This article is aimed at exploring syngas as an alternative fuel for the modern gas engines. It presents the experimental results on the effect of start of injection on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct-injection spark-ignition engine powered by syngas of H2/CO composition. The engine was operated with wide open throttle at minimum advance to achieve maximum brake torque. Two different start of injections were selected to represent before and after inlet valve closing and the excess air ratio (λ) was set at 2.3. The engine operation at start of injection = 120° before top dead center was found to be best for combustion and performance at speed up to 2100 r/min. At engine speed higher than 2100 r/min, this start of injection does not permit maximum performance due to injection duration limitation. Hence, early injection at start of injection = 180° before top dead center was adopted at higher speed with better combustion and performance. Therefore, best performance of syngas in direct-injection spark-ignition engine could be attained by setting start of injection at 120° before top dead center for lower speeds and at 180° before top dead center for speed greater than 2100 r/min. Even though fast combustion of syngas suggested late injection for better combustion, performance and emissions, its lower calorific value resulted in operational limitations for direct-injection system particularly at higher speeds maintaining air–fuel ratio close to the stoichiometry.
LeahyS.Bike vs car on a hot planet. Berlin: IPS, 2011.
2.
SridharGPaulPJMukundaHS.Biomass derived producer gas as a reciprocating engine fuel—an experimental analysis. Biomass Bioenerg2001; 21: 61–72.
3.
DeckerKD.Wood gas vehicles: firewood in the fuel tank. Barcelona: Low-tech Magazine, 2010.
4.
CaoYWangYRileyJTPanW-P.A novel biomass air gasification process for producing tar-free higher heating value fuel gas. Fuel Process Technol2006; 87: 343–353.
5.
HassanSZainalZAMiskamMA.A preliminary investigation of compressed producer gas from downdraft biomass gasifier. J Appl Sci2010; 10: 406–412.
6.
YangPColumbusEPWootenJBatchelorWDBuchireddyPRYeXWeiL.Evaluation of syngas storage under different pressures and temperatures. Appl Eng Agric2009; 25: 121–128.
BasuP.Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory. Boston, MA: Elsevier, 2010, 365 pp.
9.
SarkarMKumarATumuluruJSPatilKNBellmerDD.Gasification performance of switchgrass pretreated with torrefaction and densification. Appl Energ2014; 127: 194–201.
10.
HagosFYAzizARASulaimanSA.Syngas (H2/CO) in a spark-ignition direct-injection engine. Part 1: combustion, performance and emissions comparison with CNG. Int J Hydrogen Energ2014; 39: 17884–17895.
11.
ChacarteguiRSánchezDde EscalonaJMMMuñozASánchezT.Gas and steam combined cycles for low calorific syngas fuels utilisation. Appl Energ2013; 101: 81–92.
12.
HaroPTrippeFStahlRHenrichE.Bio-syngas to gasoline and olefins via DME—a comprehensive techno-economic assessment. Appl Energ2013; 108: 54–65.
13.
RichardsGACasletonKHWeilandNT.Syngas utilization. In: LieuwenTYangVYetterR (eds) Synthesis gas combustion fundamentals and application. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2010, pp.197–222.
14.
DasappaSPaulPJMukundaHSRajanNKSSridharGSridharHV.Biomass gasification technology—a route to meet energy needs. Curr Sci India2004; 87: 908–916.
15.
SridharGSridharHVDasappaSPaulPJRajanNKSMukundaHS.Development of producer gas engines. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2005; 219: 423–438.
16.
HoekmanSKRobbinsCWangXZielinskaBSchuetzleDSchuetzleR.Characterization of trace contaminants in syngas from the thermochemical conversion of biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefin2013; 3: 271–282.
17.
GamiñoBAguillónJ.Numerical simulation of syngas combustion with a multi-spark ignition system in a Diesel Engine adapted to work at the Otto cycle. Fuel2010; 89: 581–591.
18.
MustafiNNMiragliaYCRaineRRBansalPKElderST.Spark-ignition engine performance with “Powergas” fuel (mixture of CO/H2): a comparison with gasoline and natural gas. Fuel2006; 85: 1605–1612.
19.
PapagiannakisRGRakopoulosCDHountalasDTGiakoumisEG.Study of the performance and exhaust emissions of a spark-ignited engine operating on syngas fuel. Int J Altern Propul2007; 1: 190–215.
20.
ShahASrinivasanRToSDFColumbusEP.Performance and emissions of a spark-ignited engine driven generator on biomass based syngas. Bioresour Technol2010; 101: 4656–4661.
21.
FanelliEViggianoABraccioGMagiV.On laminar flame speed correlations for H2/CO combustion in premixed spark ignition engines. Appl Energ2014; 130: 166–180.
22.
SpaethCT.Performance characteristics of a diesel fuel piloted syngas compression ignition engine. Kingston, ON, Canada: Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen’s University, 2012.
23.
KonigssonF.Advancing the limits of dual fuel combustion. Stockholm: Department of Machine Design, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 2012.
24.
AhrenfeldtJFogedEVStrandRHenriksenUB.Development and test of a new concept for biomass producer gas engines. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 2010.
25.
BoehmanALCorreOL.Combustion of syngas in internal combustion engines. Combust Sci Technol2008; 180: 1193–1206.
26.
ChoHMHeB-Q.Spark ignition natural gas engines—a review. Energy Convers Manage2007; 48: 608–618.
27.
Firmansyah. Optimization of injection parameters in compressed natural gas direct injection spark ignition engine. Tronoh, Malaysia: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 2007, p.144.
28.
MohammedSEBaharomMBAzizARAFirmansyah. The effects of fuel-injection timing at medium injection pressure on the engine characteristics and emissions of a CNG-DI engine fueled by a small amount of hydrogen in CNG. Int J Hydrogen Energ2011; 36: 11997–12006.
29.
MohammedSELBaharomMBAzizARA.Analysis of engine characteristics and emissions fueled by in-situ mixing of small amount of hydrogen in CNG. Int J Hydrogen Energ2011; 36: 4029–4037.
30.
AbdullahMAAzizARA. An experimental investigation of hydrogen combustion in a direct injection spark ignition natural gas engine. SAE paper 2009-01-1499, 2009.
31.
SahariBBAliYAhmadunFl-RAbdullahSHassanMHArisI. Development of a prototype compressed natural gas direct injection vehicle—a Malaysian experience. In: 12th IANGV conference and exhibition, Rome, 8–10 June 2010.
32.
HagosFYAzizARASulaimanSA.Methane enrichment of syngas (H2/CO) in a spark-ignition direct-injection engine: combustion, performance and emissions comparison with syngas and Compressed Natural Gas. Energy2015; 90: 2006–2015.
33.
Standard SISV. Engine power test code-spark ignition and compression ignition—gross power rating (SAE International Surface Vehicle Standard, 1996).
34.
HagosFYAzizARASulaimanSAFirmansyah. Combustion characteristics of late injected CNG in a spark ignition engine under lean operating condition. J Appl Sci2012; 12: 2368–2375.
35.
MohamadTI.Compressed natural gas direct injection (spark plug fuel injector). In: PotocnikP (ed.) Natural gas. Rijeka: Intech Open (Sciyo), 2010, pp.289–306.
36.
HassanSZainalZAMiskamMA.Performance and emission characteristics of supercharged biomass producer gas-diesel dual fuel engine. J Appl Sci2011; 11: 1606–1611.
37.
US Census Bureau. World population 1950–2050. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, 2012.
38.
HagosFYAzizARASulaimanSA. Effect of air-fuel ratio on the combustion characteristics of syngas (H2:CO) in direct-injection Spark-ignition engine. Energy Procedia2014; 61: 2567–2571.
39.
MohammedSE.Analysis of engine characteristics and emissions fueled by in-situ mixing of small amount of hydrogen in CNG. Tronoh, Malaysia: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 2011.
40.
BruntMFEmtageAL.Evaluation of IMEP routines and analysis errors. SAE paper 960609, 1996.
41.
HeywoodJB.Internal combustion engine fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill International, 1988.
42.
WisemanMW.Spark ignition engine combustion process analysis. Nottingham: Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, 1990.
43.
MohammadiAShiojiMNakaiYIshikuraWTaboE.Performance and combustion characteristics of a direct injection SI hydrogen engine. Int J Hydrogen Energ2007; 32: 296–304.
44.
MohamadTI.Compressed natural gas direct injection (spark plug fuel injector). In: PotocnikP (ed.) Natural gas. Rijeka: Intech Open (Sciyo), 2010, pp.289–306.
45.
Al-KhairiNNNaveenchandranPAzizARA. Comparison of HCCI and SI characteristics on low load CNG-DI combustion. J Appl Sci2011; 11: 1827–1832.
46.
PanchatcharamN.Homogeneous charge compression ignition combustion control by CNG direct injection. Tronoh, Malaysia: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 2011, p.167.
