A case study of a grassroots truth and reconciliation commission from a community practice perspective

Abstract

Summary

Truth and Reconciliation Commissions represent an innovative model for social work practice. The Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission was a community-based intervention that sought to address lingering social trauma and tension from a 1979 incident of racial violence in North Carolina. This case study analyzes the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission from a community practice perspective by highlighting relevant aspects of the intervention for social work practice. The intervention is examined along the community practice dimensions of context, theoretical basis, practice model, framing, strategy, and tactics. Each dimension is presented and related to a specific aspect of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission case.

Findings

The historical context of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission includes legacies racism, labor exploitation, and violence that was pervasive in the U.S. south, as well as traditions of resistance to oppression. The theoretical underpinnings of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission include social constructionism and restorative justice. The Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission falls within the community practice models of neighborhood and community organizing and community capacity development. The intervention was framed as a Truth and Reconciliation Commission and incorporated a strategy of inclusiveness. The community practice tactics of fundraising, outreach and recruitment, research and investigation, and public hearings were employed.

Applications

This article concludes with assessments of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s impact and implications for community practice, including current applications of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission model in the U.S. Social workers working in communities can apply the Truth and Reconciliation Commission model and the specific community practice dimensions identified in the case study to empower communities and work to overcome legacies of social injustice, violence, and oppression.

Keywords

Social work community work case study human rights non-governmental organization participation reconciliation social justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Androff, D. (2008). Working in the mud: Community reconciliation and restorative justice in Timor Leste. In K. van Wormer (Ed.), Restorative justice across the East and the West (pp. 123–144). Hong Kong: Casa Verde Publishing.

Androff, D. (2010a). To not hate: Reconciliation among victims and participants of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Contemporary Justice Review, 13(3), 269–285.

Androff, D. (2010b). Truth and Reconciliation Commissions: An international human rights intervention and its connection to social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40(3), 1960–1977.

Androff, D. (2012a). Adaptations of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions in the North American context: Local examples of a global restorative justice intervention. Advances in Social Work: Special Issue on Global Problems and Local Solutions, 13(2), 408–419.

Androff, D. (2012b). Can civil society reclaim the truth? Results from a community-based Truth and Reconciliation Commission. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 6(2), 296–317.

Androff, D. (2012c). Narrative healing among victims of violence: The impact of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Families in Society, 93(1), 10–16.

Androff, D. (2012d). Reconciliation in a community based restorative justice intervention: Victim assessments of the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 39(4), 73–96.

Androff, D. (2013). Truth and Reconciliation Commissions and transitional justice in a restorative justice context. In K. van Wormer & L. Walker (eds.), Restorative justice today: Practical applications (pp. 205–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Androff, D. (2016). Practicing rights: Human rights-based approaches to social work practice. London: Routledge.

10.

Beck

Kropf

Leonard

(2011) Social work and restorative justice: Skills for dialogue, peacemaking, and reconciliation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

11.

Bermanzohn

(2003) Through survivors’ eyes: From the sixties to the Greensboro Massacre, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

12.

Bermanzohn

(2007) A massacre survivor reflects on the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Radical History Review 97: 102–109.

13.

Bobo

Kendall

Max

(2001) Organizing for social change: Midwest Academy manual for activists, Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press.

14.

Chafe

(1980) Civilities and civil rights: Greensboro, North Carolina, and the black struggle for freedom, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

15.

Fisher

(2005) History, context, and emerging issues for community practice. In: Weil

(ed.) The handbook of community practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 34–58.

16.

Gamble

Weil

(1995) Citizen participation. In: Edwards

(ed.) Encyclopedia of social work, 19th ed. Washington, DC: NASW Press, pp. 483–494.

17.

Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission (GTRC). (2006). Greensboro truth and reconciliation commission report. Retrieved from www.greensborotrc.org.

18.

Gutierrez

Lewis

Nagda

Wernick

Shore

(2005) Multicultural community practice strategies and intergroup empowerment. In: Weil

(ed.) The handbook of community practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 341–359.

19.

Hardcastle, D., Powers, P., & Wenocur, S. (2004). In D. Hardcastle (Ed.), Community practice: Theories and skills for social workers. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.

20.

Jewell

Collins

Gargotto

Dishon

(2009) Building the unsettling force: Social work and the struggle for human rights. Journal of Community Practice 17(3): 309–322.

21.

Lakoff

(2004) Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate, White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

22.

Magarrell, L., & Gutierrez, B. (2006). Lessons learned in truth-seeking: International experiences informing United States initiatives. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. Retrieved from http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-USA-Truth-Initiatives-2006-English.pdf.

23.

Magarrell

Wesley

(2008) Learning from Greensboro: Truth and reconciliation in the United States, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

24.

Morley

(2010) Review of Learning from Greensboro: Truth and reconciliation in the United States, L. Magarrell & J. Wesley. International Journal of Transitional Justice 4(1): 130–133.

25.

Prannis

Stuart

Wedge

(2003) Peacemaking circles: From crime to community, St. Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.

26.

Pyles

(2009) Where’s the “freedom” in free trade? Framing practices and global economic justice. Journal of Community Practice 17(1&2): 73–87.

27.

Rothman

(2008) Multi modes of community intervention. In: Rothman

Erlich

Tropman

(eds) Strategies of community intervention, Peosta, IA: Eddie Bowers Publishing Co, pp. 141–170.

28.

Salmond

(1995) Gastonia 1929: The story of the Loray Mill Strike, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

29.

Umbreit

Armour

(2011) Restorative justice dialogue: An essential guide for research and practice, New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

30.

Umfleet, L. (2006). 1898 Wilmington Race Riot Report. 1898 Wilmington Race Riot Commission. Research Branch, Office of Archives and History. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources. Retrieved from http://www.history.ncdcr.gov/1898-wrrc/report/report.htm.

31.

Van Wormer

(2009) Restorative justice as social justice for victims of gendered violence: A standpoint feminist perspective. Social Work 54(2): 107–116.

32.

Waller

(2002) Love and revolution: A political memoir: People’s history of the Greensboro Massacre, its setting and aftermath, Latham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

33.

Weil

(1996) Community building: Building community practice. Social Work 41(5): 481–499.

34.

Weil

Gamble

(2005) Evolution, models, and the changing context of community practice. In: Weil

(ed.) The handbook of community practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 117–149.

35.

Wheaton

(1987) Codename GREENKIL: The 1979 Greensboro killings, Athens: University of Georgia Press.

36.

Williams

(2009) Legitimacy and effectiveness of a grassroots Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Law and Contemporary Problems 72(2): 143–150.

37.

Yoder

(2005) The little book of trauma healing: When violence strikes and community security is threatened, Intercourse, PA: Good Books.

38.

Young

Park

(2009) Engaging diasporas in truth commissions: Lessons from the Liberia Truth and Reconciliation Commission Diaspora Project. International Journal of Transitional Justice 3(3): 341–361.