the assessment of erosion-sensitive wall regions. The nozzle geometries differ in number, diameter and inclination angle of holes as well as sac wall curvature. Long-term endurance experiments reveal characteristic damage locations for both nozzles. Simulations are performed by a compressible density-based flow solver with a barotropic cavitation model to capture shock wave dynamics. Real geometries and the entire injection cycle with time-dependent rail pressure and transient needle movement are considered. A statistical evaluation of individual collapsing voids in terms of their condensation rate yield an erosion probability that is compared against experimental damage locations. Due to the scatter in the values of viscosity of real fuels a viscosity variation is carried out, which shows that while a lower viscosity leads to a rise of erosion probability, the location of erosion-sensitive wall zones is not significantly changed. The analysis of 3D velocity and void field evolutions motivates the introduction of distinct injection sub-phases of the entire cycle. Erosion probability is separately evaluated within each sub-phase. By this simulation procedure, experimentally found erosion spots are associated with particular sub-phases and can be traced back to characteristic flow and void structures that are linked to particular nozzle geometry features.
AhmedSMHokkirigawaKObaR. Fatigue failure of SUS 304 caused by vibratory cavitation erosion. Wear1994; 177(2): 129–137.
2.
AkhatovILindauOTopolnikovAMettinRVakhitovaNLauterbornW. Collapse and rebound of a laser-induced cavitation bubble. Phys Fluids2001; 13(10): 2805–2819.
3.
PhilippALauterbornW. Cavitation erosion by single laser-produced bubbles. J Fluid Mech1998; 361: 75–116.
4.
PayriFBermúdezVPayriRSalvadorFJ. The influence of cavitation on the internal flow and the spray characteristics in diesel injection nozzles. Fuel2004; 83(4–5): 419–431.
5.
AsiO. Failure of a diesel engine injector nozzle by cavitation damage. Eng Fail Anal2006; 13(7): 1126–1133.
6.
GreifDEdelbauerW. Application of cavitation erosion modeling within engine development process. In: International multidimensional engine modeling user’s group meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 2013.
7.
DevassyB MandumpalaEdelbauerWGreifD. Study of cavitation and 3D needle movement due to erosion in fuel injection nozzles using coupled simulation tools. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS-Asia 2016), Chennai, India, p.10.
8.
CristofaroMEdelbauerWKoukouvinisFGavaisesM. Large Eddy Simulation of the internal injector flow during pilot injection. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on cavitation (CAV2018), Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2018.
9.
KumarAGhobadianANouriJ. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of cavitating flow in a multi-hole diesel fuel injector. Int J Engine Res2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087421998631.
10.
MouvanalSBurkhardtABakshiSChatterjeeD. Numerical study of purging of a gasoline direct injection nozzle at the end of injection. Int J Engine Res2021; 22(5): 1670–1684.
11.
MohapatraCKSchmidtDPSforozoBA, et al. Collaborative investigation of the internal flow and near-nozzle flow of an eight-hole gasoline injector (engine combustion network spray g). Int J Engine Res2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087420918449
12.
HeZZhouHDuanLXuMChenZCaoT. Effects of nozzle geometries and needle lift on steadier string cavitation and larger spray angle in common rail diesel injector. Int J Engine Res2021; 22: 2673–2688.
13.
ZhangLHeZGuanWWangQSomS. Simulations on the cavitating flow and corresponding risk of erosion in diesel injector nozzles with double array holes. Int J Heat Mass Transf2018; 124: 900–911.
14.
ÖrleyFHickelSSchmidtSJAdamsNA. Large-Eddy simulation of turbulent, cavitating fuel flow inside a 9-hole diesel injector including needle movement. Int J Engine Res2017; 18(3): 195–211.
15.
BlumeMSchwarzPRuscheHWeißLWensingMSkodaR. 3D simulation of turbulent and cavitating flow for the analysis of primary breakup mechanisms in realistic diesel injection processes. Atomization Sprays2019; 29(10): 861–893.
16.
GavaisesMPapouliasDAndriotisAGiannadakisETheodorakakosA. Link between cavitation development and erosion damage in diesel injector nozzles. SAE technical paper 2007-01-0246.
17.
GreifDSrinivasanV. Numerical prediction of erosive cavitating flows in injection equipment. In: SAE technical paper 10th international conference on engines and vehicles, 2011. Capri, Napoli: SAE International.
18.
CristofaroMEdelbauerWKoukouvinisPGavaisesM. A numerical study on the effect of cavitation erosion in a diesel injector. Appl Math Model2020; 78: 200–216.
19.
GavaisesM. Flow in valve covered orifice nozzles with cylindrical and tapered holes and link to cavitation erosion and engine exhaust emissions. Int J Engine Res2008; 9(6): 435–447.
20.
FrancJP. Incubation time and cavitation erosion rate of work-hardening materials. J Fluid Eng2009; 131(2): 021303.
21.
KoukouvinisPGavaisesMLiJWangL. Large eddy simulation of diesel injector including cavitation effects and correlation to erosion damage. Fuel2016; 175: 26–39.
22.
SkodaRIbenUMorozovAMihatschMSchmidtSJAdamsNA. Numerical simulation of collapse induced shock dynamics for the prediction of the geometry, pressure and temperature impact on the cavitation erosion in micro channels. In: Warwick WIMRC 3rd international cavitation forum, Warwick, UK, 2011, p.10.
23.
SkodaRIbenUGüntnerMSchillingR. Comparison of compressible explicit density-based and implicit pressure-based CFD methods for the simulation of cavitating flows. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on cavitation (CAV2012), University of Warwick, UK, pp.576–582.
24.
EN-590:2014. Automotive fuels – diesel – requirements and test methods. European Committee for Standardization; 590: 2014–04.
25.
MitroglouNLorenziMSantiniMGavaisesM. Application of X-ray micro-computed tomography on high-speed cavitating diesel fuel flows. Exp Fluids2016; 57(11): 175.
26.
SchnerrGHSezalIHSchmidtSJ. Numerical investigation of three-dimensional cloud cavitation with special emphasis on collapse induced shock dynamics. Phys Fluids2008; 20(4): 040703.
27.
SchmidtSSezalISchnerrGTalhamerM. Riemann techniques for the simulation of compressible liquid flows with phase-transition at all Mach numbers – shock and wave dynamics in cavitating 3-D micro and macro systems. In: 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2008. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. ISBN: 978-1-62410-128-1.
28.
MottyllSSkodaR. Numerical 3D flow simulation of ultrasonic horns with attached cavitation structures and assessment of flow aggressiveness and cavitation erosion sensitive wall zones. Ultrason Sonochem2016; 31: 570–589.
29.
DeimelCSkodaR. Implementation of an explicit density-based solver for the simulation of cavitating flows in OpenFOAM. In: 9th OpenFOAM workshop, Zagreb, Croatia, 2014.
30.
BlumeMSkodaR. 3D flow simulation of a circular leading edge hydrofoil and assessment of cavitation erosion by the statistical evaluation of void collapses and cavitation structures. Wear2019; 428–429: 457–469.
31.
SchreinerFPaepenmöllerSSkodaR. 3D flow simulations and pressure measurements for the evaluation of cavitation dynamics and flow aggressiveness in ultrasonic erosion devices with varying gap widths. Ultrason Sonochem2020; 67: 105091.
32.
PaepenmöllerSKuhlmannJBlumeMSkodaR. Publication year: 2018Assessment of flow aggressiveness at an ultrasonic horn cavitation erosion test device by PVDF pressure measurements and 3D flow simulations. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on cavitation (CAV2018), Baltimore, MD, USA.
33.
JasakHWellerHGGosmanAD. High resolution NVD differencing scheme for arbitrarily unstructured meshes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids1999; 31(2): 431–449.
34.
HartenA. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J Comput Phys1983; 49(3): 357–393.
35.
IbenU. Modeling of cavitation. Syst Anal Model Simul2002; 42(9): 1283–1307.
36.
HosbachMSkodaRSanderTLeuteritzUPfitznerM. On the temperature influence on cavitation erosion in micro-channels. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2020; 117: 110140.
37.
KoukouvinisPNaseriHGavaisesM. Performance of turbulence and cavitation models in prediction of incipient and developed cavitation. Int J Engine Res2017; 18(4): 333–350.
38.
EgererCPSchmidtSJHickelSAdamsNA. Efficient implicit LES method for the simulation of turbulent cavitating flows. J Comput Phys2016; 316: 453–469.
39.
BebanBSchmidtSJAdamsNA. Numerical study of submerged cavitating throttle flows. Atomization Sprays2017; 27(8): 723–739.
40.
BebanB. Numerical simulation of submerged cavitating throttle flows. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Munich, 2019.
41.
DularMStoffelBŠirokB. Development of a cavitation erosion model. Wear2006; 261(5–6): 642–655.
42.
DularMCoutier-DelgoshaO. Numerical modelling of cavitation erosion. Int J Numer Methods Fluids2009; 61(12): 1388–1410.
43.
PetersASagarHLantermannUel MoctarO. Numerical modelling and prediction of cavitation erosion. Wear2015; 338–339: 189–201.
44.
PetersALantermannUel MoctarO. Numerical prediction of cavitation erosion on a ship propeller in model- and full-scale. Wear2018; 408–409: 1–12.
45.
Fortes PatellaRChallierGReboudJLArcherA. Cavitation erosion mechanism: numerical simulations of the interaction between pressure waves and solid boundaries. In: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on cavitation (CAV2001), Pasadena, CA, USA, 2001, p.8.
46.
BarkGGrekulaMBensowRBerchicheN. On some physics to consider in numerical simulation of erosive cavitation. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on cavitation (CAV2009), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2009, p.16.
47.
SchenkeSvan TerwisgaTJC. An energy conservative method to predict the erosive aggressiveness of collapsing cavitating structures and cavitating flows from numerical simulations. Int J Multiphase Flow2019; 111: 200–218.
48.
ArabnejadMHSvennbergUBensowRE. Numerical assessment of cavitation erosion risk using incompressible simulation of cavitating flows. Wear2021; 464–465: 203529.
49.
MihatschMSSchmidtSJAdamsNA. Cavitation erosion prediction based on analysis of flow dynamics and impact load spectra. Phys Fluids2015; 27(10): 103302.
50.
KoukouvinisPKarathanassisIKGavaisesM. Prediction of cavitation and induced erosion inside a high-pressure fuel pump. Int J Engine Res2018; 19(3): 360–373.
51.
BrunhartMSoteriouCDaveauCGavaisesMKoukouvinisPWinterbournM. Cavitation erosion risk indicators for a thin gap within a diesel fuel pump. Wear2020; 442–443: 203024.
52.
PieglLTillerW. The Nurbs Book (monographs in visual communication). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1995.
53.
GoldMPearsonRTurnerJ, et al. Simulation and measurement of transient fluid phenomena within diesel injection. Int J Adv Cur Prac Mobility2019; 1: 291–305.
54.
BreuerMPellerNRappCManhartM. Flow over periodic hills – numerical and experimental study in a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Comput Fluids2009; 38(2): 433–457.
55.
FröhlichJMellenCPRodiWTemmermanLLeschzinerMA. Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. J Fluid Mech2005; 526: 19–66.
56.
DernotteJHespelCFoucherFHouilléSMounaïm-RousselleC. Influence of physical fuel properties on the injection rate in a diesel injector. Fuel2012; 96: 153–160.
57.
DesantesJMSalvadorFJCarreresMMartínez-LópezJ. Large-eddy simulation analysis of the influence of the needle lift on the cavitation in diesel injector nozzles. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2015; 229(4): 407–423.
58.
MitroglouNMcLornMGavaisesMSoteriouCWinterbourneM. Instantaneous and ensemble average cavitation structures in diesel micro-channel flow orifices. Fuel2014; 116: 736–742.
59.
CruaCHeikalMRGoldMR. Microscopic imaging of the initial stage of diesel spray formation. Fuel2015; 157: 140–150.
60.
SchreinerFMottyllSSkodaR. A method for the coupling of compressible 3D flow simulations with a cavitation erosion model for ductile materials and assessment of the incubation time. In: Proceedings of the VIII international conference on computational methods in marine engineering, Gothenborg, Sweden, pp.83–98.
61.
HattoriSHiroseTSugiyamaK. Prediction method for cavitation erosion based on measurement of bubble collapse impact loads. Wear2010; 269(7-8): 507–514.
62.
KrauseDThörnigP. JURECA: modular supercomputer at Jülich Supercomputing Centre. JLSRF2018; 4: A132.
63.
Jülich Supercomputing Centre. JUWELS: modular tier-0/1 supercomputer at Jülich supercomputing Centre. JLSRF2019; 5: A135.
