A trauma-informed, thematic analysis that identified stress-related themes evident in 39 personal abortion narratives from the Tennessee Stories Project in the United States is presented in this paper. Using the Braun and Clarke model of thematic analysis, guided by the trauma-informed social work framework, researchers examined these narratives to identify stress related themes.
Findings
An overall theme of stress and traumatic stress was found to be present throughout the abortion narratives. These themes were categorized into subthemes, including: (a) existing life stressors preceding the abortion experience, (b) stressors while trying to access abortion services, (c) stressors while obtaining abortion services, and (d) stressors arising after the procedure.
Applications
These results suggest that stress and traumatic stress were reflected in these abortion narratives throughout the abortion seeking experience. This finding supports the need for social work practice responses that are designed to address and eliminate stress during the process of seeking and obtaining an abortion in the United States. A trauma-informed framework is recommended for guiding social work education about abortion, social worker interactions with clients who are seeking abortions, and the development of abortion policy in the United States in order to better align the abortion seeking experience with the principles of trauma-informed care.
AlbaladejoA. (2016/2017).
A “witch hunt” against poor women: Across the Americas abortion laws are harming health and security.World Policy Journal,
33(4), 26–34. doi:10.1215/07402775–3812906
2.
AllenM. (2015).
Narrative diversity and sympathetic abortion: What online storytelling reveals about the prescribed norms of the mainstream movements.Symbolic Interaction,
38(1), 42–63. doi:10.1002/symb.135
3.
AndersonC. (2010).
Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,
74(8), 1–7. doi:10.5688/aj7408141
BealsK. P.PeplauL. A.GableS. L. (2009).
Stigma management and well-being: The role of perceived social support, emotional processing and suppression.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,
35(7), 867–879. doi:10.1177/0146167209334783
7.
BegunS.BirdM.Ramseyer WinterV.Massey CombsK.McKayK. (2016).
Correlates of social work students’ abortion knowledge and attitudes: Implications for education and research.Social Work in Public Health,
31(4), 276–287. doi:10.1080/19371918.2015.1137510
8.
BegunS.KattariS. K.McKayK.Ramseyer WinterV.O’NeillE. (2017).
Exploring US social work students’ sexual attitudes and abortion viewpoints.The Journal of Sex Research,
54(6), 752–763. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1186586
9.
BiggsM. A.RowlandB.McCullochC. E.FosterD. G. (2016).
Does abortion increase women’s risk for post-traumatic stress? Findings from a prospective longitudinal cohort study.BMJ Open,
6(2), e009698. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015–009698.
10.
BiggsM. A.UpadhyayU. D.McCullochC. E.FosterD. G. (2017).
Women’s mental health and well-being 5 years after receiving or being denied an abortion: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study.JAMA Psychiatry,
74(2), 169–178. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478.
11.
BorlandE. (2014).
Storytelling, identity, and strategy: Perceiving shifting obstacles in the fight for abortion rights in Argentina.Sociological Perspectives,
57(4), 488–505. doi:10.1177/0731121414536884
12.
BowenE. A.MurshidN. S. (2016).
Trauma-informed social policy: A conceptual framework for policy analysis and advocacy.American Journal of Public Health,
102(2), 223–229. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302970
13.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006).
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology,
3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
14.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. In Cooper’sH. (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology Vol. II (pp. 57–71).
Washington, DC:
APA Press.
15.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2014).
What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?International Journal on Qualitative Studies of Health and Wellbeing,
9(1). doi:10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
BryantA. G.LeviE. E. (2012).
Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.Contraception,
86(6), 752–756. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.001
18.
ByrantA. G.NarasimhanS.Bryant-ComstockK.LeviE. E. (2014).
Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation, and disinformation.Contraception,
90(6), 601–605. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003
19.
ChaeS.DesaiS.CrowellM.SedghG. (2017).
Reasons why women have induced abortions: A synthesis of findings from 14 countries.Contraception,
96(4), 233–241. doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.06.014
20.
CharlesV. E.PolisC. B.SridharaS. K.BlumR. W. (2008).
Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: A systematic review of the evidence.Contraception,
78(6), 436–450. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.005
21.
ChiwesheM.MavusoJ.MacleodC. (2017).
Reproductive justice in context: South African and Zimbabwean women’s narratives of their abortion decision.Feminism & Psychology,
27(2), 203–224. doi:10.1177/0959353517699234
22.
CohenS. (2011).
The numbers tell the story: The reach and impact of Title X. Guttmacher Policy Review,
14(2), 20–23.
23.
ContiJ. A.BrantA. R.ShumakerH. D.ReevesM. F. (2016).
Update on abortion policy.Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology,
28, 517–521. doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000324
24.
DanielsC. R.FergusonJ.HowardG.RobertiA. (2016).
Informed or misinformed consent? Abortion policy in the United States.Journal of Health Politics, Policy, & Law,
41(2), 181–207. doi:10.1215/03616878–3476105
DodgeL. E.HoflerL. G.HackerM. R.HaiderS. (2017).
Patient satisfaction and wait times following outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared to electric vacuum aspiration in the operating room: A cross sectional study. Contraception & Reproductive Medicine,
2(18), 1–6. doi:10.1186/s40834-017-0045–6
DoranF.NancarrowS. (2015).
Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: A systematic review.Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care,
41, 170–180. doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2013–100862
29.
ElyG. E.DulmusC. N. (2010).
Abortion policy and vulnerable women in the United States: A call for social work policy practice.Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,
20(5), 658–671. doi:10.1080/10911351003749177
30.
ElyG. E.FlahertyC.AkersL. S.NolandT. B. (2012).
Social work student attitudes toward the social work perspective on abortion. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics,
9(2), 34–45. Retrieved from www.jswvearchives.com/fall2012/fall125.pdf
31.
ElyG. E.HalesT. W.JacksonD. L. (2018a).
A cross-cultural exploration of abortion fund patients in the United States and the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man.Culture, Health & Sexuality,
20(5), 560–573. doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1361550
32.
ElyG. E.HalesT.W.JacksonD. L.BowenE. A.MaguinE.HamiltonG. (2017a).
A trauma-informed examination of the hardships experienced by abortion fund patients.Health Care for Women International,
38(11), 1133–1151. doi:10.1080/07399332.2017.1367795
33.
ElyG. E.HalesT. W.JacksonD. L.MaguinE.HamiltonG. (2017b).
The undue burden of paying for abortion: An exploration of abortion fund cases.Social Work in Health Care,
56(2), 99–114. doi:10.1080/00981389.2016.1263270
34.
ElyG. E.MurshidN. S. (2017).
The association between intimate partner violence and distance traveled to access abortion in a nationally representative sample of abortion patients.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0886260517734861
35.
ElyG. E.Rouland PolmanteerR. S.CaronA. (2018b).
Access to abortion services in Tennessee: Does distance traveled and geographic location influence return for a second appointment as required by the mandatory waiting period policy?Health & Social Work,
44(1), 13–21. doi:10.1093/hsw/hly039
36.
ElyG. E.Rouland PolmanteerR. S.KottingJ. (2018c).
A trauma-informed framework for the abortion seeking experience.Social Work in Mental Health,
16(2), 172–200. doi:10.1080/15332985.2017.1369485
37.
FallotR. D.HarrisM. (2006). Trauma-informed services: A self-assessment and planning protocol.
Washington, DC:
Community Connections.
FeltnerF. J.ElyG. E.WhitlerE. T.GrossD.DignanM. (2012).
Effectiveness of community health workers in providing outreach and education for colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.Social Work in Health Care,
51(5), 430–440. doi:10.1080/00981389.2012.657296
40.
FosterD. G.GouldH.KimportK. (2012).
How women anticipate coping after an abortion.Contraception,
86(1), 84–90. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.002
41.
GelmanA.RosenfeldE. A.NikolajskiC. A.FreedmanL. R.SteinbergJ.BorreroS. (2017).
Abortion stigma among low-income women obtaining abortions in western Pennsylvania: A qualitative assessment.Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health,
49(1), 29–36. doi:10.1363/psrh.12014
42.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2004).
Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.Nurse Education Today,
24, 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
HalesT. W.GreenS. A.BissonetteS.WardenA.DieboldJ.KouryS.NochajskiT. H. (2019). Trauma-informed care outcome study. Research on Social Work Practice. 29(5), 529–539. doi:10.1177/1049731518766618
48.
HalesT. W.NochajskiT. H.GreenS. A.HitzelH. K.Woike-GangaE. (2017).
An association between implementing trauma-informed care and staff satisfaction.Advances in Social Work,
18(1), 300–312. doi:10.18060/21299
49.
HamamaL.RauchS.SperlichM.DefeverE.SengJ. (2010).
Previous experience of spontaneous or elective abortion and risk for posttraumatic stress and depression during subsequent pregnancy.Depression & Anxiety,
27(8), 699–707. doi:10.1002/da.20714
50.
HarrisL. H.MartinL.DebbinkM.HassingerJ. (2013).
Physicians, abortion provision and the legitimacy paradox.Contraception,
87(1), 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.031
51.
HarrisM.FallotR. D. (2001).
Envisioning a trauma-informed service system: A vital paradigm shift.New Directions for Mental Health Services,
89, 3–22. doi:10.1002/yd.23320018903
JohnsonB. R.MishraV.LavelanetA. F.KhoslaR.GanatraB. (2017).
A global database of abortion laws, policies, health standards and guidelines.Bulletin of the World Health Organization,
95, 542–544. doi:10.2471/BLT.17.197442
JonesR. K.JermanJ. (2017a).
Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,
49(1), 17–27. doi:10.1363/psrh.12015
56.
JonesR. K.JermanJ. (2017b).
Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008–2014.American Journal of Public Health,
107(12), 1904–1909. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042
57.
JordanB.WellsE. S. (2009).
A 21st-century Trojan horse: The abortion harms women anti-choice argument disguises a harmful movement.Contraception,
79, 161–164. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.008
58.
KarasekD.RobertsS. C. M.WeitzT. A. (2016).
Abortion patients’ experience and perceptions of waiting periods: Survey evidence before Arizona’s two-visit 24-hour mandatory waiting period law.Women’s Health Issues,
26(1), 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.004
59.
LundellI. W.OhmannS. G.FransO.HelstromL.HogbergU.NybergS., … & SvanbergA. S. (2013a).
Posttraumatic stress among women after induced abortion: A Swedish multi-centre cohort study. BMC Women’s Health,
13, 52–71. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-13–52
60.
LundellI. W.PoromaaI. S.FransO.HelstromL.HogbergU.MobyL.SyanbergA. K. (2013b).
The prevalence of posttraumatic stress among women requesting induced abortion.The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care,
18, 480–488. doi:10.3109/13625187.2013.828030
61.
MartinL. A.HassingerJ. A.DebbinkM.HarrisL. H. (2017).
Dangertalk: Voices of abortion providers.Social Science & Medicine,
184, 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.001
62.
MedoffM. H. (2010).
State abortion policies, targeted regulation of abortion provider laws, and abortion demand.Review of Policy Research,
27(5), 577–594. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00460.x
63.
MedoffM. H. (2016).
State abortion policy and unintended birth rates in the United States.Social Indicators Research,
129(2), 589–600. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1135-y
MihelicovaM.BrownM.ShurmanV. (2017).
Trauma-informed care for individuals with serious mental illness: An avenue for community psychology’s involvement in community mental health. Community Psychology,
61(1/2), 141–152. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12217
66.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). The safety and quality of abortion care in the United States.
Washington, DC:
The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/24950.
67.
National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2018). Social work speaks: National Association of Social Workers Policy Statements 2018–2020 – Reproductive justice.
Washington, DC:
NASW Press.
68.
NorrisA.BessettD.SteinbergJ. R.KavanaughM. L.De ZordoS.BeckerD. (2011).
Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes and consequences.Women’s Health Issues,
21(3), S49–S54. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010
69.
O’DonnellA. T.O’CarrollT.TooleN. (2018).
Internalized stigma and stigma-related isolation predict women’s psychological distress and physical health symptoms post abortion.Psychology of Women Quarterly,
42(2), 220–234. doi:10.1177/0361684317748937
QuadagnoJ. (2004).
Why the United States has no national health insurance: Stakeholder mobilization against the welfare state, 1945–1996. Journal of Health & Social Behavior,
45, s25–s44.
72.
RaymondE. G.GrimesD. A. (2012).
The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.Obstetrics & Gynecology,
119, 215–219. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923
73.
RebouchéR. (2016).
Abortion rights as human rights.Social & Legal Studies,
25(6), 765–782. doi:10.1177/0964663916668391
74.
RobertsS. C. M.BelusaE.TurokD. K.CombellickS.RalphL. (2017).
Do 72-hour waiting periods and two-visit requirements for abortion affect women's certainty? A prospective cohort study.Women's Health Issues,
27(4), 400–406. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2017.02.009
75.
RobertsS. C. M.GouldH.KimportK.WeitzT. A.FosterD. G. (2014).
Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.Women’s Health Issues,
24(2), e211–e218. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2014.01.003
76.
RobinsonG. E.StotlandN. L.RussoN. F.LangJ. A.OcchiogrossoM. (2009).
Is there an abortion trauma syndrome? Critiquing the evidence.Harvard Review of Psychiatry,
17(4), 268–290. doi:10.1080/10673220903149119.
77.
RosenJ. D. (2012).
The public health risks of crisis pregnancy centers.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,
44(3), 201–205. doi:10.1363/4420112
78.
RossL.SolingerR. (2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction.
Oakland:
University of California Press.
SedghG.BearakJ.SinghS.BankoleA.PopinchalkA.GanatraB., … & JohnstonH. B. (2016).
Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: Global, regional, and subregional levels and trends.The Lancet,
388(10041), 258–267. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380–4
81.
SedghG.SinghS.HussainR. (2014).
Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends.Studies in Family Planning,
45(3), 301–314. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.x
82.
SommersB. J.GunjaM. Z.FinegoldK.MuscoT. (2015).
Changes in self-reported insurance coverage, access to care, and health under the Affordable Care Act. Journal of the American Medical Association,
314(4), 366–374. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8421
83.
SteinbergJ.TschannJ. M.FurgersonD.HarperC. C. (2016).
Psychosocial factors and pre-abortion psychological health: The significance of stigma.Social Science & Medicine,
150, 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.007
84.
SteinbergJ. R.TrussellJ.HallK.GuthrieK. (2012).
Fatal flaws in a recent meta-analysis on abortion and mental health.Contraception,
86(5), 430–437. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.03.012
85.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration. (2019). National Center for trauma-informed care. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/nctic
TsevatD.MiracleJ.GalloM. (2016).
Evaluation of services at crisis pregnancy centers in Ohio.Contraception,
94(4), 391–392. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.037
90.
United Nations. General Assembly. (1979). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/
91.
VaismoradiM.TurunenH.BondasT. (2013).
Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.Nursing & Health Sciences,
15(3), 398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
92.
WolfM. R.GreenS. A.NochajskiT. H.MendelW. E.KusmalN. S. (2014).
We’re civil servants: The status of trauma-informed care in the community.Journal of Social Service Research,
40(1), 111–120. doi:10.1080/01488376.2013.845131
