Interest in transnationality and borders has expanded considerably within several academic disciplines over the last decades. This paper explores the way this transnational perspective has been developed within social work. It then identifies a number of gaps in current transnational social work research and proposes four avenues for additional inquiry that allow for an unbounding of how social work is theorised and the development of a perspective that recognises social work’s role beyond a bounded national state.
Findings
Borders and cross-border processes and structures pose essential challenges to social work research and practice. State borders may be opening to certain cyber, social and economic functions, but are at the same time (re-)closing to other security and political functions. Moreover, more metaphorical and symbolic boundaries are also strengthening. A transnational turn in the educational, theoretical and practical field of social work requires a move away from the conventional local and sedentary conceptualisation of society and social life that is still omnipresent today, in order to develop a social work that recognises and explores, as well as challenges and crosses borders and boundaries.
Applications
Despite the increase of transnational lifestyles, social problems and social work practices, the body of knowledge in this domain is as yet rather limited and fragmented. The applications of this article concern a theoretical contribution to this body of knowledge, which can also be used in curricula for social work education. Moreover, it contributes to a move away from the ‘methodological nationalism’ at work in social work.
AdeyP. (2004).
Secured and sorted mobilities: Examples from the airport. Surveillance & Society,
1(4), 500–519. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i4.3333
2.
AhmadiN. (2003).
Globalization of consciousness and new challenges for international social work. International Journal of Social Welfare,
12(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00005
3.
AlbaR. (2005).
Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
28(2), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280003
4.
AlvarezR. R. (1995).
The Mexican-US border: The making of an anthropology of borderlands. Annual Review of Anthropology,
24, 447–470. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2155945
5.
AnS.ChambonA.KöngeterS. (2016).
Transnational histories of social work and social welfare – An introduction. Transnational Social Review,
6(3), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1222788
6.
AndersonB. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism.
Verso.
7.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza.
Aunt Lute.
8.
AppaduraiA. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization.
University of Minnesota Press.
9.
BacheletA.RichardY. (2018).
La construction de la frontière de facto abkhazo-géorgienne, entre enjeux sécuritaires, politiques et identitaires.L’espace Politique,
36(3). https://doi.org/10.4000/espacepolitique.5691
10.
BarthF. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference.
Little, Brown and Company.
11.
BartleyA.BeddoeL. (2018). Transnational social work: Opportunities and challenges of a global profession.
Policy Press.
12.
BigoD. (2002).
Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political,
27(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F03043754020270S105
13.
BoccagniP. (2015).
Burden, blessing or both? On the mixed role of transnational ties in migrant informal social support. International Sociology,
30(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580915570508
14.
BoccagniP.RighardE.BolzmanC. (2015).
Mapping transnationalism: Transnational social work with migrants. Transnational Social Review,
5(3), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2015.1101243
BrettellC. B. (2008). Constructing borders/crossing boundaries: Race, ethnicity, and immigration.
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
17.
ChambonA.JohnstoneM.KöngeterS. (2015).
The circulation of knowledge and practices across national borders in the early twentieth century: A focus on social reform organisations. European Journal of Social Work,
18(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2014.953041
18.
ChambonA.SchröerW.SchweppeC. (2012). Transnational social support.
Routledge.
19.
ChoateP. W. (2019).
The call to decolonise: Social work’s challenge for working with indigenous peoples. The British Journal of Social Work,
49(4), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz011
20.
ClarkeH. D.GoodwinM.WhiteleyP. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain voted to leave the European Union.
Cambridge University Press.
21.
CoxD.PawarM. S. (2006). International social work: Issues, strategies, and programs.
Sage.
22.
DeaconB. (2007). Global social policy and governance.
Sage.
23.
EcklundE. H. (2005).
‘Us’ and ‘them’: The role of religion in mediating and challenging the ‘model minority’ and other civic boundaries. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
28(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280049
24.
EdensorT.JayneM. (2011). Introduction. In EdensorT.JayneM. (Eds.), Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color (pp. 1–27).
Routledge.
25.
EliasN.ScotsonJ. L. (1965). The established and the outsiders.
Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.
26.
EnfaltungenL. (2001). Taxonomy and unfolding. In BunschotenR.HoshinoT.BinetH. (Eds.), Urban flotsam: Stirring the city (pp. 265–345).
010 Publishers.
FurmanR.CaseyE. (2010). Transnational men. In NegiN.FurmanR. (Eds.), Transnational social work practice (pp. 143–154).
Columbia University Press.
29.
FurmanR.NegiN. J. (2007).
Social work practice with transnational Latino populations. International Social Work,
50(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872807072500
30.
FurmanR.NegiN. J.SalvadorR. B. (2010). An introduction to transnational social work. In Transnational social work practice (pp. 3–19).
Columbia University Press.
GellnerE. (1983). Nations and nationalism.
Cornell University Press.
33.
GeorgiouM.ZaborowskiR. (2017). Media coverage of the ‘refugee crisis’: A cross-European perspective (Council of Europe report DG1(2017)03).
34.
Glick SchillerN.BaschL.Szanton-BlancC. (1992). Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity, and nationalism reconsidered.
New York Academy of Sciences.
35.
GoldinI.CameronG.BalarajanM. (2012). Exceptional people: How migration shaped our world and will define our future.
Princeton University Press.
36.
GreenG.DavisonC.BradbyH.KrauseK.Morente MjiasF.AlexG. (2014).
Pathways to care: How superdiversity shapes the need for navigational assistance.Sociology of Health & Illness,
36(8), 1205–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12161
HareI. (2004).
Defining social work for the 21st century: The International Federation of Social Workers’ revised definition of social work. International Social Work,
47(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872804043973
41.
HaugE. (2005).
Critical reflections on the emerging discourse of international social work. International Social Work,
48(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872805050204
HealyL. M. (2008). International social work: Professional action in an interdependent world.
Oxford University Press.
44.
HealyL. M. (2012). Defining international social work. In HealyL. M.LinkR. J. (Eds.), Handbook of international social work: Human rights, development, and the global profession (pp. 9–15).
Oxford University Press.
45.
HorsmanM.MarshallA. (1994). After the nation-state: Citizens, tribalism and the new world disorder.
HarperCollins.
46.
HugmanR. (2012). Culture, values and ethics in social work: Embracing diversity.
Routledge.
47.
HugmanR.Moosa-MithaM.MoyoO. (2010).
Towards a borderless social work: Reconsidering notions of international social work. International Social Work,
53(5), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810371203
48.
HunterC. A.LepleyS.NickelsS. (2010). New practice frontiers: Current and future social work with transmigrants. In NegiN. J.FurmanR. (Eds.), Transnational social work practice (pp. 222–241).
Columbia University Press.
49.
HyndmanJ.MountzA. (2007). Refuge or refusal: The geography of exclusion. In GregoryD.PredA. R. (Eds.), Violent geographies: Fear, terror, and political violence (pp. 77–92).
Routledge.
International Federation of Social Workers. (2000, July). Definition of social work. Adopted by the IFSW General Meeting in Montréal, Canada.
53.
JanzenJ. M. (2002). The social fabric of health: An introduction to medical anthropology.
McGraw Hill.
54.
KarlsenS.NazrooJ. Y. (2015).
Ethnic and religious differences in the attitudes of people towards being ‘British’. The Sociological Review,
63, 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-954X.12313
55.
KendallK. A. (2000). Social work education: Its origins in Europe.
Council on Social Work Education.
56.
KettunenP.PetersenK. (2011). Beyond welfare state models: Transnational historical perspectives on social policy.
Edward Elgar.
57.
KolossovV.ScottJ. (2013).
Selected conceptual issues in border studies.Belgeo: Revue Belge de Géographie,
1. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.10532
58.
KrauseK. (2008).
Transnational therapy networks among Ghanaians in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,
34(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830701823863
59.
LacyK. R. (2007). Blue-chip black: Race, class, and status in the new black middle class.
University of California Press.
60.
LaineJ. (2015). A historical view on the study of borders. In SevastianovS.LaineJ.KireevA. (Eds.), Introduction to border studies (pp. 14–32).
Dalnauka.
LamontM.PendergrassS.PachuckiM. A. (2015). Symbolic boundaries. In WrightJ. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 850–855).
Elsevier.
63.
LavaletteM.IoakimidisV. (2009). International social work or social work internationalism? Radical social work in global perspective. In LavaletteM. (Ed.), Radical social work today (pp. 135–152).
Policy Press.
64.
LyonsK. (1999). International social work: Themes and perspectives.
Ashgate.
65.
LyonsK. (2006).
Globalization and social work: International and local implications. The British Journal of Social Work,
36(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl007
66.
MalkkiL. (1992).
National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology,
7(1), 24–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/656519
67.
MaskensM. (2008).
Migration et pentecôtisme à Bruxelles: Expériences croisées.Archives de Sciences Sociales Des Religions,
143, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.4000/assr.16423
68.
MauS. (2010). Social transnationalism: Lifeworlds beyond the nation-state.
Routledge.
69.
McInnesA. (2013).
Why should they listen to me? Developing social work education and social work in Tajikistan. International Social Work,
56(5), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812440716
70.
McNuttJ. G. (2010). Using internet technology for transnational social work practice and education. In NegiN. J.FurmanR. (Eds.), Transnational social work practice (pp. 184–198).
Columbia University Press.
71.
MeeusB.van HeurB.ArnautK. (2019). Migration and the infrastructural politics of urban arrival. In MeeusB.ArnautK.van HeurB. (Eds.), Arrival infrastructures: Migration and urban social mobilities (pp. 1–32).
Palgrave Macmillan.
Moosa-MithaM.Ross-SheriffF. (2010).
Transnational social work and lessons learned from transnational feminism. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work,
25(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886109910364366
74.
NegiN. J.FurmanR. (2010). Transnational social work practice.
Columbia University Press.
75.
NewmanD. (2006).
The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography,
30(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1191%2F0309132506ph599xx
76.
Nobe-GhelaniC. (2017).
Border narratives in Canadian social work: Neoliberal nationalism in the discursive construction of “citizen/Self” and “non-citizen/Other”. Transnational Social Review,
7(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2017.1314656
77.
O’BrienR. (1992). Global financial integration: The end of geography.
Council on Foreign Relations Press.
78.
OhmaeK. (1990). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy.
HarperCollins.
PadillaB. (2011).
Engagement policies and practices: Expanding the citizenship of the Brazilian diaspora. International Migration,
49(3), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00694.x
81.
PayneM. (2005). The origins of social work.
Palgrave Macmillan.
82.
PayneM.AskelandG. A. (2016). Globalization and international social work: Postmodern change and challenge.
Routledge.
83.
PhillimoreJ.BradbyH.KnechtM.PadillaB.PembertonS. (2019).
Bricolage as conceptual tool for understanding access to healthcare in superdiverse populations. Social Theory & Health,
17(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-0075-4
PopescuG. (2011). Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders.
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
86.
PortesA. (2003).
Theoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migration Review,
37(3), 874–892. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30037760
87.
PortesA.GuarnizoL. E.LandoltP. (1999).
The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies,
22(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329468
88.
PotockyM. (2010). Social work practice with victims of transnational human trafficking. In NegiN. J.FurmanR. (Eds.), Transnational social work practice (pp. 119–131).
Colombia University Press.
89.
PrattM. L. (1991).
Arts of the contact zone.Profession,
91, 33–40.
90.
PriesL. (2005).
Configurations of geographic and societal spaces: A sociological proposal between ‘methodological nationalism’ and the ‘spaces of flows’. Global Networks,
5(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00113.x
91.
RaelR. (2017). Borderwall as architecture: A manifesto for the U.S.-Mexico boundary.
University of California Press.
92.
RamanathanC. S.LinkR. J. (1999). All our futures: Principles and resources for social work practice in a global era.
Brooks/Cole Pub.
93.
RighardE. (2018).
Conceptualizing social work through the lens of transnationalism: Challenges and ways ahead. Nordic Journal of Migration Research,
8(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2018-0028
94.
RighardE.BoccagniP. (2015).
Mapping the theoretical foundations of the social work – Migration nexus. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies,
13(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2015.1035473
95.
RobinsonJ. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development.
Routledge.
SalazarN. B.SmartA. (2011).
Introduction: Anthropological takes on (im)mobility.Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power,
18(6), i–ix. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2012.683674
98.
SandersD. S.PedersenP. (Eds.). (1984). Education for international social welfare.
University of Hawaii and Council on Social Work Education.
99.
SapersteinA.PennerA. M. (2012).
Racial fluidity and inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology,
118(3), 676–727. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667722
100.
SchrootenM. (2012).
(Trans)Forming boundaries in a contact zone: The experience of Brazilian migrants in Brussels.Revista de Ciencias Sociales,
29, 89–104. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=70824863004
101.
SchrootenM.GeldofD.WithaeckxS. (2016).
Transmigration and urban social work: Towards a research agenda. European Journal of Social Work,
19(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2014.1001725
102.
SchrootenM.MeeusB. (2020).
The possible role and position of social work as part of the arrival infrastructure. European Journal of Social Work,
23(3), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1688257
103.
SchrootenM.SalazarN. B.DiasG. (2016).
Living in mobility: Trajectories of Brazilians in Belgium and the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,
42(7), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1089160
104.
SchrootenM.ThysR.DebruyneP. (Eds.). (2019). Sociaal schaduwwerk. Over informele spelers in het welzijnslandschap.
Politeia.
105.
SchrootenM.ThysR.NolfE. (2017). Zelforganisaties in het Brusselse lokaal sociaal beleid. In RaeymaeckersP.NoëlC.BoostD.VermeirenC.CoeneJ.Van DamS. (Eds.), Tijd voor sociaal beleid. Armoedebestrijding op lokaal niveau (pp. 119–136).
Acco.
106.
SchrootenM.WithaeckxS.GeldofD.LaventM. (2016). Transmigration: Social work in a world of superdiversity.
Acco.
SibleyD. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West.
Routledge.
109.
SteinH. (1957). An international perspective in the social work curriculum.
Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education,
Los Angeles.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people.
Zed Books.
112.
VertovecS. (2009). Transnationalism.
Routledge.
113.
WallimannI. (2014). Transnational social work: A new paradigm with perspectives. In NobleC.StraussH.LittlechildB. (Eds.), Global social work: Crossing borders, blurring boundaries (pp. 15–26).
Sydney University Press.
WimmerA.Glick SchillerN. (2003).
Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review,
37(3), 576–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00151.x
116.
WithaeckxS.SchrootenM.GeldofD. (2017).
Thinking and acting globally and locally: Developing transnational social work practices in Belgium. Transnational Social Review,
7(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2017.1317198
117.
YipK.-S. (2004).
A Chinese cultural critique of the global qualifying standards for social work education. Social Work Education,
23(5), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261547042000252316
118.
ZibouhF. (2019). Lokale, translokale en transnationale solidariteitspraktijken in het hart van Brussel. In SchrootenM.ThysR.DebruyneP. (Eds.), Sociaal schaduwwerk. Over informele spelers in het welzijnslandschap (pp. 113–119).
Politeia.
