Professional identity construction among social work agencies

Abstract

Summary

Social work agencies in China are encountering issues like lack of social perception, social recognition, and public participation and insufficient competitiveness of their professional services. To discuss solutions to these problems, this study adopts a different perspective than existing studies, focusing on professional identity construction among social work agencies. It provides an effective theoretical framework that includes value, contextual, and symbolic identity construction embedded in the Chinese administrative institution.

Findings

Positive and negative factors influencing the construction of professional cultural, status, and brand identity among social work agencies and approaches are identified. In the context of government purchasing of public services, the professional cultural identity of Chinese social work agencies can integrate with traditional Chinese culture and Western social work values to enhance the cultural consciousness and introspection of agencies. Professional status identity helps agencies access government resources and establish professional authority. Professional brand identity can increase the identification of the agencies under the political features of party construction. The combination of the three can promote the development of Chinese social work.

Applications

Professional identity construction offers a new perspective to improve the credibility, competitiveness, and public recognition of social work agencies in China to attract social participation and perform the function of social governance more effectively. Social organizations can improve their professional status and brand identities by refining their professional cultural and promotional systems, fostering the development of institutional credibility, and cultivating professional service projects.

Keywords

Social work identity construction professional cultural identity professional status identity professional brand identity social work agencies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

(2000). Identity is destiny: Leadership and the roots of value creation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. https://julac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1daqlk7/HKU_IZ51525876780003414

Albert

Whetten

(1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 263–295.

Chen

X. C.

(2003). The marketing strategy of NGOs. Hunan People’s Press.

Civil Affairs Bureau of Shenzhen. (2017). Shenzhen non-governmental organization assessment guide. http://www.szmz.sz.gov.cn/cn/xxgk_mz/mtgz/201 708/t20170816_8142444.htm

Downey

(1986). The relationship between corporate culture and corporate identity. Public Relations Quarterly, 31(4), 7–12. https://julac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/2g51j6/TN_proquest222503122

Gao

Y. X.

(2014). Analysis on the multiple characteristics and generating mechanism of the development of non-governmental social work agencies: From the perspective of social governance innovation. Chinese Social Work, 262, 66–74. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

Gibelman

(1999). The search for identity: Defining social work – Past, present, future. Social Work, 44, 298–310. https://julac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/2g51j6/TN_oxford10.1093/sw/44.4.298

Glaser

B. G.

(1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.

Hughes

(1960). The profession in society. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Sciences, 26, 54–61.

10.

International Federation of Social Workers. (2018). Global social work statement of ethical principles. https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles/

11.

Liamputtong

Ezzy

(2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

12.

Liu

J. T.

(2014). Social work practice with Chinese characteristics: A list of basic problems and a general model of social work practice. Social Welfare, 1, 2–20. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

13.

S. Z.

Zheng

(2013). A brief discussion on the development of private social work service agencies in China. Chinese Social Work, 3, 16–23. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

14.

Peng

S. M.

(2010). The path of cultivation and problem of development on social work agencies in Shanghai. Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 54–61, 188, 189. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

15.

Shardlow

(1989). The values of change in social work. Routledge.

16.

Shi

B. N.

(2006). Institutional factors and professional identity – On the strategies of social work professionalization. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 4, 6–11. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

17.

Stewart

(1991). Corporate identity: A strategic marketing issue. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19, 32–39.

18.

Tong

(2007). Meeting of east and west: A research on specialization and contextualization of social work services. Journal of Xiamen University (Arts & Social Sciences), 4, 121–128. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

19.

Wang

S. B.

(2011). Embedded development of social work in China. Social Science Front, 2, 206–222. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

20.

Wang

S. B.

Tsang

Y. K.

(2009). The development of social work in China in the context of building a harmonious society. Social Sciences in China, 5, 128–140. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

21.

Wen

(2009). Ten challenges facing the development of social work in contemporary China. Social Science, 5, 66–70. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

22.

D. W.

(2017). Key issues in the legislation of social work in china. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance, 5, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.14063/j.cnki.1008-9314.2017.05.028

23.

L. Y.

(2004). Positioning and shaping of professional image – Strategic thinking on professional development of social work in China. Journal of China Youth University for Political Science (Sociology and Social Work Practice), 6, 112–118. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

24.

X. G.

(2019). From embedding system to embedding life: The paradigm shift and choice of the era for social work in China. Social Work and Management, 19(3), 7–15. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

25.

Yang

Y. Y.

(2017). The change of the relationship between social work agency and other bodies of social governance in the government purchase mechanism: take Shenzhen as an example. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance, 5, 34–39, 144, 145. https://doi.org/10.14063/j.cnki.1008-9314.2017.05.029

26.

Yang

S. Y.

Wang

C. Z.

(2011). Traditional culture and local social work construction: Analysis of localization of social work under the perspective of modernization. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences), 6, 74–77. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

27.

S. G.

(2013). Problems and development trends of private social work agencies: Take Shenzhen as an example. Journal of Social Work, 5, 21–25, 151. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).

28.

Zhao

(2015). The connotation, essence and development path on the professionalization of social work. Journal of Social Science, 8, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2015.08.008

29.

Zhou

D. X.

Q.Y.

(2015). Professionalization: The only way for social work to be “recognized.” Journal of China Institute of Industrial Relations, 29, 92–96. CNKI Knowledge Resources (in Chinese).