Social care policies advocate the provision of coordinated care and the involvement of the independent sector in service planning and delivery. This study explores the characteristics of the independent organisations involved in care coordination for older people, the tasks undertaken, and management of the interface between the commissioning authorities and these organisations. The findings are based on semistructured telephone interviews conducted in 2009 with representatives from 25 local authorities in England regarding 40 organisations.
Findings
All organisations identified are voluntary in nature. They were diverse in terms of size, staffing, and history, typically undertaking care coordination for discrete user groups but few exclusively for older people. A range of care coordination activities were reported: assessment, brokerage, support planning, and monitoring and review. The extent of their involvement in these activities varied markedly. Commissioning and contracting arrangements differed; most organisations had short-term contracts. The main mechanism of contract monitoring was activity data returns; there was a lack of more detailed service evaluation. Both opportunities and challenges exist with regard to the future role of voluntary organisations in care coordination.
Applications
This study highlights the potential for voluntary organisations to undertake care coordination activities. To achieve this, partnership working between service commissioners and these organisations is required, and funding and support are essential for provider organisations to develop appropriate infrastructures. Information governance arrangements are required to facilitate information sharing. The potential expansion of the role of voluntary organisations and the implications for practitioners with respect to their employment prospects are explored.
BernabeiR.LandiF.GambassiG.SgadariA.ZuccalaG.MorV.CarboninP. (1998) Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. British Medical Journal316(7141): 1348–1351.
5.
ChallisD. (1994) Care management. In: MalinN. (eds) Implementing community care, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, pp. 59–82.
6.
Challis, D., Hughes, J., Sutcliffe, C., & Xie, C. (2009). Care coordination arrangements for older people (Discussion Paper M216). Unpublished report. Manchester, UK: PSSRU, University of Manchester.
7.
Cm849 (1989) Caring for people: Community care in the next decade and beyond, London, UK: HMSO.
8.
Cm8378 (2012) Caring for our future: Reform care and support, London, UK: The Stationery Office.
9.
Cm4169 (1998) Modernising social services, London, UK: The Stationery Office.
10.
Cm7673 (2009) Shaping the future of care together, London, UK: The Stationery Office.
11.
Cm6499 (2005) Independence, well-being and choice: Our vision for adult social care in England, London, UK: The Stationery Office.
12.
Department of Health (1996) Carers (Recognition and Services) Act 1995: Policy guidance, London, UK: Department of Health.
13.
Department of Health (1999) Caring about carers: A national strategy for carers, London, UK: Department of Health.
14.
Department of Health (2001) Building capacity and partnership in care: An agreement between the statutory and the independent social care, health care and housing sectors, London, UK: Department of Health.
15.
Department of Health. (2002). Fair access to care services - Guidance on eligibility criteria for adult social care. LAC (2002)13. London, UK: Department of Health.
16.
Department of Health. (2006). Report of the third sector commissioning task force: Part II outputs and implementation. London, UK: Department of Health.
17.
Department of Health (2008a) Transforming social care, LAC (DH) (2008)1, London, UK: Department of Health.
18.
Department of Health (2008b) Commissioning for personalisation: A framework for local authority commissioners, London, UK: Department of Health.
19.
Department of Health (2008c) Carers at the heart of 21st century families and communities, London, UK: Department of Health.
20.
Department of Health (2009) Common assessment framework for adults, London, UK: Department of Health.
21.
Department of Health (2010a) A vision for adult social care: Capable communities and active citizens, London, UK: Department of Health.
GeronS. M. (2000) Care management in the United States. In: ApplebaumR.WhiteM. (eds) Key issues in care management around the globe, San Francisco, CA: American Society on Ageing, pp. 10–21.
24.
GlendinningC.ChallisD.FernandezJ.JacobsS.JonesK.KnappM.WilberforceM. (2008) Evaluation of the individual budgets pilot programme: Final report, York, UK: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
25.
Hafford-LetchfieldT. (2010) Social care management, strategy and business planning, London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
26.
HaynesP.BanksL.BallochS.HillM. (2006) Public policy and private provisions: Changes in residential care from 1991 to 2001. Health and Social Care in the Community14(6): 499–507.
27.
HM Government (2010) The compact. The Coalition Government and civil society organisations working effectively in partnership for the benefit of communities and citizens in England, London, UK: Cabinet Office.
28.
Home Office (1998) Compact on relations between the government and the voluntary and community sector in England, London, UK: HMSO.
29.
HuberD. L. (2000) The diversity of case management models. Lippincott's Case Management5(6): 248–255.
30.
HusseinS. (2009) The size, roles and stability of the social care workforce in England, London, UK: Social Care Workforce Periodical, King’s College London.
31.
IFF Research Ltd (2007) Third sector market mapping: Research report prepared for Department of Health, London, UK: Department of Health.
32.
IkegamiN. (2000) The development of care management in Japan and the impact of the new public long-term-care insurance. In: ApplebaumR.WhiteM. (eds) Key issues in care management around the globe, San Francisco, CA: American Society on Ageing, pp. 43–49.
LesterH.BirchwoodM.TaitL.ShahS.EnglandE.SmithJ. (2008) Barriers and facilitators to partnership working between Early Intervention Services and the voluntary and community sector. Health and Social Care in the Community16(5): 493–500.
35.
LordJ.HutchisonP. (2003) Individualised support and funding: Building blocks for capacity building and inclusion. Disability & Society18(1): 71–86.
36.
McGrathM.GrantG.RamcharanP.CaldockK.Parry-JonesB.RobinsonC. (1996) The roles and tasks of care managers in Wales. Community Care Management and Planning4: 185–194. doi:10.1108/14769018199600027.
37.
ManthorpeJ.SpencerL. (2008) Lessons from outsourcing adult social care: The workforce issues, London, UK: Improvement and Development Agency for local government (IDeA).
38.
MoxhamC. (2010) Challenges and enablers to engage voluntary organisations in public service delivery. Public Money & Management30(5): 293–298.
39.
National Council for Voluntary Organisations (2007) UK voluntary sector workforce almanac 2007, London, UK: NCVO.
40.
Policy Research Institute on AgeingEthnicity [PRIAE] (2005) Black and minority ethnic elders’ in the UK: Health and social care research findings, Leeds, UK: PRIAE.
41.
Reynolds, I. (2006). Systems of support and brokerage – independent brokerage: An exploration of models. West Sussex County Council, Independent Living Association, European Union, and ACE National. Retrieved from: http://www.ilawestsussex.org/docs/reports/Brokerage_models.pdf.
42.
ScourfieldP. (2010) Going for brokerage: A task of ‘independent support’ or social work?British Journal of Social Work40(3): 858–877.
43.
Social Services Inspectorate (1997a) Better management, better care. The sixth annual report of the Chief Inspector Social Services Inspectorate 1996/97, London, UK: Department of Health.
44.
Social Services Inspectorate (1997b) A service on the edge: Inspection of services for deaf and hard of hearing people, London, UK: Department of Health.
45.
Social Services Inspectorate (1998a) A sharper focus: Inspection of services for adults who are visually impaired or blind, London: Department of Health.
46.
Social Services Inspectorate (1998b) “They look after themselves, don’t they”? Inspection of community care services for black and ethnic minority older people, London, UK: Department of Health.
47.
Social Services Inspectorate (2000) Towards a common cause – ‘a Compact for care’: Inspection of local authority social services and voluntary sector working relationships, London, UK: Department of Health.
48.
Social Services Inspectorate and Social Work Services Group (1991) Care management and assessment: Practitioners’ guide, London, UK: HMSO.
49.
The Princess Royal Trust for Carers and Crossroads Caring for Carers (2008) Putting people first without putting carers second, Essex, UK: PRTC.
50.
WareP.MatosevicT.ForderJ.HardyB.KendallJ.KnappM. (2001) Movement and change: Independent sector domiciliary care providers between 1995 and 1999. Health and Social Care in the Community9(6): 334–340.
51.
WeihrichH. (1982) The TOWS matrix – a tool for situational analysis. Journal of Long Range Planning15(2): 54–66.
52.
WeinerK.StewartK.HughesJ.ChallisD.DartonR. (2002) Care management arrangements for older people in England: Key areas of variation in a national study. Ageing and Society22(4): 419–439.
53.
WellsY.SwerissenH.KendigH. (1999) Client outcomes in case managed care: Who benefits most?Australasian Journal on Ageing18(2): 79–85.
54.
XieC.HughesJ.ChallisD.StewartK. (2008) Care management arrangements for people with physical and sensory disabilities: Results of a national study. Research, Policy and Planning26(2): 87–100.
55.
ZarbG. (1995) The role of brokerage in developing the independent sector. In: AllenI.PerkinsE.DowlingS. B. (eds) Making it work: The practicalities of working with the independent sector, London, UK: PSI, pp. 68–78.
