As community respondents to disease prevention and control, social workers faced extreme demands and challenges during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Based on data collected from 762 social workers in Beijing's urban area in 2022, this study conducts a moderated mediation model with Bootstrapping analysis to investigate how their effort-reward imbalance influences their work engagement and what role professional identity and perceived performance appraisal play in this relationship.
Findings
The results show that when social workers perceive an effort-reward imbalance, their professional identities become weaker, and their work engagement decreases to avoid aggravating the imbalance. In addition, a top–down designed and controlling performance appraisal can enlarge this relationship.
Applications
Social workers, as the frontline respondents to the pandemic where high efforts are unavoidable, should be granted more rewards to correct the effort-reward imbalance. Also, any management measures, including performance management or appraisal, shall be fairly designed as a useful source, helping social workers’ improvement and acknowledging their efforts, rather than merely imposing control.
AdamsK.HeanS.SturgisP.ClarkJ. (2006). Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learning in Health and Social Care, 5(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2006.00119.x
2.
AlqahtaniM. M. (2022). The role of clinical social worker in addressing the social consequences of Coronavirus (Covid-19): A field study. Social Work in Public Health, 37(4), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2021.2015035
3.
Ambrose-MillerW.AshcroftR. (2016). Challenges faced by social workers as members of proefssionals collaborative healthcare teams. Health & Social Work, 41(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlw006
4.
AshcroftR. B.McMillanC.Ambrose-MillerW.McKeeR.BrownJ. (2018). The emerging role of social work in primary healthcare: A survey of social workers in Ontario family health teams. Health & Social Work, 43(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/41/2/101/2356236
5.
AshcroftR. B.SurD.GreenblattA.DonahueP. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social workers at the frontline: A survey of Canadian social workers. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(3), 1724–1746. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab158
6.
BaileyC.MaddenA.AlfesK.FletcherL. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12077
7.
BakkerA. B.KillmerC. H.SiegristJ.SchaufeliW. B. (2000). Effort-reward imbalance and burnout among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(4), 884–891. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01361.x
8.
BakkerA. B.SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P.TarisT. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02678370802393649
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
11.
CraigS. L.MuskatB. (2013). Bouncers, brokers, and glue: The self-described role of social workers in urban hospitals. Health & Social Work, 38(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hls064
12.
DuY.ChanT. S. (2020). Professional identity of Wuhan and Hong Kong social workers: COVID-19 challenges and implications. Qualitative Social Work, 20(1-2), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020973339
FacteauC. L.FacteauJ. D.SchoelL. C.RussellJ. E. A.PoteetM. L. (1998). Reactions of leaders to 360-degree feedback from subordinates and peers. Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(98)90010-8
15.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications.
ForenzaB.EckertC. (2018). Social worker identity: A profession in context. Social Work, 63(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12450
18.
FreyB. S. (1998). Institutions and morale: The crowding-out effect. In Ben-NerA.PuttermanL. (Eds.), Economics, Values and Organization (pp. 223–226). Cambridge University Press.
19.
GarrettP. M. (2020). Looking east: (Re-)creating a social work “industry” in the People's Republic of China. Critical Social Policy, 40(3), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018319853492
20.
GeJ.HeJ.LiuY.ZhangJ.PanJ.ZhangX.LiuD. (2021). Effects of effort-reward imbalance, job satisfaction, and work engagement on self-rated health among healthcare workers. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-22063/v1
21.
GrossM.HochbergN. (2016). Characteristics of place identity as part of professional identity development among pre-service teachers. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 1243–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9646-4
22.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based. Guilford Publications.
23.
HerzbergF. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. World Publications.
HobfollS. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
26.
HuangY.SungC.ChenW. T.LiuS. (2021). Relationships between social support, social status perception, social identity, work stress, and safety behavior of construction site management personnel. Sustainability, 13(6), 3184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063184
27.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
28.
KinmanG.JonesF. (2008). Effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment: Predicting strain in academic employees in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013213
29.
KinnunenU.FeldtT.MakikangasA. (2008). Testing the effort-reward imbalance model among Finnish managers: The role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.2.114
MalikP.GargP. (2017). Learning organization and work engagement: Exploring the nexus in Indian IT sector. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(3), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-03-2016-0034
32.
MaorR.HemiA. (2021). Relationship between role stress, pressional identity, and burnout among contemporary school counselors. Psychology in the Schools, 58(8), 1597–1610. https://doi.org/10.3102/1687276
33.
MengY.WangY.TianX. (2021). Job crafting paths for job engagement: An empirical study among Chinese social workers. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 45(2), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1873213
34.
NiuD.HaugenH. (2019). Social workers in China: Professional identity in the making. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(7), 1932–1949. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy132
35.
PocnetC.AntoniettiJ. P.MassoudiK.GyörkösC.BeckerJ.de BruinG. P.RossierJ. (2015). Influence of individual characteristics on work engagement and job stress in a sample of national and foreign workers in Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000146
36.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS And SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of Psychonomic Society, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206553
37.
RodriguesF.MogarroM. J. (2019). Student teachers’ professional identity: A review of research contribution. Educational Research Review, 28, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100286
38.
RosenbergM. S.LiY. (2018). Effort-reward imbalance and work productivity among housekeeping employees: A pilot study. Workplace Health & Safety, 66(11), 516–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079918755803
39.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.SalanovaM. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire–a cross-national study. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
40.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015630930326
SiegristJ.SiegristK.WeberI. (1986). Sociological concepts in the etiology of chronic disease: The case of ischemic heart disease. Social Science and Medicine, 22(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(86)90073-0
43.
SiegristJ.StarkeD.ChandolaT.GodinI.MarmotM.NiedhammerI.PeterR. (2004). The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine, 58(8), 1483–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(3)00351-4
44.
SiegristJ.WegeN.PuhlhoferF.WahrendorfM. (2009). A short generic measure of work stress in the era of gloalization: Effort-reward imbalance. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 82(8), 1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3
45.
SlayH.SmithD. A. (2011). Professional identity construction: Using narrative to understand the negotiation of professional and stigmatized cultural identities. Human Relations, 64(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710384290
46.
SteinheiderB.HoffmeisterV.BrunkK.GarrettT.MunozR. (2020). Dare to care: Exploring the relationships between socio-moral climate, perceived stress, and work engagement in social service agency. Journal of Social Service Research, 46(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2019.1575324
47.
TesiA.AielloA.GiannettiE. (2019). The work-related well-being of social workers: Framing job demands, psychological well-being, and work engagement. Journal of Social Work, 19(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318757397
48.
van VegchelN.de JongeJ.BosmaH.SchaufeliW. B. (2005). Reviewing the effort-reward imbalance model: Drawing up the balance of 45 empiricl studies. Social Science & Medicine, 60(5), 1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.043
49.
WangX.LiuL.ZouF.HaoJ.WuH. (2017). Association of occupational stressors, perceived organizational support, and psychological capital with work engagement among Chinese female nurses. BioMed Research International, 2017, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5284628
50.
WangC.XuJ.ZhangT.LiQ. (2020). Effects of professional identity on turnover intention in China's hotel employees: The mediating role of employee engagement and job satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.07.002
51.
WangE.ZhengZ.SuiX.YiZ.LiuH.LuanW.MengY.ShiB.ChenL. (2021). For money or identity—or both? Which could promote the retention of social workers in China?British Journal of Social Work, 51(2), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa200
52.
WatsonC. (2006). Narratives of practice and the construction of identity in teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600600832213
53.
WebbS. A. (2017). Matters of professional identity and social work. In WebbS. A. (Ed.), Professional identity and social work (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
54.
WeiW.WangC.ZhaiW.LiW. (2023). "Honor list" and "shame roll": Quasi-experimental evidence of the effect of performance feedback under political control. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac011
ZahariN.KaliannanM. (2023). Antecedents of work engagement in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(3), 557–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221106792
57.
ZhengG.ZhangX.WangY.MaM. (2021). The strengthening mechanism of the relationship between social work and public health under COVID-19 in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 9956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199956
58.
ZhouX.MaJ.DongX. (2018). Empowering supervision and service sabotage: A moderated mediation model based on conservation of resources theory. Tourism Management, 64, 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.016
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
