The number of compulsory admissions in Dutch psychiatry has increased in the past 25 years. The reduction of coercion with Family Group Conferences in youth care has been successful. How, when and under what conditions can Family Group Conferences reduce coercion in adult psychiatry, is subject of an extensive inquiry. This paper, however, focusses on the reverse question, namely, in what circumstances can Family Group Conferences not be deployed? An answer to this question provides insights regarding situations in which Family Group Conferences may (not) be useful. Barriers in 17 cases were examined using multiple case studies.
Findings
The following barriers emerged: (1) the acute danger in coercion situations, the limited time available, the fear of liability and the culture of control and risk aversion in mental health care; (2) the severity of the mental state of clients leading to difficulties in decision-making and communication; (3) considering an Family Group Conference and involving familial networks as an added value in crisis situation is not part of the thinking and acting of professionals in mental health care; (4) clients and their network (who) are not open to an Family Group Conference.
Applications
Awareness of the barriers for Family Group Conferences can help to keep an open mind for its capacity to strengthen the partnership between clients, familial networks and professionals. The application of Family Group Conferences can help to effectuate professional and ethical values of social workers in their quest for the least coercive care.
BergsethK. J.BouffardJ. A. (2007) The long-term impact of restorative justice programming for juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice35(4): 433–451.
2.
BroerJ.KoetsierH.MulderC. L. (2015) Stijgende trend in dwangtoepassing onder de Wet Bopz zet door; implicaties voor de nieuwe Wet verplichte geestelijke gezondheidszorg. [The number of compulsory admissions continues to rise: Implications for the new Dutch law on obligatory mental health care]. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie57(4): 240–247. Retrieved from www.tijdschriftvoorpsychiatrie.nl/assets/articles/57-2015-4-artikel-broer.pdf.
3.
BurnsG.FrüchtelF. (2014) Family group conference: A bridge between lifeworld and system. British Journal of Social Work44(5): 1147–1161.
4.
BurnsT.YeelesK.MolodynskiA.NightingaleH.Vazquez-MontesM.SheehanK. (2011) Pressures to adhere to treatment (‘leverage’) in English mental healthcare. The British Journal of Psychiatry199(2): 145–150.
5.
De BeusK.RodriguezN. (2007) Restorative justice practice: An examination of program completion and recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice35(3): 337–347.
6.
De JongG.SchoutG. (2010) Prevention of coercion in public mental health care with family group conferencing. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing17(9): 846–848.
7.
De JongG.SchoutG.AbmaT. (2014) Prevention of involuntary admission through Family Group Conferencing: A qualitative case study in community mental health nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing70(11): 2651–2662.
8.
De StefanoA.DucciG. (2008) Involuntary admission and compulsory treatment in Europe. International Journal of Mental Health37(3): 10–21.
9.
GarettP. M. (2009) Questioning Habermasian social work: A note on some alternative theoretical resources. British Journal of Social Work39(5): 867–883.
10.
GarettP. M. (2010) ‘Making social work more Habermasian?’ A rejoinder in the debate on Habermas. British Journal of Social Work40(6): 1754–1758.
11.
HabermasJ. (1981) Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action], Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
12.
HabermasJ. (1989) The structural transformation of the public sphere. An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, Cambridge, England, MA: MIT Press.
13.
HayesD.HoustonS. (2007) ‘Lifeworld’, ‘system’ and family group conferences: Habermas's contribution to discourse in child protection. British Journal of Social Work37(6): 987–1006.
14.
JennerJ. A. (1984) Opname voorkomende strategieën in de praktijk van de sociale psychiatrie [Srategies to prevent admissions in the practice of social psychiatry], Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Academisch proefschrift, Erasmus Universiteit.
15.
JennerJ. A. (2013) Directieve interventies in de acute psychiatrie [Directive interventions in acute psychiatry], Assen, the Netherlands: Koninklijke van Gorcum BV.
16.
JeongS.McGarrellE. F.Kroovand HippleN. (2012) Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: The Indianapolis restorative justice experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology8(4): 369–385.
17.
KatsakouC.BowersL.AmosT.MorrissR.RoseD.WykesT.PriebeS. l. (2010) Coercion and treatment satisfaction among involuntary clients. Psychiatric Services61(3): 286–292.
18.
KhazaalY.ManghiR.DelahayeM.MachadoA.PenzenstadlerL.MolodynskiA. (2014) Psychiatric advance directives, a possible way to overcome coercion and promote empowerment. Front Public Health2. (no issue number available), article 37.
19.
LiamputtongP. (2011) Focus group methodology, principles and practice, Londen, England: Sage Publications.
20.
Merkel-Holguin, L. (2004). Sharing power with the people: Family Group Conferencing as a democratic experiment. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 31(1), 155–173.
21.
MolodynskiA.RugkasaJ.BurnsT. (2010) Coercion and compulsion in community mental health care. British Medical Bulletin95(1): 105–119.
22.
MulderC. L.BroerJ.UitenbroekD.Van MarleP.Van HemertA. M.WierdsmaA. I. (2006) Versnelde stijging van het aantal inbewaringstellingen na de invoering van de Wet Bijzondere Opnemingen in Psychiatrische Ziekenhuizen (BOPZ) [Accelerated rise in the number of emergency compulsory admissions after the introduction of the Special Admissions to Psychiatric Hospitals Act]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde150(6): 319–322. Retrieved from www.ntvg.nl/artikelen/versnelde-stijging-van-het-aantal-inbewaringstellingen-na-de-invoering-van-de-wet.
23.
NatlandS.Malmberg-HeimonenI. (2014) A study of coordinator positionings in family group conferences. Nordic Social Work Research4(2): 158–172.
24.
NeyT.StoltzJ. A.MaloneyM. (2013) Voice, power, and discourse: Experiences of FGC participants in the context of child protection. Journal of Social Work13(2): 184–202.
25.
O'BrienA. J.GoldingC. G. (2003) Coercion in mental healthcare: The principle of least coercive care. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing10(2): 167–173.
26.
OwensC.OwenG.BelamJ.LloydK.RapportF.DonovanJ.LambertH. (2011) Recognising and responding to suicidal crisis within family and social networks: Qualitative study. BMJ343: d5801.
PattonM. (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
PellizzoniL. (2001) The myth of the best argument: Power, deliberation and reason. The British Journal of Sociology52(1): 59–86.
30.
PennellJ.EdwardsM.BurfordG. (2010) Expedited family group engagement and child permanency. Children and Youth Services Review32(7): 1012–1019.
31.
RoskesM. D. (2009) The role of coercion in public mental health practice. Psychiatric Services60(9): 1273.
32.
SalizeH. J.DressingH. (2004) Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European Union. The British Journal of Psychiatry184(2): 163–168.
33.
SeikkulaJ.AaltonenJ.AlakareB.HaarakangasK.KeränenJ.LehtinenK. (2006) Five-year experience of first-episode non affective psychosis in open-dialogue approach: Treatment principles, follow-up outcomes, and two case studies. Psychotherapy Research16(2): 214–228.
34.
SzmuklerG.AppelbaumP. (2008) Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. Journal of Mental Health17(3): 233–244.
35.
Van der PostL. F. M. (2012) IBS admission as an outcome. Factors predicting the probability of clients qualifying for compulsory emergency admission, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
36.
Van der PostL. F. M.PeenJ.DekkerJ. J. (2013) A prediction model for the incidence of civil detention for crisis clients with psychiatric illnesses: The Amsterdam study of acute psychiatry VII. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology49(2): 283–290.
37.
VoskesY.TheunissenJ.WiddershovenG. (2012) Best practices rondom dwangreductie in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg [Best practices concerning coercion reduction in mental health care], Amsterdam/Amersfoort, the Netherlands: VU medisch centrum & GGZ-Nederland.
38.
WallcraftJ.SteffenS.AmeringM. (2011) Service user and family perspectives on psychiatry for the person. The International Journal of Person Centered Medicine1(1): 152–154.
39.
WangE. W.LambertM. C.JohnsonL. E.BoudreauB.BreidenbachR.BaumannD. (2012) Expediting permanent placement from foster care systems: The role of family group decision-making. Children and Youth Services Review34(4): 845–850.
40.
WuH. C.TangI. C.LinW. I.ChangL. H. (2013) Professional values and attitude of psychiatric social workers toward involuntary hospitalization of psychiatric patients. Journal of Social Work13(4): 419–434.
