Due to their capability to capture cycle-to-cycle variations and sporadically occurring phenomena such as misfire and knock, scale-resolving simulations are becoming more and more important for internal combustion engine simulations. Compared to the frequently used unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approaches, scale-resolving simulations require significantly greater computational costs due to their high spatial and temporal resolution as well as the need to compute several cycles to obtain sufficient statistics. It is well established that the appropriate treatment of boundary conditions is crucial in scale-resolving simulations and both temporally and spatially resolved fluctuations must be prescribed. However, different port modeling strategies can be found in the literature, especially with respect to the extent of the computational domain (boundary close to the flange vs. the entire system up to the plenum) and the numerical treatment of the intake/exhaust when the valves are closed (enabled vs. disabled). This study compares three different port modeling strategies, namely a long ports version, a short ports version and a version with short and temporarily disabled ports based on the well-established Darmstadt benchmark engine. The aim is to identify the requirements for scale-resolving simulations in terms of the treatment of the intake and the exhaust ports to obtain accurate statistics (mean and variance) and cycle-to-cycle variations of the in-cylinder flow field.
BuhlSGleissFKöhlerMHartmannFMessigDBrückerCHasseC. A combined numerical and experimental study of the 3D tumble structure and piston boundary layer development during the intake stroke of a gasoline engine. Flow Turbul Combust2016; 98(2): 579–600.
2.
BuhlSHartmannFHasseC. Identification of large-scale structure fluctuations in IC engines using POD-based conditional averaging. Oil Gas Sci Technol2016; 71(1): 16.
3.
HasseCSohmVDurstB. Detached eddy simulation of cyclic large scale fluctuations in a simplified engine setup. Int J Heat Fluid Fl2009; 30(1): 32–43.
4.
VoisineMThomasLBoŕeeJReyP. Spatiotemporal structure and cycle to cycle variations of an incylinder tumbling flow. Exp Fluids2011; 50(5): 1393–1407.
5.
FontanesiSd’AdamoARutlandC. Large-eddy simulation analysis of spark configuration effect on cycle-to-cycle variability of combustion and knock. Int J Engine Res2015; 16(3): 403–418.
6.
LecocqGRichardSMichelJVervischL. A new LES model coupling flame surface density and tabulated kinetics approaches to investigate knock and pre-ignition in piston engines. P Combust Inst2011; 33(2): 3105–3114.
7.
RutlandC. Large-eddy simulations for internal combustion engines—a review. Int J Engine Res2011; 12(5): 421–451.
8.
HasseC. Scale-resolving simulations in engine combustion process design based on a systematic approach for model development. Int J Engine Res2016; 17(1): 44–62.
9.
MontorfanoAPiscagliaFSchmittMWrightYFrouzakisCTomboulidesAet al. Comparison of direct and large eddy simulations of the turbulent flow in a valve/piston assembly. Flow Turbul Combust2015; 95(2–3): 461–480.
10.
ToledoMLe PenvenLBuffatMCadiouAPadillaJ. Large eddy simulation of the generation and breakdown of a tumbling flow. Int J Heat Fluid Fl2007; 28(1): 113–126.
11.
FontanesiSPaltrinieriSd’AdamoADurantiS. Investigation of boundary condition and field distribution effects on the cycle-to-cycle variability of a turbocharged GDI engine using LES. Oil Gas Sci Technol2014; 69(1): 107–128.
12.
GoryntsevDSadikiAKleinMJanickaJ. Analysis of cyclic variations of liquid fuel-air mixing processes in a realistic DISI IC-engine using large eddy simulation. Int J Heat Fluid Fl2010; 31(5): 845–849.
13.
HasseCSohmVDurstB. Numerical investigation of cyclic variations in gasoline engines using a hybrid URANS/LES modeling approach. Comput Fluids2010; 39(1): 25–48.
14.
LiuKHaworthDYangXGopalakrishnanV. Large-eddy simulation of motored flow in a two-valve piston engine: POD analysis and cycle-to-cycle variations. Flow Turbul Combust2013; 91(2): 373–403.
15.
MittalVKangSDoranECookDPitschH. LES of gas exchange in IC engines. Oil Gas Sci Technol2014; 69(1): 29–40.
16.
YuRBaiX. A semi-implicit scheme for large eddy simulation of piston engine flow and combustion. Int J Numer Meth Fl2013; 71(1): 13–40.
17.
EnauxBGranetVVermorelOLacourCPeraCAngelbergerCPoinsotT. LES study of cycle-tocycle variations in a spark ignition engine. P Combust Inst2011; 33(2): 3115–3122.
18.
KuoTYangXGopalakrishnanVChenZ. Large eddy simulation (LES) for IC engine flows. Oil Gas Sci Technol2014; 69(1): 61–81.
19.
BaumEPetersonBBöhmBDreizlerA. On the validation of LES applied to internal combustion engine flows: part 1: comprehensive experimental database. Flow Turbul Combust2014; 92(1–2): 269–297.
20.
MenterFEgorovY. The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: theory and model description. Flow Turbul Combust2010; 85(1): 113–138.
RottaJ. Turbulente Strömungen. Göttinger Klassiker der Strömungsmechanik. Book Thesis, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 2010.
23.
EgorovYMenterFLechnerRCokljatD. The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 2: application to complex flows. Flow Turbul Combust2010; 85(1): 139–165.
24.
LuciusABrennerG. Unsteady CFD simulations of a pump in part load conditions using scale-adaptive simulation. Int J Heat Fluid Fl2010; 31(6): 1113–1118.
25.
SchaeferPGampertMGoebbertJWangLPetersN. Testing of model equations for the mean dissipation using Kolmogorov flows. Flow Turbul Combust2010; 85(2): 225–243.
26.
DavidsonL. Evaluation of the SST-SAS model: channel flow, asymmetric diffuser and axi-symmetric hill. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computational fluid dynamics (eCCOMAS CFD 2006), Egmond aan Zee, 5–8 September 2006. Delft: Delft University of Technology; European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences (ECCOMAS).
27.
ShurMSpalartPStreletsMTravinA. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. Int J Heat Fluid Fl2008; 29(6): 1638–1649.
28.
RaithbyGSchneiderG. Numerical solution of problems in incompressible fluid flow: treatment of the velocity-pressure coupling. Numer Heat Tr A: Appl1979; 2(4): 417–440.
29.
RawM. Robustness of coupled algebraic multigrid for the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA J1996; 96: 29.
30.
Van DoormaalJRaithbyG. Enhancement of the simple method for predicting incompressible fluid flow. Numer Heat Transfer1984; 7(2): 147–163.
31.
RhieCChowW. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J1983; 21(11): 1525–1532.
32.
TravinAShurMStreletsMSpalartP. Physical and numerical upgrades in the detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. In: FriedrichRRodiW (eds) Advances in LES of complex flows, fluid mechanics and its applications, vol. 65. Berlin: Springer, 2004, pp.239–254.
33.
HartmannFBuhlSGleißFBarthPSchildMKaiserSHasseC. Spatially resolved experimental and numerical investigation of the flow through the intake port of an IC engine. Oil Gas Sci Technol2016; 71(1): 2.
34.
HasseCSohmVWetzelMDurstB. Hybrid URANS/LES turbulence simulation of vortex shedding behind a triangular flameholder. Flow Turbul Combust2009; 83(1): 1–20.
35.
DavidsonL. Using isotropic synthetic fluctuations as inlet boundary conditions for unsteady simulations. Adv Appl Fluid Mech2007; 1(1): 1–35.
VermorelORichardSColinOAngelbergerCBenkenidaAVeynanteD. Towards the understanding of cyclic variability in a spark ignited engine using multi-cycle LES. Combust Flame2009; 156(8): 1525–1541.
ManiA. Analysis and optimization of numerical sponge layers as a nonreflective boundary treatment. J Comput Phys2012; 231(2): 704–716.
40.
RichardsSZhangXChenXNelsonPA. The evaluation of non-reflecting boundary conditions for duct acoustic computation. J Sound Vib2004; 270(3): 539–557.
41.
BaumannMDi MareFJanickaJ. On the validation of large eddy simulation applied to internal combustion engine flows part II: numerical analysis. Flow Turbul Combust2013; 92(1–2): 299–317.
