This article indicates how to achieve empowerment in old age by promoting user participation in social services for older people. Common empowerment strategies include promoting community and political participation, the seniors’ power movement, and policy advocacy. More effective strategies for empowering older people need to be identified and explored to respond effectively to increasing global aging problems. The article discusses user participation in social services for older people as another valuable strategy and presents the values and core beliefs for promoting user participation in social services for older people.
Theoretical advances
It proposes a ladder of user participation to provide social workers with clear guidelines for creating suitable channels for involving older people in meaningful and greater participation. The proposed ladder comprises seven levels including (1) being consulted and giving feedback; (2) increasing opportunities for service users to make choices; (3) involvement in daily service management and implementation; (4) assisting in running programs and activities; (5) assuming an active role in groups and projects; (6) working in partnership and sharing power; and (7) involvement in decision-making and control over services.
Applications
It provides examples of effective ways of promoting the ladder of user participation in centers for older people at each level and discusses principles of practice in implementation.
AskheimO. P.ChristensenK.FlugeS.GuldvikI. (2017). User participation in the Norweigian welfare context: An analysis of policy discourses. Journal of Social Policy, 46, 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000817
3.
BarnesC. (2012). The key contributions of user-led services: What does the evidence tell us? In BeresfordP.CarrS. (Eds.), Social care, service users and user involvement (pp. 173–191). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
BarnesM.CotterellP. (2012). From margin to mainstream. In BarnesM.CotterellP. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on user involvement (pp. xv–xxvi). Policy Press.
6.
BarnesM.WalkerA. (1996). Consumerism versus empowerment: A principled approach to the involvement of older service users. Policy and Politics, 24, 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557396782148417
7.
BaurV.AmbaT. (2012). ‘The taste buddies’: Participation and empowerment in a residential home for older people. Ageing and Society, 32, 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000766
8.
BeardR. L.WilliamsonJ. B. (2011). Social policy and the internal dynamics of the senior rights movement. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2010.08.008
9.
BeresfordP.CarrS.(Eds). (2012). Social care, service users and user involvement. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
10.
BeresfordP.CroftS. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch005
11.
BirchallJ.SimmonsR. (2004). User power: The participation of users in public services. National Consumer Council.
12.
BochelC.BochelH.SomervilleP.WorleyC. (2007). Marginalised or enabled voices: ‘User participation’ in policy and practice. Social Policy & Society, 7, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746407004150
13.
BohemA.StaplesL. H. (2002). The functions of the social worker in empowerment: The voices of consumers and professionals. Social Work, 47, 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.4.449
14.
BowersH.WilkinsA. (2012). Co-production in evaluation and outcomes: Lessons from working with older people in designing and undertaking research initiatives on older people’s lives, independence and wellbeing. In P. Beresford, & S. Carr (Eds.), Social care, service users and user involvement (pp. 96–119). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
15.
BrayeS. (2000). Participation and involvement in social care: An overview. In H. KemshallL. Rosemary (Eds.), User involvement and participation in social care: Research informing practice (pp. 9–28). Jessica Kingsley.
16.
BrayeS.Preston-ShootM. (1995). Empowering practice in social care. Open University Press.
CareyM. (2019). Some limits and political implications of participation within health and social care for older adults. Ageing and Society, 39, 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000193
19.
CarrS. (2007). Participation, power, conflict and change: Theorizing dynamics of service user participation in the social care system of England and Wales. Critical Social Policy, 27, 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018306075717
20.
CarterT.BeresfordP. (2000). Age and change: Models of involvement for older people. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
21.
CasadoT.SousaL.TouzaC. (2020). Older people’s perspective about their participation in health care and social care services: A systematic review. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63, 878–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1816591
22.
ChristensenK.PillingD. (2019). User participation policies in Norway and England: The case of older people and social care. Journal of Social Policy, 48, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000272
23.
DaviesK.GrayM.WebbS. A. (2014). Putting the parity into service-user participation: An integrated model of social justice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12049
FlemingJ. (2012). Service user involvement-what it is and what it could be: Lessons from the Standards we Expect project. In P. BeresfordS. Carr (Eds.), Social care, service users and user involvement (pp. 52–68). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
26.
GoerresA. (2009). The political participation of older people in Europe: The greying of our democracies. Palgrave.
27.
GossS.MillerC. (1995). From margin to mainstream: Developing user and carer centred community care. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
KamP. K. (1997). Towards empowerment and advocacy: Practice and policy in social services for older people in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work, 7(2), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650993.1997.9755764
31.
KamP. K. (2000). Political disempowerment among older people in Hong Kong. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 15, 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006791120438
KamP. K. (2021a). From the strengths perspective to an empowerment-participation-strengths model in social work practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(4), 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab049
34.
KamP. K. (2021b). Strengthening the empowerment approach in social work practice: An EPS model. Journal of Social Work, 21(30), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320911348
35.
LeungT. T. F. (2011). Client participation in managing social work practice: An unfinished quest. Social Work, 16(3), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/56.1.43
36.
LeungT. T. F. (2016). The welfare service practitioners’ perception of their power position in the user participation imperative. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 26, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2016.1201432
37.
MackayK. (2002). From consultation to participation: A study of user/survivors as co-producers of mental health services [Masters dissertation]. University of Stirling.
PardasaniM.GoldkindL. (2012). Senior centres and policy advocacy: Changing public perceptions. Educational Gerontology, 38, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2010.544588
40.
RighiV.SayagoS.RosalesA.FerreiraS. M.BlatJ. (2018). Co-designing with a community of older learners for over 10 years by moving user-driven participation from the margin to the centre. CoDesign, 14, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1424206
41.
Shaping Our Lives. (2003). Shaping our lives: From outset to outcome: What people think of the social care services they use. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
TaylorS. (2006). A new approach to empowering older people’s forums: Identifying barriers to encourage participation. Practice, 18, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503150600760157
WalkerA. (2006). Ageing and politics: An international perspective. In R. BinstockL. K. GeorgeS. J. CutlerJ. HendricksJ. H. SchulzJ. H. SchulzBin (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 329–359). Elsevier Science & Technology.
