Socioeconomic status and health are strongly related to the ability of a person to participate in society. Acting upon activation and employment possibilities is difficult for several groups. One group described as especially hard to activate is long-term welfare recipients. In the current study, the role of an activation broker was studied as a supplementary practice to regular support practices. A qualitative research design using an analysis of the administrative logbook of the activation broker and interviews with professionals (n = 8) and long-term welfare recipients (n = 10) was carried out. To structure the retrieved data, the Activation Broker Wheel was developed.
Findings
Seven core behaviours were identified and categorized in three determinants; capabilities, opportunities and motivation. Contextual factors supporting the activation broker approach were selected. The activation broker approach was found to be successful in activating long-term welfare recipients.
Applications
The behaviours, determinants and context made visible within the Activation Broker Wheel provided insight into workable elements that may help future activation brokers to optimize their support.
BeckV. (2017).
Capabilities and choices of vulnerable, long-term unemployed Individuals. Journal of Work, Employment and Society,
32(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016686028
2.
BergmanE.de FeijterJ.FrambachJ.GodefrooijM.SlootwegI.StalmeijerR.van der ZwetJ. (2012).
A guide to research paradigms relevant to medical education. Academic Medicine,
87(4), 545. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824fbc8a
BoeijeH. (2010). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek: Denken en doen.
Boom Lemma.
5.
BougetD.FrazerH.MarlierE.Pena-CasasR.VanherckeB. (2015). Integrated support for the long-term unemployed in Europe.
European Commission.
6.
BovairdT.Van RyzinG. G.LoefflerE.ParradoS. (2015).
Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy,
44(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000567
7.
BrodkinE. Z. (2015).
Street-level organization and the “real world” of workfare: Lessons from the US. Social Work & Society,
13(1), 1–16.
8.
CarlierB. E.SchuringM.LöttersF. J.BakkerB.BorgersN.BurdorA. (2013).
The influence of re-employment on quality of life and self-rated health, a longitudinal study among unemployed persons in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health,
13, 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-503
9.
CarterE.WhitworthA. (2016).
Work activation regimes and well‐being of unemployed people: Rhetoric, risk and reality of quasi‐marketization in the UK work programme. Social Policy & Administration,
51(5), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12206
Di DomenicoS. I.FournierM. A. (2014).
Socioeconomic status, income inequality, and health complaints: A basic psychological needs perspective. Social Indicators Research Journal,
119, 1679–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0572-8
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005).
Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behaviour,
26, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
HendriksA. M.JansenM. W.GubbelsJ. S.De VriesN. K.PaulussenT.KremersS. P.(2013).
Proposing a conceptual framework for integrated local public health policy, applied to childhood obesity – The behaviour change ball. Implementation Science,
8, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-46
20.
HoffmannR.KrögerH.PakpahanE. (2018).
Pathways between socioeconomic status and health: Does health selection of social causation dominate in Europe?Advances in Life Course Research,
36, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.02.002
21.
HultM.LappalainenK.SaaranenT. K.RäsänenK.VanroelenC.BurdorfA. (2018).
Health-improving interventions for obtaining employment in unemployed job seekers.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
10. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858
22.
KaranikolosM.MladovskyP. H.CyclusJ.ThomsonS.BasuS.StucklerD.MackenbachJ. P.McKeeM. (2013).
Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet,
381, 1323–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60102-6
23.
KingdonJ. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.).
Harper Collins.
24.
KoelenM. A.VaandragerL.WagemakersA. (2012).
The Healthy Alliances (HALL) framework: Prerequisites for success. Family Practice,
29, i132–i138. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmr088
LipskyM. (2010). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (2nd ed.).
Athenaeum Uitgeverij.
27.
MackenbachJ. P.StirbuI.RoskamA. J. R.SchaapM. M.MenvielleG.LeinsaluM.KunstA. E. (2008).
Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. The New England Journal of Medicine,
358, 2468–2481. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0707519
28.
McDonnellL. (2012). Qualitative data analysis using NVivo9.
University of Sussex.
29.
McKee-RyanF. M.SongZ.WanbergC. R.KinickiA. J. (2005).
Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: A meta-analytic study.Journal of Applied Psychology,
90(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.53
30.
MichieS.van StralenM.WestR. (2011).
The Behaviour Change Wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science,
6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
31.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change.
Guilford Publications.
32.
MullainathanS.ShafirE. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much.
Henry Holt & Company LLC.
33.
NoordzijG.Van HooftA. J.Van MierloH.Van DamA.BornM. (2012).
Getting unemployed job seekers back to work: The development of a process model of employment counseling behaviour.The Career Development Quarterly,
61, 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161- 0045.2013.00054.x
RogersC. R. (1956).
The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology,
21, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.44.3.240
38.
SadeghiT.FekjaerS. B. (2018).
Frontline workers’ competency in activation work.International Journal of Social Welfare,
28(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12320
SenA. (1993) Capability and well-being. In NussbaumM. ?0026; SenA. (Eds), The quality of life.
Clarendon Press.
41.
SteenbakkersM.JansenM.MaarseH.de VriesN. (2012).
Lokaal integral gezondheidsbeleid: Effecten van beleidsondersteuning op de ontwikkeling van gemeentelijke intersectorale samenwerking. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen,
90(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12508-012-0070-4
42.
ThomasL.ParkerS.SongH.GunatillakaN.RusselG.HarrisM. (2019).
Health service brokerage to improve primary care access for populations experiencing vulnerability or disadvantage: A systematic review and realist synthesis. BMC Health Services Research,
19(1), 269. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4088-z
43.
Van BerkelR.KniesE. (2015).
Performance management, caseloads and the frontline provision of social services. Social Policy & Administration,
50(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12150
44.
Van der NoordtM.IjzelenbergH.DroomersM.ProperK. (2014).
Health effects of employment: A systematic review of prospective studies. Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine,
71, 730–736. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101891
45.
Van RinsumC. E.GerardsS. M. P. L.RuttenG. M.Van de GoorI. A. M.KremersS. P. J. (2017).
Health brokers: How can they help deal with the wickedness of public health problems?BioMed Research International, 2017, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1979153
46.
VermeerA.BootN.HesdahlM.Janssen-GoffinM.LinssenE.RuttenN.HajemaK. J. (2014). Een nieuwe kijk op gezondheid in Vaals. Lokaal rapport Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning.
WilliamsP. (2010). Special agents: The nature and role of boundary spanners. Paper to the ESRC Research Seminar Series – Collaborative Futures: New Insights from Intra and Inter-Sectoral Collaborations, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
