The extra strains experienced by families who care for a relative with intellectual disabilities are well documented. The provision of overnight (respite) breaks or supports in the home are common ways of supporting family carers. Often demand exceeds supply. Using data from a national register in Ireland, child and adults who received overnight breaks and in-home support were identified along with the characteristics that distinguished them from families that did not have these services. Moreover, changes in provision over a 10-year period were monitored and variations in provision across the country were ascertained.
Findings
Overnight breaks were the dominant form of family support in Ireland. However, they were available to fewer persons in 2017 compared to 2007, whereas the provision of home supports remained constant. Persons with severe and profound disabilities were those most likely to receive home supports or overnight breaks as were persons aged 30 years and over. There were persistent marked differences across the country in the provision of home supports, although the variation in the usage of overnight breaks had contracted somewhat in 2017.
Applications
Additional investment is needed to provide supports for families, given the increasing numbers of persons with intellectual disabilities living at home. A wider range of support options would provide greater choice and arguably improve the cost-effectiveness of current resources. Frontline professionals, such as social workers, need to be to the fore in persuading service commissioners of these needs based on empirical data as well as their personal experiences.
BarrosoN. E.MendezL.GrazianoP. A.BagnerD. M. (2018).
Parenting stress through the lens of different clinical groups: A systematic review & meta-analysis.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,
46, 449–461. doi:10.1007/s10802-017-0313-6
2.
BrennanD.MurphyR.McCallionP.McCarronM. (2018).
“What’s going to happen when we're gone?” Family caregiving capacity for older people with an intellectual disability in Ireland.Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
31, 226–235. doi:10.1111/jar.12379
3.
BurkeE.McCallionP.McCarronM. (2015). Advancing years, different challenges: Wave 2 IDS-TILDA.
Dublin:
Trinity College.
4.
ChadwickO.BeechamJ.PirothN.BernardS.TaylorE. (2002).
Respite care for children with severe intellectual disability and their families: Who needs it? Who receives it?Child and Adolescent Mental Health,
7, 66–72. doi:10.1111/1475-3588.00013
5.
ChanJ.MerrimanB.ParmenterT.StancliffeR. (2012).
Rethinking respite policy for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,
9, 120–126. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2012.00332.x
6.
CramerH.CarlinJ. (2007).
Family-based short breaks (respite) for disabled children: Results from the fourth national survey.British Journal of Social Work,
38, 1060–1075. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl393
7.
DoddP.CraigS.KellyF.GuerinS. (2010).
An audit of the Irish national intellectual disability database.Research in Developmental Disabilities,
31, 446–451. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.011
8.
Emerson, E., & Glover, G. (2012).
The “transition cliff” in the administrative prevalence of learning disabilities in England. Tizard Learning Disability Review,
17,139–143.
9.
Garcia IriarteE.O’BrienP.McConkeyR.WolfeM.O’DohertyS. (2014).
Identifying the key concerns of Irish persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
27, 564–575. doi:10.1111/jar.12099
10.
GlasbyJ. (2017). Understanding health and social care.
Bristol:
Policy Press.
11.
HanrahanD. (2010). A host of opportunities: Second NHSN survey of family based short break schemes for children and adults with intellectual and other disabilities in the Republic of Ireland. NHSN: Mullingar and Drogheda.
12.
HarringtonC.KangT. (2016).
Disparities in service use and expenditures in California for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in California in 2005 and 2013. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,
54, 1–18. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-54.1.1
13.
HattonC. (2017a).
Living arrangements of adults with learning disabilities across the UK.Tizard Learning Disability Review,
22, 43–50. doi:10.1108/TLDR-11-2016-0040
14.
HattonC. (2017b).
Day services and home care for adults with learning disabilities across the UK.Tizard Learning Disability Review,
22, 109–115. doi:10.1108/TLDR-01-2017-0004
15.
Health Services Executive (HSE). (2014). Community healthcare organisations – Report and recommendations of the integrated service area review group.
Dublin:
Author.
16.
HellerT.KramerJ. (2009).
Involvement of adult siblings of persons with developmental disabilities in future planning.Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,
47, 208–219. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-47.3.208
17.
HewittA.AgostaJ.HellerT.WilliamsA. C.ReinkeJ. (2013).
Families of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Policy, funding, services, and experiences.Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,
51, 349–359. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.349
18.
HolmesL.McDermidS.SempilJ. (2010). The costs of short of break provision. London: Centre for Child and Family Research,
Loughborough University.
19.
HouriganS.FanaganS.KellyC. (2018). Annual report of the National Intellectual Disability Database Committee 2017: Main findings.
Dublin.
Health Research Board.
20.
KellyC.McConkeyR.CraigS. (2019). Family carers of people with intellectual disabilities in Ireland: Changes over ten years. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1744629519866313.
21.
LarkinM.MitchellW. (2016).
Carers, choice and personalisation: What do we know?Social Policy and Society,
15, 189–205. doi:10.1017/S1474746415000299
22.
McConkeyR.KellyF.CraigS. (2011).
Access to respite breaks for families who have a relative with intellectual disabilities: a national survey.Journal of Advanced Nursing,
67, 1349–1357. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05586.x
23.
McConkeyR.SowneyM.MilliganV.BarrO. (2005).
Views of people with intellectual disabilities of their present and future living arrangements.Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,
1, 115–125. doi:10.1111/j.1533-1598.2006.00103.x-i1
24.
MerrimanB.CanavanJ. (2007). Towards best practice in the provision of respite services for people with intellectual disabilities and autism.
Galway:
Child and Family Research Centre, U.C.G.
25.
OliverA.MossialosE. (2004).
Equity of access to health care: Outlining the foundations for action.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,
58, 655–658. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.017731
26.
ParrottR.TilleyN.WolstenholmeJ. (2008).
Changes in demography and demand for services from people with complex needs and profound and multiple learning disabilities.Tizard Learning Disability Review,
13(3), 26–34. doi:10.1108/13595474200800026
27.
PattonK. A.WareR.McPhersonL.EmersonE.LennoxN. (2018).
Parent‐related stress of male and female carers of adolescents with intellectual disabilities and carers of children within the general population: A cross‐sectional comparison.Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
31, 51–61. doi:10.1111/jar.12292
28.
PowerA. (2009).
‘It’s the system working for the system’: Carers’ experiences of learning disability services in Ireland.Health & Social Care in the Community,
17, 92–98. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00807.x
29.
RobertsonJ.HattonC.WellsE.CollinsM.LangerS.WelchV.EmersonE. (2011).
The impacts of short break provision on families with a disabled child: An international literature review.Health & Social Care in the Community,
19, 337–371. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00977.x
30.
RomeoR.MolosankweI. (2010).
Economic evidence in intellectual disabilities: A review.Current Opinion in Psychiatry,
23, 427–431. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833ad946
31.
RothmanJ. (2018). Social work practice across disability.
New York:
Routledge.
32.
RyanA.TaggartL.Truesdale-KennedyM.SlevinE. (2014).
Issues in caregiving for older people with intellectual disabilities and their ageing family carers: A review and commentary.International Journal of Older People Nursing,
9, 217–226. doi:10.1111/opn.12021
33.
SeddonD.RobinsonC. (2015).
Carer assessment: Continuing tensions and dilemmas for social care practice.Health & Social Care in the Community,
23, 14–22. doi:10.1111/hsc.12115
34.
SouthbyK. (2017).
Barriers to non-residential respite care for adults with moderate to complex needs: A UK perspective.Journal of Intellectual Disabilities,
21, 366–386. doi:10.1177/1744629516658577
35.
StrunkJ. A. (2010).
Respite care for families of special needs children: A systematic review.Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,
22, 615–630. doi:10.1007/s10882-010-9190-4
36.
WalkerR.HutchinsonC. (2018).
Planning for the future among older parents’ of adult offspring with intellectual disability living at home and in the community: A systematic review of qualitative studies.Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability,
43, 453–462. doi:10.3109/13668250.2017.1310823
37.
WelchV.CollinsM.HattonC.EmersonE.RobertsonJ.WellsE.LangerS. (2014).
Short break and respite services for disabled children in England: Comparing children’s and parents’ perspectives of their impact on children.Children & Society,
28, 478–494. doi:10.1111/chso.12001
38.
World Health Organisation. (2010). ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders.
Geneva: WHO.
