This article presents the experimental validation of a quasi-two-dimensional radial turbine model able to be used in turbocharged reciprocating internal combustion engine simulations. A passenger car variable-geometry turbine has been tested under steady and pulsating flow conditions, instrumented with multiple pressure probes, temperature sensors and mass flow sensors. Using the data obtained, a pressure decomposition has been performed. The pressure at the turbine inlet and outlet has been split into forward and backward travelling waves, employing the reflected and transmitted waves to verify the goodness of the model. The experimental results have been used to compare the quasi-two-dimensional radial turbine model as well as a classic one-dimensional model. The quasi-two-dimensional code presents a good degree of correlation with the experimental results, providing better results than the one-dimensional approach, especially when studying the high-frequency spectrum.
KesginU.Effect of turbocharging system on the performance of a natural gas engine. Energ Convers Manage2005; 46(1): 11–32.
2.
TangHPennycottAAkehurstSBraceCJ.A review of the application of variable geometry turbines to the downsized gasoline engine. Int J Engine Res2015; 16(6): 810–825.
3.
PesiridisA.The application of active control for turbocharger turbines. Int J Engine Res2012; 13(4): 385–398.
4.
RomagnoliAMartinez-BotasR.Performance prediction of a nozzled and nozzleless mixed-flow turbine in steady conditions. Int J Mech Sci2011; 53(8): 557–574.
5.
PayriFSerranoJRFajardoPReyes-BelmonteMAGozalbo-BellesR.A physically based methodology to extrapolate performance maps of radial turbines. Energ Convers Manage2012; 55(0): 149–163.
6.
ChenHWinterboneD. A method to predict performance of vaneless radial turbine under steady and unsteady flow conditions. In: Proceedings of IMechE 4th international conference on turbo-chargers and turbocharging, London, 22–24 May 1990, pp. 13–22. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications.
7.
CostallAWMcDavidRMMartínez-BotasRFBainesNC.Pulse performance modelling of a twin-entry turbocharger turbine under full and unequal admission. J Turbomach2009; 133: 021005.
8.
De BellisVMarelliS. One-dimensional simulations and experimental analysis of a wastegated turbine for automotive engines under unsteady flow conditions. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2015; 229(13): 1801–1816.
9.
BohnDMoritzNWolffM. Conjugate flow and heat transfer investigation of a turbo charger: Part II – experimental results. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2003, collocated with the 2003 international joint power generation conference, Atlanta, GA, 16–19 June 2003. New York: ASME.
10.
SerranoJROlmedaPPáezAVidalF.An experimental procedure to determine heat transfer properties of turbochargers. Meas Sci Technol2010; 21(3): 035109.
11.
BurkeRCopelandCDudaTRayes-BelmoteMA.Lumped capacitance and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics conjugate heat transfer modeling of an automotive turbocharger. J Eng Gas Turbin Power2016; 138(9): 092602.
12.
OlmedaPDolzVArnauFJRayes-BelmoteMA.Determination of heat flows inside turbochargers by means of a one dimensional lumped model. Math Comput Model2013; 57(7–8): 1847–1852.
13.
SerranoJROlmedaPArnauFJRayes-BelmoteMA.Importance of heat transfer phenomena in small turbochargers for passenger car applications. SAE Int J Engines2013; 6(2): 716–728.
14.
AghaaliHÅngströmHESerranoJR.Evaluation of different heat transfer conditions on an automotive turbocharger. Int J Engine Res2015; 16(2): 137–151.
15.
SerranoJROlmedaPTiseiraAGarcía-CuevasLMLefebvreA.Theoretical and experimental study of mechanical losses in automotive turbochargers. Energy2013; 55(0): 888–898.
16.
MarelliSGandolfiSCapobiancoM. Experimental and numerical analysis of mechanical friction losses in automotive turbochargers. SAE technical paper 2016-01-1026, 2016.
17.
SerranoJROlmedaPTiseiraAGarcía-CuevasL.Importance of mechanical losses modeling in the performance prediction of radial turbochargers under pulsating flow conditions. SAE Int J Engines2013; 6(2): 729–738.
18.
GalindoJFajardoPNavarroRGarcía-CuevasLM.Characterization of a radial turbocharger turbine in pulsating flow by means of CFD and its application to engine modeling. Appl Energ2013; 103: 116–127.
19.
GalindoJHoyasSFajardoPNavarroR.Set-up analysis and optimization of CFD simulations for radial turbines. Eng Appl Comp Fluid2013; 7(4): 441–460.
20.
HakeemISuCCCostallAMartinez-BotasRF.Effect of volute geometry on the steady and unsteady performance of mixed-flow turbines. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2007; 221: 535–550.
21.
HuX.An advanced turbocharger model for the internal combustion engine. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2000.
22.
KingA.A turbocharger unsteady performance model for the GT-power internal combustion engine simulation. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2000.
23.
RajooSMartinez-BotasRF.Variable geometry mixed flow turbine for turbochargers: an experimental study. Int J Fluid Mach Syst2008; 1(1): 155–168.
24.
HohenbergKGNewtonPJMartinez-BotasRHalamekMMaedaKBouillyJ. Development and experimental validation of a low order turbine model under highly pulsating flow. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2017: turbomachinery technical conference and exposition, Charlotte, NC, 26–20 June 2017. New York: ASME.
TorregrosaAJBroatchANavarroRGarcía-TíscarJ.Acoustic characterization of automotive turbocompressors. Int J Engine Res2015; 16(1): 31–37.
27.
LeufvénOErikssonL.Measurement, analysis and modeling of centrifugal compressor flow for low pressure ratios. Int J Engine Res2016; 17(2): 153–168.
28.
GalindoJTiseiraANavarroRTariD.Effect of the inlet geometry on performance, surge margin and noise emission of an automotive turbocharger compressor. Appl Therm Eng2017; 110: 875–882.
29.
GalindoJTiseiraAFajardoPGarcía-CuevasLM.Development and validation of a radial variable geometry turbine model for transient pulsating flow applications. Energ Convers Manage2014; 85: 190–203.
30.
DingZZhugeWZhangYChenHMartinez-BotasRYangM.A one-dimensional unsteady performance model for turbocharger turbines. Energy2017; 132: 341–355.
31.
GodunovSK.A difference scheme for numerical solution of discontinuous solution of hydrodynamic equations. Math Sbornik1959; 47: 271–306.
32.
ToroESpruceMSpearesW.Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver. Shock Waves1994; 4(1): 25–34.
33.
Van LeerB. Towards the ultimate conservation difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme. J Comput Phys1974; 14: 361.
34.
CourantRFriedrichsKLewyH.Über die partiellen differenzengleichungen der mathematischen physik. Math Annal1928; 100(1): 32–74.
35.
ChiongMRajooSRomagnoliACostallAWMartinez-BotascRF.Non-adiabatic pressure loss boundary condition for modelling turbocharger turbine pulsating flow. Energ Convers Manage2015; 93: 267–281.
36.
SerranoJRArnauFJGarcía-CuevasLMDombrovskyATartoussiH.Development and validation of a radial turbine efficiency and mass flow model at design and off-design conditions. Energ Convers Manage2016; 128: 281–293.
37.
SerranoJRArnauFJDolzVTiseiraACervelloC.A model of turbocharger radial turbines appropriate to be used in zero- and one-dimensional gas dynamics codes for internal combustion engines modelling. Energ Convers Manage2008; 49(12): 3729–3745.
38.
J1723_199508. Supercharger testing standard.
39.
J1826_199503. Turbocharger gas stand test code.
40.
PineroGVergaraLDesantesJMBroatchA.Estimation of velocity fluctuation in internal combustion engine exhaust systems through beamforming techniques. Meas Sci Technol2000; 11(11): 1585.
41.
WelchP.The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE T Acoust Speech1967; 15: 70–73.
42.
HarrisF.On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proc IEEE1978; 66: 51–83.
