Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Summary

It took teaching a family policy course for me to realize just how behind the United States is on ratifying international treaties – especially those pertaining to human rights. Though the U.S. expresses a commitment to human rights, has helped draft treaties that proclaim such, and has even signed many of these documents, this means nothing within the continental U.S. if the Senate does not ratify them. Herein, I discuss some of the reasons the U.S. has held back ratifying the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

Findings

Of important human rights instruments the U.S. has ratified, it has taken an average of nearly 30 years after signing for the Senate to ratify each. Though the U.S. often sets a precedent and example for other countries to follow, it has yet to ratify the CRC. Every other country (minus Somalia) has ratified the Convention. Yet, these countries may not see the importance of enforcing it if the U.S. does not value ratifying it.

Keywords

Social work children's rights human rights human rights instruments law social policy United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Engle

(2011) The Convention on the Rights of the Child. QLR. 29(3): 793–819. Retrieved from Index to Legal Periodicals & Books Full Text (H.W. Wilson).

Fass

P. S.

(2011) A historical context for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 633: 17–29.

Graham V. Florida, U.S. No. 08-7412 (2010).

Grahn-Farley

(2011) The U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child and the forgotten history of the White House Children’s Conferences, 1909–1971. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 20-1, 307–376. Retrieved from Index to Legal Periodicals & Books Full Text).

Gunn

T. J.

(2006) The religious right and the opposition to the U.S. ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Emory International Law Review. 20(1): 111–128. Retrieved from Index to Legal Periodicals & Books Full Text (H.W. Wilson).

Henning

(2010) Denial of the child’s right to counsel, voice, and participation in juvenile delinquency proceedings. Child Welfare. 89(5): 121–138. Retrieved from Medline with Full Text).

Lansky

(1997) Perspectives: Child labour: How the challenge is being met. International Labour Review. 136(2): 233–257. Retrieved from Family & Society Studies Worldwide).

Mason

M. A.

(2005) The U.S. and the international children’s rights crusade: Leader or laggard? Journal of Social History. 38(4): 955–963.

Pizzigati

(2010) Companion piece: The education landscape and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Child Welfare. 89(5): 91–102. Retrieved from MEDLINE with Full Text).

10.

Roper V. Simmons, 543 U. S. 551 (2005).

11.

Sullivan, J. V. (2007). How our laws are made. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CDOC-110hdoc49/pdf/CDOC-110hdoc49.pdf.

12.

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/crc/.

13.

United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2012). Consideration of reports submitted by states parties under article 44 of the Convention. Concluding observations: Syrian Arab Republic. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/MENARegion/Pages/SYIndex.aspx.

14.

United States Constitution. Art. II, § 2. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html.

The U.S. and the Convention on the Rights of the Child: What’s the hold-up?