A close-coupled double injection strategy with two 0.5-ms injections separated by a 0.5-ms dwell is implemented. Studies are performed in a constant volume pre-burn type combustion vessel over two ambient temperatures (900 and 800 K) at constant density (22.8 kg/m3) with 15% O2 by volume in the ambient. The aim of this work is to investigate the establishment and dependence of ignition delay and flame stabilization on the ambient temperature conditions especially for the main injection, and thereby investigating eventual soot production. Simultaneous schlieren and planar laser -induced fluorescence experiments as well as three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged numerical simulation computational fluid dynamic modeling with chemical kinetics in every computational fluid dynamic cell were performed. It was observed experimentally that at 900 K, the second injection is injected in a high-temperature combustion recessed ambient of the first injection whereas at 800 K it is injected in a low temperature, possibly reactive species environment. It was found from Reynolds-averaged numerical simulation modeling that combustion recession at 900 K in the present case entails rich presence of hydroxyl radical species and also the ambient of 800 K is source of reactive radicals like peroxides, leading to acceleration of main ignition. Flame stabilization of the second injection occurs closer to the injector due to short ignition delays with flame being sustained in the fuel–air premixing zone. Flame stabilization of the second injection was found to follow a premixed flame propagation mechanism. Investigation in mixture fraction and temperature space of pilot-main spray combustion revealed that the lower lift-off of main results in lower air-entrainment which causes richer ignition of main resulting in quicker and higher soot formation. The effect of the second injection in enhancing the oxidation of soot from the first injection by inducing enhanced mixing was also revealed.
TowTPierpontDReitzRD.Reducing particulate and NOx emissions by using multiple injections in a heavy duty DI diesel engine. SAE technical paper 940897, 1994.
2.
O’ConnorJMusculusM.In-cylinder mechanisms of soot reduction by close-coupled post-injections as revealed by imaging of soot luminosity and planar laser-induced soot incandescence in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines2014; 7: 673–693.
3.
O’ConnorJMusculusM.Post injections for soot reduction in diesel engines: a review of current understanding. SAE Int J Engines2013; 6: 400–421.
4.
O’ConnorJMusculusM.Optical investigation of the reduction of unburned hydrocarbons using close-coupled post injections at LTC conditions in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines2013; 6: 379–399.
5.
MendezSThirouardB.Using multiple injection strategies in diesel combustion: potential to improve emissions, noise and fuel economy trade-off in low CR engines. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr2009; 1: 662–674.
6.
MartinDStratmannJPischkePKneerRLaiM-C.Experimental investigation of the interaction of multipleGDI injections using laser diagnostics. SAE Int J Engines2010; 3: 372–388.
7.
ImaokaYShoujiKInoueTNodaT.A study of a multistage injection mechanism for improving the combustion of direct-injection gasoline engines. SAE Int J Engines2015; 8: 1080–1087.
8.
DürnholzMEndresHFrisseP.Preinjection a measure to optimize the emission behavior of DI-diesel engine. SAE technical paper 940674, 1994.
9.
ChenSK. Simultaneous reduction of NOx and particulate emissions by using multiple injections in a small diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2000-01-3084, 2000.
10.
YueZHesselRReitzRD. CFD study of soot reduction mechanisms of post-injection in spray combustion. SAE technical paper 2015-01-0794, 2015.
11.
SkeenSAManinJPickettLMCenkerEBruneauxGKondoK. A progress review on soot experiments and modeling in the engine combustion network (ECN). SAE Int J Engines2016; 9: 883–898.
12.
IdicheriaCAPickettLM.Soot formation in diesel combustion under high-EGR conditions. Livermore, CA: Sandia National Laboratories, 2005.
13.
MusculusMPDecJETreeDR. Effects of fuel parameters and diffusion flame lift-off on soot formation in a heavy-duty DI diesel engine. SAE technical paper 2002-01-0889, 2002.
14.
SiebersDLHigginsB. Flame lift-off on direct-injection diesel sprays under quiescent conditions. SAE technical paper 2001-01-0530, 2001.
15.
PickettLMSiebersDLIdicheriaCA. Relationship between ignition processes and the lift-off length of diesel fuel jets. SAE technical paper 2005-01-3843, 2005.
16.
HesselRReitzRDMusculusMO’ConnorJFlowersD.A CFD study of post injection influences on soot formation and oxidation under diesel-like operating conditions. SAE Int J Engines2014; 7: 694–713.
17.
MuellerCJPickettLSiebersDPitzWWestbrookCMartinG.Effects of oxygenates on soot processes in DI diesel engines: experiments and numerical simulations. SAE technical paper 2003-01-1791, 2003.
18.
PeiYHawkesERKookSGoldinGMLuT.Modelling n-dodecane spray and combustion with the transported probability density function method. Combust Flame2015; 162: 2006–2019.
19.
AbrahamJ.Critical observations on the modeling of nonreacting and reacting diesel sprays. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2015; 229: 1543–1565.
20.
HesselRReitzRDYueZMusculusMPO’ConnorJ.Applying advanced CFD analysis tools to study differences between start-of-main and start-of-post injection flow, temperature and chemistry fields due to combustion of main-injected fuel. SAE Int J Engines2015; 8: 2159–2176.
21.
BruneauxGMaligneD.Study of the mixing and combustion processes of consecutive short double diesel injections. SAE Int J Engines2009; 2: 1151–1169.
22.
SkeenSManinJPickettLM.Visualization of ignition processes in high-pressure sprays with multiple injections of n-dodecane. SAE Int J Engines2015; 8: 696–715.
23.
PickettLMKookSWilliamsTC.Visualization of diesel spray penetration, cool-flame, ignition, high-temperature combustion, and soot formation using high-speed imaging. SAE Int J Engines2009; 2: 439–459.
24.
CungKMoizAJohnsonJLeeS-YKweonC-BMontanaroA.Spray–combustion interaction mechanism of multiple-injection under diesel engine conditions. P Combust Inst2015; 35: 3061–3068.
25.
FelschCGaudingMHasseCVogelSPetersN.An extended flamelet model for multiple injections in DI Diesel engines. P Combust Inst2009; 32: 2775–2783.
26.
GongCJangiMBaiX-S.Diesel flame lift-off stabilization in the presence of laser-ignition: a numerical study. Combust Theor Model2015; 19: 696–713.
27.
KokjohnSLReitzRD.Investigation of the roles of flame propagation, turbulent mixing, and volumetric heat release in conventional and low temperature diesel combustion. J Eng Gas Turb Power2011; 133: 102805.
28.
MeijerMSomersBJohnsonJNaberJLeeS-YMalbecLM. Engine combustion network (ECN): characterization and comparison of boundary conditions for different combustion vessels. Atomization Spray2012; 22: 777–806.
29.
MoizAAAmeenMMLeeS-YSomS.Study of soot production for double injections of n-dodecane in CI engine-like conditions. Combust Flame2016; 173: 123–131.
30.
SkeenSAManinJPickettLM.Simultaneous formaldehyde PLIF and high-speed schlieren imaging for ignition visualization in high-pressure spray flames. P Combust Inst2015; 35: 3167–3174.
31.
RichardsKSenecalPPomraningE.Converge 2.1.0 theory manual. Middleton, WI: Convergent Science, 2012.
32.
MoizAASomSBravoLLeeS-Y. Experimental and numerical studies on combustion model selection for split injection spray combustion. SAE technical paper 2015-01-0374, 2015.
33.
YaoTPeiYZhongB-JSomSLuT. A hybrid mechanism for n-dodecane combustion with optimized low-temperature chemistry. In: Proceedings of the 9th US national combustion meeting, Cincinnati, OH, 17–20May2015.
34.
NagleJStrickland-ConstableR. Oxidation of carbon between 1000–2000 °C. In: Proceedings of the fifth carbon conference, University Park, PA, 1961, pp.154–164. New York: Pergamon Press.
35.
HiroyasuHKadotaT.Models for combustion and formation of nitric oxide and soot in direct injection diesel engines. SAE technical paper760129, 1976.
36.
PickettLBruneauxGPayriR.Engine combustion network. Livermore, CA: Sandia National Laboratories, 2014, http://www.ca.sandia.gov/ecn
PickettLMSiebersDL.Non-sooting, low flame temperature mixing controlled DI diesel combustion. SAE technical paper 2004-01-1399, 2004.
39.
IdicheriaCAPickettLM.Formaldehyde visualization near lift-off location in a diesel jet. SAE technical paper 2006-01-3434, 2006.
40.
LachauxTMusculusMP.In-cylinder unburned hydrocarbon visualization during low-temperature compression-ignition engine combustion using formaldehyde PLIF. P Combust Inst2007; 31: 2921–2929.
41.
BruneauxG.Combustion structure of free and wall-impinging diesel jets by simultaneous laser-induced fluorescence of formaldehyde, poly-aromatic hydrocarbons, and hydroxides. Int J Engine Res2008; 9: 249–265.
42.
GordonRLMasriARPopeSBGoldinGM.A numerical study of auto-ignition in turbulent lifted flames issuing into a vitiated co-flow. Combust Theor Model2007; 11: 351–376.
43.
GordonRLMasriARPopeSBGoldinGM.Transport budgets in turbulent lifted flames of methane autoigniting in a vitiated co-flow. Combust Flame2007; 151: 495–511.
44.
BlocquetMSchoemaeckerCAmedroDHerbinetOBattin-LeclercFFittschenC.Quantification of OH and HO2 radicals during the low-temperature oxidation of hydrocarbons by Fluorescence Assay by Gas Expansion technique. P Natl Acad Sci USA2013; 110: 20014–20017.
45.
AmeenMMAbrahamJ. RANS and LES study of lift-off physics in reacting diesel jets. SAE technical paper 2014-01-1118, 2014.
46.
BajajCAmeenMAbrahamJ.Evaluation of an unsteady flamelet progress variable model for autoignition and flame lift-off in diesel jets. Combust Sci Technol2013; 185: 454–472.
47.
CampbellJGosmanAHardyG.Analysis of premix flame and lift-off in diesel spray combustion using multi-dimensional CFD. SAE Int J Engines2009; 1: 571–590.
48.
EchekkiTChenJH.Direct numerical simulation of autoignition in non-homogeneous hydrogen-air mixtures. Combust Flame2003; 134: 169–191.
49.
LyonsKM.Toward an understanding of the stabilization mechanisms of lifted turbulent jet flames: experiments. Prog Energ Combust2007; 33: 211–231.
