The role of nozzle diameter on diesel combustion is studied by performing computational fluid dynamics calculations of Spray A and Spray D from the Engine Combustion Network. These are well-characterized single-hole sprays in a quiescent environment chamber with thermodynamic conditions representative of modern diesel engines. First, the inert spray evolution is described with the inclusion of the concept of mixing trajectories and local residence time into the analysis. Such concepts enable the quantification of the mixing rate, showing that it decreases with the increase in nozzle diameter. In a second step, the reacting spray evolution is studied focusing on the local heat release rate distribution during the auto-ignition sequence and the quasi-steady state. The capability of a well-mixed-based and a flamelet-based combustion model to predict diesel combustion is also assessed. On one hand, results show that turbulence–chemistry interaction has a profound effect on the description of the reacting spray evolution. On the other hand, the mixing rate, characterized in terms of the local residence time, drives the main changes introduced by the increase of the nozzle diameter when comparing Spray A and Spray D.
PickettLMSiebersDL. An investigation of diesel soot formation processes using micro-orifices. P Combust Inst2002; 29: 655–662.
2.
PickettLMSiebersDL. Orifice diameter effects on diesel fuel jet flame structure. J Eng Gas Turb Power2005; 127: 187.
3.
DuCAnderssonSAnderssonM. Two-dimensional measurements of soot in a turbulent diffusion diesel flame: the effects of injection pressure, nozzle orifice diameter, and gas density. Combust Sci Technol2018; 190: 1659–1688.
4.
PastorJVGarcia-OliverJMGarciaAMorales LópezA. An experimental investigation on spray mixing and combustion characteristics for spray C/D nozzles in a constant pressure vessel. In: International powertrains, fuels & lubricants meeting, Heidelberg, 17–19 September 2018. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
5.
IshibashiRTsuruD. An optical investigation of combustion process of a direct high-pressure injection of natural gas. J Mar Sci Technol2017; 22: 447–458.
6.
PangKMJangiMBaiX-SSchrammaJWaltherJH. Effects of nozzle diameter on diesel spray flames: a numerical study using an Eulerian Stochastic field method. Enrgy Proced2017; 142: 1028–1033.
IdicheriaCAPickettLM. Quantitative mixing measurements in a vaporizing diesel spray by Rayleigh imaging. SAE technical paper 2007-01-0647, 2007.
9.
PickettLMManinJGenzaleCLSiebersDLMusculusMPBIdicheriaCA. Relationship between diesel fuel spray vapor penetration/dispersion and local fuel mixture fraction. SAE Int J Engines2011; 4: 764–799.
10.
García-OliverJMMalbecL-MTodaHBBruneauxG. A study on the interaction between local flow and flame structure for mixing-controlled diesel sprays. Combust Flame2017; 179: 157–171.
11.
DahmsRNPaczkoGASkeenSAPickettLM. Understanding the ignition mechanism of high-pressure spray flames. P Combust Inst2017; 36: 2615–2623.
12.
GimenoJMartí-AldaravíPCarreresMPerazaJE. Effect of the nozzle holder on injected fuel temperature for experimental test rigs and its influence on diesel sprays. Int J Engine Res2018; 19: 374–389.
13.
MatusikKEDukeDJKastengrenALSovisNSwantekABPowellCF. High-resolution X-ray tomography of Engine Combustion Network diesel injectors. Int J Engine Res2018; 19: 963–976.
14.
TsangC-WKuoC-WTrujilloMRutlandC. Evaluation and validation of large-eddy simulation sub-grid spray dispersion models using high-fidelity volume-of-fluid simulation data and Engine Combustion Network experimental data. Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 13 May 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1468087418772219.
15.
OwoyeleOKunduPAmeenMMEchekkiTSomS. Application of deep artificial neural networks to multi-dimensional flamelet libraries and spray flames. Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 29 March 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1468087419837770.
16.
PandurangiSSBollaMWrightYMBoulouchosKSkeenSAManinJPickettLM. Onset and progression of soot in high-pressure n-dodecane sprays under diesel engine conditions. Int J Engine Res2017; 18: 436–452.
17.
Aubagnac-KarkarDMichelJ-BColinODarabihaN. Combustion and soot modelling of a high-pressure and high-temperature dodecane spray. Int J Engine Res2018; 19: 434–448.
18.
IhmeMMaPCBravoL. Large eddy simulations of diesel-fuel injection and auto-ignition at transcritical conditions. Int J Engine Res2019; 20: 58–68.
19.
YueZReitzRD. An equilibrium phase spray model for high-pressure fuel injection and engine combustion simulations. Int J Engine Res2017; 20: 203–215.
20.
LackmannTNygrenAKarlssonAOevermannM. Investigation of turbulence–chemistry interactions in a heavy-duty diesel engine with a representative interactive linear eddy model. Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 5 December 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1468087418812319.
21.
BhattacharjeeSHaworthDC. Simulations of transient n-heptane and n-dodecane spray flames under engine-relevant conditions using a transported PDF method. Combust Flame2013; 160: 2083–2102.
22.
PeiYHawkesERKookS. Transported probability density function modelling of the vapour phase of an n-heptane jet at diesel engine conditions. P Combust Inst2013; 34: 3039–3047.
23.
PangKMJangiMBaiX-SSchrammJWaltherJH. Modelling of diesel spray flames under engine-like conditions using an accelerated Eulerian Stochastic field method. Combust Flame2018; 193: 363–383.
24.
D’ErricoGLucchiniTContinoFJangiMBhaiX-S. Comparison of well-mixed and multiple representative interactive flamelet approaches for diesel spray combustion modelling. Combust Theor Model2014; 18: 65–88.
25.
KostersAKarlssonAOevermannMD’ErricoGLucchiniT. RANS predictions of flame lift-off: comparison of a reactor and a flamelet combustion model to the well stirred approach. Combust Theor Model2015; 25: 81–106.
26.
LucchiniTD’ErricoGOnoratiAFrassoldatiAStagniAHardyG. Modeling non-premixed combustion using tabulated kinetics and different flame structure assumptions. SAE Int J Engine2017; 10: 593–607.
27.
SinghSReitzRDMusculusMPB. Comparison of the characteristic time (CTC), representative interactive flamelet (RIF), and direct integration with detailed chemistry combustion models against optical diagnostic data for multi-mode combustion in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2006-01-0055, 2006.
28.
LucchiniTD’ErricoGCerriTOnoratiAHardyG. Experimental validation of combustion models for diesel engines based on tabulated kinetics in a wide range of operating conditions. In: 13th international conference on engines & vehicles, Capri, 10–14 September 2017. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
29.
PalPKeumSImHG. Assessment of flamelet versus multi-zone combustion modeling approaches for stratified-charge compression ignition engines. Int J Engine Res2016; 17: 280–290.
POPESB. An explanation of the turbulent round-jet/plane-jet anomaly. AIAA J1978; 16: 279–281.
32.
NovellaRGarcíaAPastorJMDomenechV. The role of detailed chemical kinetics on CFD diesel spray ignition and combustion modelling. Math Comput Model2011; 54: 1706–1719.
YaoTPeiYZhongB-JSomSLuTLuoKH. A compact skeletal mechanism for n-dodecane with optimized semi-global low-temperature chemistry for diesel engine simulations. Fuel2017; 191: 339–349.
35.
PerezE. Application of a flamelet-based combustion model to diesel-like reacting sprays. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, 2019.
36.
SenecalPKPomraningERichardsKJBriggsTEChoiCYMcDavidRMPattersonMA. Multi-dimensional modeling of direct-injection diesel spray liquid length and flam lift-off length using CFD an parallel detailed chemistry. SAE technical paper 2003-01-1043, 2003.
37.
WilliamsFA. Recent advances in theoretical descriptions of turbulent diffusion flames. In: MurthySNB (ed.) Turbulent mixing in nonreactive and reactive flows 1975. Boston, MA: Springer, pp.189–208.
38.
PetersN. Turbulent combustion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
39.
PoinsotTVeynanteD. Theoretical and numerical combustion. Philadelphia, PA: RT Edwards, 2005.
40.
NaudBNovellaRPastorJMWinklingerJF. RANS modelling of a lifted H2/N2 flame using an unsteady flamelet progress variable approach with presumed PDF. Combust Flame2015; 162: 893–906.
41.
PayriRGarcía-OliverJMXuanTBardiM. A study on diesel spray tip penetration and radial expansion under reacting conditions. Appl Therm Eng2015; 90: 619–629.
42.
NarayanaswamyKPepiotPPitschH. A chemical mechanism for low to high temperature oxidation of n-dodecane as a component of transportation fuel surrogates. Combust Flame2014; 161: 866–884.
43.
KahilaHWehrfritzAKaarioOMasoulehMGMaesNSomersBVuorinenV. Large-eddy simulation on the influence of injection pressure in reacting Spray A. Combust Flame2018; 191: 142–159.
44.
PangKMJangiMBaiX-SSchrammJWaltherJHGlarborgP. Effects of ambient pressure on ignition and flame characteristics in diesel spray combustion. Fuel2019; 237: 676–685.
45.
TaglianteFPoinsotTPickettLMPepiotPMalbecL-MBruneauxGAngelbergerC. A conceptual model of the flame stabilization mechanisms for a lifted diesel-type flame based on direct numerical simulation and experiments. Combust Flame2019; 201: 65–77.
46.
KuoK. Principles of combustion. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
