The complexities of refugee resettlement are difficult to comprehend, and alternative approaches to education may enhance empathy. Puppetry's art form often engages broad audiences, allowing puppets to tell important stories. This project developed a research-based educational puppet show to increase understanding of refugees in the United States (US). Using a mixed-method approach, this exploratory study (1) interviewed eleven refugees from five origin countries; (2) analyzed the interviews for salient themes; (3) developed a “master” play based on emergent themes; (4) delivered the play through puppetry; and (5) empirically assessed the efficacy of puppetry in disseminating information about refugees.
Findings
Five overarching themes regarding refugee resettlement emerged from the interviews, namely, (1) economic concerns; (2) language barriers; (3) socio-cultural differences; (4) misperceptions; and (5) altered family dynamics. Almost all 107 respondents who completed a pre- and post-show survey evidenced having gained new knowledge about resettlement in the areas of (i) refugee status; (ii) the arrival process; (iii) economic realities; (iii) adaptation issues; and (iv) refugee perceptions of opportunities in the US.
Applications
The salient findings of the interviews were consistent with extant literature on refugee resettlement and the 40-min research-based puppet show confirmed that puppetry can be an alternative, or supplementary, training tool. Puppetry brings life to didactic presentations for social workers and other service providers through effective portrayals of difficulties faced by both refugee and host in the adaptation process. It also suggests that puppetry can sensitize and educate practitioners on issues that can be controversial.
AddamsJ. (1922). Peace and bread in the time of war. Macmillan.
2.
BrellC.DustmannC.PrestonI. (2020). The labor market integration of refugee migrants in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(1), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.1.94
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (1974). Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood. Child Development, 45(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127743
ChanC.SageM. (2021). A narrative review of digital storytelling for social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 35(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2019.1692804
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–168. https://philpapers.org/archive/CREDTI.pdf?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000603
DisneyL.McPhersonJ. (2020). Understanding refugee mental health and employment issues: Implications for social work practice. Journal of Social Work in the Global Community, 5, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.5590/JSWGC.2020.5.1.02
11.
DubusN. (2022). Social workers’ views of ways to engage communities in refugee resettlement. Social Work, 67(4), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac038
FrazierE.van RiemsdijkM. (2021). When “self-sufficiency” is not sufficient: Refugee integration discourses of US resettlement actors and the offer of refuge. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 3113–3130. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa119
HitchcockL. I.ShortenA.BosworthP.GalinS.EdmondsT.HaradaC. (2020). Using a standardized patient model for interprofessional team training in social work. Advances in Social Work, 20(2), 355–370. https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/advancesinsocialwork/article/view/23664/23181 https://doi.org/10.18060/23664
ImH.SwanL. E. T. (2021). Working towards culturally responsive trauma-informed care in the refugee resettlement process: Qualitative inquiry with refugee-serving professionals in the United States. Behavioral Sciences, 11(11), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11110155
20.
KavukcuN.AltintaşK. H. (2019). The challenges of the health care providers in refugee settings: A systematic review. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 34(02), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x19000190
21.
KosnyA.YanarB.BegumM.Al-khoolyD.PremjiS.LayM. A.SmithP. A. (2020). Safe employment integration of recent immigrants and refugees. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 21(3), 807–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-019-00685-w
22.
KreitzerL.McMenemyC.YohaniS. (2022). Expanding our understanding of the environmental impacts on refugee resettlement through the application of Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory. Local Development & Society, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2022.2087046
KrystallidouD.BylundC.PypeP. (2020). The professional interpreter’s effect on empathic communication in medical consultations: A qualitative analysis of interaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(3), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.027
25.
LevensonJ. (2020). Translating trauma-informed principles into social work practice. Social Work, 65(30), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa020
MillerK.RasmussenA. (2010). War exposure, daily stressors, and mental health in conflict and postconflict settings: Bridging the divide between trauma-focused and psychosocial frameworks. Social Science & Medicine, 70(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.029
28.
MortolaP. (2019). Play becomes real for adults: Measuring effectiveness of expressive arts media for therapists in training using the oaklander approach. Gestalt Review, 23(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.5325/gestaltreview.23.1.0067
29.
NguyenP.TroeungY. (2018). Refugee compassion and the politics of embodied storytelling: A critical conversation, a/b. Auto/Biography Studies, 33(2), 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2018.1445591
OzkanB. C. (2004). Using NVivo to analyze qualitative classroom data on constructivist learning environments. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2004.1905
SegalU. A. (2016). Opportunities and challenges of return migration. In XuQ.JordanL. P. (Eds), Migrant workers: Social identity, occupational challenges and health practice (pp. 171–190). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
35.
SegalU. A. (2021). Immigrant and refugee integration. In FouskasT. (Ed.), Immigrants and refugees in times of crisis (pp. 65–90). European Public Law Organization (EPLO) Publications.
SpencerM. B. (2006). Phenomenology and Ecological Systems Theory: Development of diverse groups. In LernerR. M.DamonW. (Eds), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 829–893). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38.
SteberS.RossiS. (2021). The challenge of learning a new language in adulthood: Evidence from a multi-methodological neuroscientific approach. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246421
TilbrookA.DwyerT.Reid-SearlK.ParsonJ. A. (2017). A review of the literature – the use of interactive puppet simulation in nursing education and children’s healthcare. Nurse Education in Practice, 22, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.12.001
U.S. Department of State. (2023). The Presidential Determination on refugee admissions for fiscal year 2024. https://www.state.gov/the-presidential-determination-on-refugee-admissions-for-fiscal-year-2024/
Weiss-GalI. (2008). The person-in-environment approach: Professional ideology and practice of social workers in Israel. Social Work, 53(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.1.65
52.
WoodrowN. (2017). City of welcome: Refugee storytelling and the politics of place. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 31(6), 780–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2017.1281884
