The study of how ideas and discourse evolve within international organizations is one of the most important frontiers of global social policy theory. Setting forth an ideational approach to understanding their behavior, the article argues that international organizations are more open systems than most realists and structuralists believe. Their constantly evolving discourse and ideas can directly impact domestic policy. In order to stress this reality, drawing on the case of pension privatization, the article compares these organizations with ideologically driven domestic think tanks which, as far as pension privatization is concerned, have proved much more rigid in their policy prescriptions than the World Bank and other international organizations traditionally associated with the global pension privatization campaign.
AbdelalR (2007) Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
AltmanN (2005) The Battle for Social Security: From FDR’s Vision to Bush’s Gamble. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3.
BarnettMNFinnemoreM (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BélandD (2005) Social Security: History and Politics from the New Deal to the Privatization Debate. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
5.
BélandDCoxRH (eds) (2011) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BélandDWaddanA (2012) The Politics of Policy Change: Welfare, Medicare, and Social Security Reform in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
7.
BertalanffyL (1968) General Systems Theory. New York: G Braziller.
8.
BiggsAG (2011a) Considering the Texas alternative to Social Security. Wall Street Journal, 30September.
9.
BiggsAG (2011b) Social Security: The Story of Its Past and a Vision for Its Future. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
10.
BlackburnR (2003) Banking on Death or Investing in Life: The History and Future of Pensions. London: Verso.
11.
BlythM (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BøåsMMcNeilD (eds) (2004) Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World?London: Routledge.
13.
BrooksSM (2005) Interdependent and domestic foundations of policy change: The diffusion of pension privatization around the world. International Studies Quarterly49(2): 273–294.
14.
ButlerSGermanisP (1983) Achieving ‘a Leninist strategy.’Cato Journal3(2): 547–561.
15.
CampbellJL (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
CarstensenMB (2011) Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: Bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European Political Science Review3(1): 147–167.
17.
Cato Institute (2009) Social Security. In:Cato Handbook for Policymakers, 7th edn.Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
18.
CheckelJT (2005) International institutions and socialization in Europe. International Organization59(4): 801–826.
19.
ChwierothJ (2010) Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Council of the European Union (2001) Quality and Viability of Pensions: Joint Report on Objectives and Working Methods in the Area of Pensions. 10672/01 ECOFIN 198 SOC 272. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
21.
DeaconB. and StubbsP (2011) Theorizing global social policy: Reflections and synthesis. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
DeaconB. (1997) Global Social Policy: International Organizations and the Future of Welfare. London: Sage.
23.
DionM (2008) International organizations and social insurance in Mexico. Global Social Policy8(1): 25–44.
24.
EdwardsGCIII (2007) Governing by Campaigning: The Politics of the Bush Presidency. New York: Pearson Longman.
25.
EpsteinR (2008) In Pursuit of Liberalism: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
European Commission (2010) Green Paper: Towards Adequate, Sustainable, and Safe Pensions. COM(2010)365 final. 7July. Brussels: European Commission.
27.
European Commission (2012) White Paper: An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions. COM(2012) 55 final (16.2.2012). Brussels: European Commission.
28.
FerraraPJ (1998) A New Deal for Social Security. Washington, DC: Cato Institute National Book Network.
29.
FerraraPJTannerMD (2008) Common Cents, Common Dreams: A Layman’s Guide to Social Security Privatization. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
30.
GillISPackardTYermoJ (2005) Keeping the Promise of Social Security in Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank.
31.
GoldsteinJKeohaneRO (1993) Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical framework. In: GoldsteinJKeohaneRO (eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
HallP (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. Comparative Politics25(3): 275–296.
33.
HansenRKingD (2001) Eugenic ideas, political interests, and policy variance: Immigration and sterilization policy in Britain and the U.S. World Politics53(2): 237–263.
34.
HawkinsDGLakeDANielsenDLTierneyMJ (eds) (2006) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HayC (2011) Ideas and the construction of interests. In: BélandDCoxRH (eds) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
JensonJ (1989) Paradigms and political discourse: Protective legislation in France and the United States before 1914. Canadian Journal of Political Science22(2): 235–258.
37.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
KingdonJW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn.New York: HarperCollins.
39.
KogutBMacPhersonJM (2011) The mobility of economists and the diffusion of policy ideas: The influence of economics on national policies. Research Policy40: 1307–1320.
40.
KpessaMWBélandD (2012) Transnational actors and the politics of pension reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. Review of International Political Economy19(2): 267–291.
41.
LeimgruberM (forthcoming) The three-pillar gospel: The roots of an international pension reform model, 1972–1994. Global Social Policy.
42.
LiebermanRC (2002) Ideas, institutions, and political order: Explaining political change. American Political Science Review96(4): 697–712.
43.
MadridR (2003) Retiring the State: The Politics of Pension Privatization in Latin America and Beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
MahonR (2009) The OECD’s discourse on the reconciliation of work and family life. Global Social Policy9(2): 183–204.
45.
MahonRMcBrideS (eds) (2008) The OECD and Transnational Governance. Vancouver: UBC Press.
46.
MatijascicMKayS (2006) Social security at the crossroads: Toward effective pension reform in Latin America. International Social Security Review59(1): 3–26.
47.
MehtaJ (2011) From ‘whether’ to ‘how’: The varied roles of ideas in politics. In: BélandDCoxRH (eds) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
MerrienFX (2001) The World Bank’s new social policies: Pensions. International Social Science Journal53(170): 537–550.
49.
MintromM (1997) Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 738–770.
50.
MorenoLPalierB (2005) The Europeanisation of welfare: Paradigm shifts and social policy reforms. In: Taylor-GoobyP (ed.) Ideas and Welfare State Reform in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
51.
MüllerK (1999) The Political Economy of Pension Reform in Central-Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
52.
MüllerK (2003) Privatizing Old Age Security: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
O’BrienR (2002) Organizational politics, multilateral economic organizations and social policy. Global Social Policy2(2): 141–161.
55.
OrensteinMA (2005) The new pension reform as global policy. Global Social Policy5(2): 175–202.
56.
OrensteinMA (2008) Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
OrensteinMA (2011) Pension privatization in crisis: Death or rebirth of a global policy trend?International Social Security Review64(3): 65–80.
58.
OrensteinMA (2013) Pension privatization: Evolution of a paradigm. Governance26(2): 259–281.
59.
OrszagPStiglitzJ (2001) Rethinking pension reform: Ten myths about social security systems. In: HolzmannRStiglitzJ (eds) New Ideas about Old Age Security: Towards Sustainable Pension Systems in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: World Bank.
60.
PadamseeT (2009) Culture in connection: Re-contextualizing ideational processes in the analysis of policy development. Social Politics16(4): 413–445.
61.
ParsonsC (2007) How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
PiersonP (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Pop-ElechesG (2009) From Economic Crisis to Reform: IMF Programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
RichA (2004) Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
RossF (2007) Policy histories and partisan leadership in presidential studies: The case of Social Security. In: EdwardsGC IIIDesmondSK (eds) The Polarized Presidency of George W. Bush. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
SchmidtVA (2011) Reconciling ideas and institutions through discursive institutionalism. In: BélandDCoxRH (eds) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
SchönDAReinM (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
68.
SimmonsBDobbinFGarrettG (eds) (2008) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
SkogstadG (ed.) (2011) Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism and Domestic Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
70.
SomersMBlockF (2005) From poverty to perversity: Ideas, markets, and institutions over 200 years of welfare debate. American Sociological Review70(2): 260–287.
71.
SteenslandB (2006) Cultural categories and the American welfare state: The case of guaranteed income policy. American Journal of Sociology111(5): 1273–1326.
72.
StoneDA (1997) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: WW Norton.
73.
StoneD (2004) Transfer agents and global networks in the transnationalisation of policy. Journal of European Public Policy11(3): 545–566.
74.
StoneDDenhamA (eds) (2004) Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
75.
SurelY (2000) The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy7(4): 495–512.
TannerM (2012) Still a better deal: Private investment vs. Social Security. Policy Analysis692, 13February. Available at: www.Cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=14088.
78.
TarrowS (2005) The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79.
TelesS (1998) The dialectics of trust: Ideas, finance, and pension privatization in the US and the UK. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, November.
80.
TrueJMintromM (2001) Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly45(1): 27–57.
81.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
82.
VachudovaM (2005) Europe Undivided. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83.
ValdesJG (1995) Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84.
WadeRH (1996) Japan, the World Bank, and the art of paradigm maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in political perspective. New Left ReviewI(217).
85.
WadeRH (2001) Showdown at the World Bank. New Left Review7, January–February.
86.
WadeRH (2002) US hegemony and the World Bank: The fight over people and ideas. Review of International Political Economy9(2): 215–243.
87.
WeaverRK (1989) The changing world of think tanks. PS: Political Science and Politics22(3): 563–578.
88.
WeirM (1992) Politics and Jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89.
WendtA (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90.
WeylandK (2005) Theories of policy diffusion: Lessons from Latin American pension reform. World Politics57(2): 262–295.
91.
WoodsN (2006) The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
92.
World Bank (1994) Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
93.
World Bank (2006) Pension Reform and the Development of Pension Systems: An Evaluation of World Bank Assistance: Independent Evaluation Group Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
94.
YatesN (2001) Globalization and Social Policy. London: Sage.
95.
YeeAS (1996) The causal effects of ideas on policies. International Organization50(1): 69–108.
96.
YermoJ (2002) Revised Taxonomy for Pension Funds, Pension Plans, and Pension Entities. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
