Family support workforce encompasses a diverse range of professionals, and defining the skills required for this workforce is a multifaceted challenge. A Delphi study was designed to explore the core and field-specific skills essential for family support practitioners, with a keen focus on their implications for a comprehensive model. There were three rounds, with 31 family professionals participating in the first round, and 27 in the second and third rounds. In the initial round, data were gathered to inform subsequent rounds. A comprehensive, structured questionnaire featuring Likert-type scales and ranking options was developed for the second round, encompassing 122 variables across 11 questions. The third round involved panellists responding to 15 yes-no questions, with the opportunity to provide explanations when answering negatively.
Findings
The findings of this research contribute to the development of a model that outlines family support skills, highlighting the intricate interplay between core and field-specific skills, knowledge, approaches, personal traits, and amalgam qualities within the family support workforce. These core and field-specific workforce skills are strengthened by specific knowledge and practice approaches, reinforced by practitioner traits and qualities that facilitate effective family support.
Applications
The results of the study can contribute to the development of training for future providers and to the improvement of professional competencies. Implications of this study invite for the development of plain policies regarding education, development of professional competences, and the design of family supportive organizations and services.
BradtL.RoetsG.RooseR.RosseelY.Bouverne-De BieM. (2015). Poverty and decision making in child welfare and protection: Deepening the bias-need debate. British Journal of Social Work, 7(45), 2161–2175. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu086
3.
BrassartE.PrévostC.BétriseyC.LemieuxM.DesmaraisC. (2017). Strategies developed by service providers to enhance treatment engagement by immigrant parents raising a child with a disability. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(4), 1230–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0646-8
4.
Buciuceanu-VrabieM.MešlN.ZegaracN.KodeleT. (2023). Skills in family support: Content analysis of international Organizations’ websites. Calitatea Vieții, 34(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.46841/RCV.2023.01.02
CanavanJ.PinkertonJ.DolanP. (Eds) (2016). Understanding Family Support: policy, practice and theory. Jessica Kingsley.
7.
CaseyB.HackettS. (2021). Deconstructing discourses in assessments of child neglect. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(6), 2097–2115. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab044
8.
ChandA.ThoburnJ. (2005). Research review: Child and family support services with minority ethnic families: What can we learn from research?Child & Family Social Work, 10(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00367
9.
ChristieC. A.BarelaE. (2005). The delphi technique as a method for increasing inclusion in the evaluation process. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 20(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.020.005
10.
CohenF.TrauenrichtM.FrancotR.BroekhuizenM.AndersI. (2020). Professional competencies of practitioners in family and parenting support programs. A German and Dutch case study. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105202
11.
CoxD. J. (2012). From interdisciplinary to integrated care of the child with autism: The essential role for a code of ethics. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(12), 2729–2738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1530-z
12.
DalyM.BruckhaufZ.ByrneJ.PecnikN.Samms-VaughanM.BrayR.MargariaA. (2015). Family and parenting support: Policy and provision in a global context. UNICEF.
13.
DaroD. (2019). A shift in perspective: A universal approach to child protection. The Future of Children, 29(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2019.0002
14.
DaviesK.RossN.CocksJ.FooteW. (2023). Family inclusion in child protection: Knowledge, power and resistance. Children and Youth Service Review, 147(2), 106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106860
15.
DevaneyC.ChristiansenØHolzerJ.MacDonaldM.MatiasM.PiessensA.SalamonE. (2022). Child, parent or family? Applying a systemic lens to the conceptualisations of family support in Europe. European Journal of Social Work, 26(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2146308
16.
dos SantosR.IsakovA. B.MartinsC.AntunesA. P.ZegaracN.NunesC. (2024). Professional skills in family support: A systematic review. Social Sciences, 13(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030176
17.
DunstC. J. (2017). Family systems early childhood intervention. In SukkarH.DunstC. J.KirkbyJ. (Eds), Early childhood intervention: Working with families of young children with special needs (pp. 38–60). Routledge.
18.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M.HambyD. W. (2007). Meta-analysis of family-centered help giving practices research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20176
19.
EganG. (2014). The Skilled Helper: A Problem-Management and Opportunity-Development Approach to Helping (10th ed.). Brooks/Cole.
20.
FergusonH. (2017). How children become invisible in child protection work: Findings from research into day-to-day social work practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 1007–1023. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw065
21.
ForresterD.KillianM.WestlakeD.SheehanL. (2020). Patterns of practice: An exploratory factor analysis of child and family social worker skills. Child and Family Social Work, 25(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12664
22.
FrostN.DolanP. (2012). The theoretical foundations of family support work. In DaviesM. (Ed.), Social work with children and families (pp. 40–49). Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
GilbertN. (2012). A comparative study of child welfare systems: Abstract orientations and concrete results. Child and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 532–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.014
24.
GilbertN.PartonN.SkivenesM. (2011). Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations. Oxford University Press.
25.
GilliganR. (2000). Family support issues and prospects. In CanavanJ.DonlanP.PinkertonJ. (Eds), Family support: Direction from diversity (pp. 13–35). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
26.
GladstoneJ.DumbrillG.LeslieB.KosterA.YoungM.IsmailaA. (2014). Understanding worker-parent engagement in child protection casework. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.002
27.
GreatorexJ.DexterT. (2000). An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01569.x
GypenL.VanderfaeillieJ.De MaeyerS.BelengerL.Van HolenF. (2017). Outcomes of children who grew up in foster care: Systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.035
30.
HackettS.MassonH.PhillipsS. (2003). Mapping and exploring services for young people who have sexually abused others: Final report. A two-year research project funded by Youth Justice Board, NSPCC and NOTA. University of Durham.
31.
Herrera-PastorD.FrostN.DevaneyC. (2020). Understanding contemporary family support: Reflections on theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 21(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v21i2.1420
32.
HoagwoodK. E.CavaleriM. A.Serene OlinS.BurnsB. J.SlatonE.GruttadaroD.HughesR. (2010). Family support in children’s mental health: A review and synthesis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-009-0060-5
KeeneyS.HassonF.McKennaH. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Wiley Blackwell.
35.
Kittell-LimerickP. (2005). Perceived barriers to completion of the academic doctorate: A Delphi study. (Publication No. 3196394). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas A&M University - Commerce]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
36.
KuhnE. S.LairdR. D. (2014). Family support programs and adolescent mental health: Review of evidence. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 10(5), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S48057
37.
LinstoneH. A.TuroffM.2002). The Delphi Method Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley.
38.
MassaroliA.MartiniJ.LinoM.SpenassatoD.MassaroliR. (2017). The delphi method as a methodological framework for research in nursing. Texto Contexto Enfermagem, 26(4), e1110017. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017001110017
39.
McGregorC.DevanyC. (2020). Protective support and supportive protection for families “in the middle”: Learning from the Irish context. Child & Family Social Work, 25(2), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12683
NeukrugE. (2020). Skills and Techniques for Human Service Professionals: Counselling Environment, Helping Skills, Treatment Issues (2nd ed.). Cognella.
43.
ObrochtaC.AnthonyB.ArmstrongM.KalilJ.HustJ.KernanJ. (2011). Issue brief: Family-to-family peer support: Models and evaluation. ICF Macro, Outcomes Roundtable for Children and Families.
44.
OlinS. S.WilliamsN.PollockM.ArmusewiczK.KutashK.GlissonC.HoagwoodK. E. (2013). Quality indicators for family support services and their relationship to organizational social context. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0499-z
45.
PattersonJ.WilliamsL.EdwardsT.ChamowL.Grauf-GroundsC. (2018). Essential skills in family therapy: From the first interview to termination (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
46.
RayensM. K.HahnE. J. (2000). Building consensus using the policy delphi method. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 1(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715440000100409
RogersC. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357
49.
RooseR.RoetsG.Van HouteS.VandenholeW.ReynaertD. (2013). From parental engagement to the engagement of social work services: Discussing reductionist and democratic forms of partnership with families. Child & Family Social Work, 18(4), 449–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00864.x
50.
TerryG.HayfieldN.ClarkeV.BraunV. (2017). Thematic Analysis. In WillingC.Stainton RogersW. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
51.
ThomlisonB. (2015). Family assessment handbook: An introduction and practical guide to family assessment. Cengage Learning.
52.
ThompsonE. G.KnowlesS. F.GreasleyP. (2019). Understanding resilience in young people with complex mental health needs: A Delphi study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104518794789
53.
TrevithickP. (2012). Social work skills and knowledge: a practice handbook (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
54.
TrocméN.FallonB.SinhaV.Van WertM.KozlowskiA.MacLaurinB. (2013). Differentiating between child protection and family support in the Canadian child welfare system’s response to intimate partner violence, corporal punishment, and child neglect. International Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.765571
UnwinP.HoggR. (2012). Effective social work with children and families. A skills handbook. Sage.
57.
Van HouteS.BradtL.VandenbroeckM.Bouverne-De BieM. (2014). Parent worker relationships in child welfare social work: A Belgian case study. European Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106860
58.
VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Available from maxqda.com
59.
VerhallenT.HallC. J.SlembrouckS. (2017). Family support and child protection approaches. Historicising perspectives on contemporary discourses of social work. Qualitative Social Work, 18(2), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017712798
60.
VillodasM. T.CromerK. D.MosesJ. O.LitrownikA. J.NewtonR. R.DavisI. P. (2016). Unstable child welfare permanent placements and early adolescent physical and mental health: The roles of adverse childhood experiences and post-traumatic stress. Child Abuse & Neglect, 62, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.014
61.
WhittakerK. A.MaloneM.CowleyS.GrigulisA.NicholsonC.MabenJ. (2017). Making a difference for children and families: An appreciative inquiry of health visitor values and why they start and stay in post. Health and Social Care in the Community, 25(2), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12307
62.
WilkinsD.LynchA.AntonopoulouV. (2018). A golden thread? The relationship between supervision, practice, and family engagement in child and family social work. Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12442
63.
ZegaracN.Burgund IsakovA.NunesC.AntunesA. P. (2021). Workforce skills in family support: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 31(4), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211006184
