The aim of this study is to analyse attitudes towards and the utilisation of evidence-based practice among social workers in Norway. The data were collected in 2014–2015 from social workers in four Norwegian counties. The sample consists of 2060 social workers registered as members of the Norwegian Union of Social Educators and Social Workers.
Findings
The main findings in this study indicate that social workers in child welfare are generally less critical of evidence-based practice than those within social welfare. Higher education and knowledge about evidence-based practice are seen as predictors for less critical attitudes towards the concept. The findings further suggest that social workers who use manuals and standardised procedures are less critical of evidence-based practice.
Applications
Understanding social workers’ attitudes towards evidence-based practice is important in order to facilitate the best possible practices. This study emphasises the importance of increasing knowledge of evidence-based practice in the social sector, and the need to further investigate how research methods and evidence-based practice concepts are translated into practice.
AaronsG. A. (2004).
Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research,
6, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65
2.
AaronsG. A.SawitzkyA. C. (2006).
Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice.Psychological Services,
3, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.61
3.
AddisM. E.WadeW. A.HatgisC. (2006).
Barriers to dissemination of evidence-based practices: Addressing practitioners’ concerns about manual-based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice,
6, 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.6.4.430
4.
AngelB. Ø. (2003).
Evidensbaserte programmer – Kunnskapsformer og menneskesyn I sosialt arbeid [Evidence-based programmes – Forms of knowledge and ideas of human beings in social work]. Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid,
23, 66–72. https://bit.ly/3dnizbb
5.
AvbyG.NilsenP.Abrandt DahlgrenM. (2013).
Ways of understanding evidence-based practice in social work: A qualitative study. British Journal of Social Work,
44, 1366–1383. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs198
6.
BergmarkA.LundströmT. (2011).
Guided or independent? Social workers, central bureaucracy and evidence-based practice. European Journal of Social Work,
14, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691451003744325
7.
BryderupI. M. (2008). Evidence based and knowledge based social work: Research methods and approaches in social work research (pp. 9–33).
Aarhus University Press.
DriskoJ. W.GradyM. D. (2012). Evidence-based practice in clinical social work (pp. 19–20).
Springer Science & Business Media.
10.
DriskoJ. W.GradyM. D. (2015).
Evidence-based practice in social work: A contemporary perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal,
43, 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0548-z
11.
EkelandT.BergemR.MyklebustV. (2018).
Evidence-based practice in social work: Perceptions and attitudes among Norwegian social workers. European Journal of Social Work,
22, 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.144113
12.
EvettsJ. (2006).
Introduction: Trust and professionalism: Challenges and occupational changes. Current Sociology,
54, 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106065083
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (p. 686).
Sage.
15.
GolightleyM.HollowayM. (2017).
Social work under neo-liberalism: Fellow sufferer or wounded healer?The British Journal of Social Work,
47, 965–972. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx068
16.
GradyM. D.WikeT.PutzuC.FieldS.HillJ.BledsoeS. E.BellamyJ.MasseyM. (2017).
Recent social work practitioners’ understanding and use of evidence-based practice and empirically supported treatments. Journal of Social Work Education,
54, 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1299063
17.
GrayM.JoyE.PlathD.WebbS. A. (2013).
Opinions about evidence: A study of social workers’ attitudes towards evidence-based practice. Journal of Social Work,
14, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017313475555
18.
HealyK.MeagherG. (2004).
The reprofessionalization of social work: Collaborative approaches for achieving professional recognition. British Journal of Social Work,
34, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch024
19.
JamesS.LampeL.BehnkenS.SchulzD. (2018).
Evidence-based practice and knowledge utilisation – A study of attitudes and practices among social workers in Germany. European Journal of Social Work,
22, 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1469475
20.
JessenJ. T.TufteP. A. (2014).
Discretionary decision-making in a changing context of activation policies and welfare reforms. Journal of Social Policy,
43, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279413000998
21.
JohanssonK.DenvallV.VedungE. (2015).
After the NPM wave: Evidence-based practice and the vanishing client. Offentlig Förvaltning. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration,
19(2), 69–88. https://bit.ly/315xLHx
22.
JolliffeI. T.CadimaJ. (2016).
Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,
374(2065), 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
23.
KnightC. (2015).
Social work students’ use of the peer-reviewed literature and engagement in evidence-based practice. Journal of Social Work Education,
51, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1012924
24.
McKeeE. C. (2014). Evidence-based practice attitudes, knowledge and perceptions of barriers among juvenile justice service professionals [Doctoral thesis]. University of South Florida. https://bit.ly/2V777dz
25.
NatlandS.Malmberg-HeimonenI. (2016).
Familieråd – Frigjørende sosialt arbeid innenfor en manualbasert modell? [Family-group conferences – A manual-based model for empowering social work?] Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning,
1, 44–61. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2016-01-03
26.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory.
McGraw-Hill Companies.
27.
ParrishD. E.RubinA. (2010).
An effective model for continuing education training in evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice,
21, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509359187
28.
PatrasJ.KlestS. (2015).
Group size and therapists’ workplace ratings: Three is the magic number. Journal of Social Work,
16, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017315581564
29.
RussellD. J.RivardL. M.WalterS. D.RosenbaumP. L.RoxboroughL.CameronD.DarrahJ.BartlettD. J.HannaS. E.AveryL. M. (2010).
Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: A before-after intervention study.Implementation Science,
5, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-92
30.
SackettD. L.StrausS. E.RichardsonW. S.RosenbergW.HaynesR. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.).
Churchill-Livingstone.
31.
Scurlock-EvansL.UptonD. (2015).
The role and nature of evidence: A systematic review of social workers’ evidence-based practice orientation, attitudes, and implementation.Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work,
12, 369–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2013.853014
SmithB. D. (2013).
Substance use treatment counselors’ attitudes toward evidence-based practice: The importance of organizational context.Substance Use & Misuse,
48, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2013.765480
34.
Statistics Norway. (2019). Helse- og sosialpersonell [Health professionals]. https://bit.ly/2CviFki
35.
TellingsA. (2017).
Evidence-based practice in the social sciences? A scale of causality, interventions, and possibilities for scientific proof.Theory & Psychology,
27, 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317726876
36.
ThyerB. A. (2006). What is evidence-based practice? In RobertsA. B.YeagerK. (Eds.), Foundations of evidence-based social work practice (pp. 35–46).
Oxford University Press.
Van der ZwetR. J.Beneken genaamd KolmerD. M.SchalkR.Van RegenmortelT. (2019).
Views and attitudes towards evidence-based practice in a Dutch social work organization. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work,
16, 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2019.1584071
39.
WelbourneP. (2011).
Twenty-first century social work: The influence of political context on public service provision in social work education and service delivery. European Journal of Social Work,
14, 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691451003706670
40.
WikeT. L.BledsoeS. E.ManuelJ. I.DespardM.JohnsonL. V.BellamyJ. L.Killian-FarrellC. (2014).
Evidence-based practice in social work: Challenges and opportunities for clinicians and organizations. Clinical Social Work Journal,
42, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0492-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
