ChaudhryV (2018) Capacity, debility and differential inclusion: The politics of microfinance in South India. Disability Studies Quarterly38(1). Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5995/4889.
4.
FoucaultM (1980) Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–77. New York: Pantheon Books.
5.
GroverCSoldaticK (2013) Neoliberal restructuring, disabled people and social (in)security in Australia and Britain. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research15: 216–232.
6.
KellyG (2017) Patient agency and contested notions of disability in social assistance applications in South Africa. Social Science & Medicine175: 109–116.
7.
LindqvistaRLamichhanebK (2018) Disability policies in Japan and Sweden: A comparative perspective. Journal of Disability Research13: 1–14.
8.
MartinsA (2020) Reimagining equity: Redressing power imbalances between the global north and the global south. Gender & Development28(1): 135–153. DOI: 10.1080/13552074.2020.1717172.
9.
MillerPHaywardD (2017) Social policy ‘generosity’ at a time of fiscal austerity: The strange case of Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Critical Social Policy37(1): 128–147. DOI: 10.1177/0261018316664463.
MontDPalmerMMitraS, et al. (2019) Disability identification cards: Issue in effective design. Development62(1): 96–102.
12.
Di NubilaHde PaulaA. RMarcelinoM. AMaiorI (2011, December). Evaluating the model of classification and valuation of disabilities used in Brazil and defining the elaboration and adoption of a unique model for all the country: Brazilian Interministerial Workgroup Task. BMC Public Health11(4): 1–5.