The aim of this study is to examine various strategies of social work students for resolving conflicts between their personal and professional values in the atmosphere of rising conservatism in neoliberal Turkey. Grounded theory was chosen to reflect the feelings and thoughts of 34 students attending a creative drama-based group on critical value education designed by the researchers. Purposeful sampling was employed to identify the participants. Notes and memos, reflective diaries, in-group discussions and a semi-structured focus-group discussion were used to collect data. The data on the conflict resolving strategies of the students are discussed in detail within anti-oppressive perspective in social work practice, theory and education in a neoliberal and neoconservative Turkish context.
Findings
The study reveals three main categories of conflict resolution strategies: (1) “Suppression”: An uncomfortable way to neutralize personal values, (2) Stretching boundaries via “sanctification”, and (3) “Fatalism” and pussyfooting around the status-quo. Uncomfortable feelings and fears are the basic triggers of these strategies when personal and professional values are in conflict.
Applications
The study gives us insight about the necessity to be more emotionally reflective and powerful practitioners while challenging the uncomfortable feelings and fear triggered when personal and professional values are in conflict. We argue that we need to adopt anti-oppressive perspective in professional practice, theory and education to overcome conflicts between personal and professional values in a neoliberal context.
AcarF.AltunokG. (2013).
The ‘Politics of intimate’ at the intersection of neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism in contemporary Turkey.Women’s Studies International Forum,
41, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2012.10.001
2.
BanksS. (2006). Ethics and values in social work.
Basingstoke, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
BarnardA. (2008). Values, ethics and professionalization: A social work history. In BarnardA.HornerN.WildJ. (Eds.), The value base of social work and social care (pp. 5–24).
London, UK:
McGraw-Hill Education.
4.
BrandlerS. (1999).
The small structured group: A tool for teaching social work values.Social Work With Groups,
22 (1), 79–97. doi:10.1300/J009v22n01_06
5.
BuğraA.AdarS. (2007). Türkiye’nin kamu sosyal koruma harcamalarının karşılaştırmalı bir analizi (Comparative study on Turkish social welfare expenditures). The socio-political forum. Retrieved from http://www.spf.boun.edu.tr/docs/SocialPolicyWatch_Rapor__TR_.pdf
6.
BuğraA.KeyderÇ. (2006). Sosyal politika yazıları (Writings on social policy).
İstanbul, Turkey:
İletişim.
7.
BuzS.Cankurtaran ÖntaşÖ.HatibogluB. (2012).
Opinions of social work students from Turkey on social justice. International Social Work,
3(5), 187–196. doi:10.1177/0020872810382682
8.
CockerC.Hafford-LetchfieldT. (2014). Introduction: Rethinking anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice in social work; Time for new paradigms? In Hafford-LetchfieldT. (Ed.), Rethinking anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive theories for social work practice (pp. 4–19).
Basingstoke, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
CresswellJ. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.
Boston, USA:
Pearson.
10.
D’AprixA. S.DunlapK. M.AbelE.EdwardsR. L. (2004).
Goodness of fit: Career goals of MSW students and the aims of the social work profession in the United States. Social Work Education,
23, 265–280. doi:10.1080/0261547042000224029
11.
D’CruzH.GillinghamP.MelendezS. (2007).
Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work,
37(1), 73–90. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl001
12.
DedeoğluS. (2013).
Veiled Europeanisation of welfare state in turkey: Gender and social policy in the 2000s.Women’s Studies International Forum,
41(1), 7–13. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.03.009
13.
DoddingtonC. (2007).
Critical thinking as a source of respect for persons: A critique, Educational Philosophy and Theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory,
39(4), 449–459. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00350.x
14.
DolgoffR.HarringtonD.LoewenbergF. M. (2012). Ethical decisions for social work.
California, USA:
Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
15.
DominelliL. (1998). Anti-oppressive practice in context. In AdamsR.DominelliL.PayneM. (Eds.), Social work, themes, issues and critical debates (pp. 3–19).
Basingstoke, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
EderM. (2010).
Retreating state? Political economy of welfare regime change in Turkey.Middle East Law and Governance,
2, 152–184. doi:10.1163/187633710X500739
FergusonI.WoodwardR. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference.
Bristol, UK:
Policy Press.
19.
GambrillE. (1997). Social work practice: A critical thinker’s guide.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
20.
GibbonsJ.GrayM. (2004).
Critical thinking as integral to social work practice.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,
24, 19–38. doi:10.1300/J067v24n01_02
21.
Göçmen, İ. (2014).
Religion, politics and social assistance in Turkey: The rise of religiously motivated associations.Journal of European Social Policy,
24(1), 92–103. doi:10.1177/0958928713511278
22.
HighamP. (2006). Social work: Introducing professional practice.
London, UK:
Sage.
23.
HugmanR.SmithD. (1995). Ethical issues in social work: An overview. In HugmanR.SmithD. (Eds.), Ethical issues in social work (pp. 1–15).
London, UK:
Routledge.
24.
International Federation of Social Work. (IFSW, 2012). Global standards for the education and training of the social work profession. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/global-standards
JohnstonL. B. (2009).
Critical thinking and creativity in a social work diversity course: Challenging students to ‘think outside the box’.Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,
19(5), 646–656. doi:10.1080/10911350902988001
27.
LoyaM. A.CuevasM. (2010).
Teaching racism: Using experiential learning to challenge the status quo.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,
30(3), 288–299. doi:10.1080/08841233.2010.497130
28.
Melville-WisemanJ. (2013).
Teaching through the tension: Resolving religious and sexuality based schism in social work education.International Social Work,
56(3), 290–309. doi:10.1177/0020872812474485
29.
NorrisJ. (2000).
Drama as research: Realizing the potential of drama in education as a research methodology.Youth Theatre Journal,
14(1), 40–51. doi:10.1080/08929092.2000.10012516
30.
OsteenJ. P. (2011).
Motivations, values, and conflict resolution: Students’ integration of personal and professional identities.Journal of Social Work Education,
47(3), 423–444. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900131
31.
ParrottL. (2010). Values and ethics in social work practice.
Exeter, UK:
Learning Matters Inc.
32.
PartonN. (2001). Risk and professional judgement. In CullL. A.RocheJ. (Eds.), The law and social work: Contemporary issues for practice (pp. 61–70).
Basingstoke, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
StanfordS. (2010).
‘Speaking back’ to fear: Responding to the moral dilemmas of risk in social work practice.British Journal of Social Work,
40, 1065–1080. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp156
35.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.
London, UK:
Sage Publications.
36.
ThompsonN. (2012). Anti-discriminatory Practice (5th edition). BASW practical social work series. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
ThompsonN. (2009). Understanding social work: Preparing for practice.
Basingstoke, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
TittertonM. (2006). Risk and risk taking in health and social welfare.
London, UK:
Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
39.
ToprakB.Bozanİ.MorgülT.ŞenerN. (2009). Being different in Turkey (Research Report on Neighbourhood Pressure, no: BP43.T8). Retrieved from Open Society Foundation website: http://aciktoplumvakfi.org.tr/pdf/tr_farkli_olmak.pdf
40.
WahlerE. A. (2012).
Identifying and challenging social work students’ biases. Social Work Education,
31(8), 1058–1070. doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.616585
41.
WoodwardR.MackayK. (2012).
Mind the gap! Students’ understanding and application of social work values.Social Work Education,
31(8), 1090–1104. doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.608252
42.
YaraşS. (2014).
A historical synopsis of over-feminized local governance in neoliberal Turkey.Turkish Studies,
15(1), 100–116. doi:10.1080/14683849.2014.892239
43.
YılmazH.ErdoğanE.AtılganG. (2012). Türkiye’de muhafakarlık: aile, cinsellik, din (Conservatism in Turkey: Family, sexuality, religion). Retrieved from Open Society Foundation website: http://aciktoplumvakfi.org.tr/pdf/muhafazakarlik/04.pdf
