• Summary: Recent rampage shootings at schools have provoked intense academic discussion. While there have been two recent school shootings in Finland, there is not much empirical research focusing on these incidents. What is particularly lacking is research on community reaction to this type of mass violence. In this article, we take a look at the negative aspects of solidarity after a shooting incident in a small Finnish community of Jokela. We explore community experience on shootings through two types of empirical measures. The research material consists of a mail survey of the local residents and focused interviews of professional experts.
• Findings: Our results suggest that there was a rise in social solidarity after the shooting tragedy. However, the increased level of solidarity was also followed by a variety of negative phenomena such as strengthened group divisions between youth and adults, social stigmatization, and feelings of collective guilt. These experiences are familiar in the cultural trauma processes.
• Applications: In general, the article points out that mass violence has long-term impact on people’s social engagement and interaction patterns. Similar processes can be argued to be particularly significant when studying relatively small communities.
AbramsC. B.AlbrightK.PanofskyA. (2004). Contesting the New York community: From liminality to the ‘new formal’ in the wake of September 11. City and Community, 3(3), 189–220.
2.
AddingtonL. A. (2003). Students’ fear after Columbine: Findings from a randomized experience. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(4), 367–387.
3.
AlexanderJ. C. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In AlexanderJ. C.EyermanR.GiesenB.SmelserN. J.SztompkaP. (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 1–30). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
4.
AltheideD. L. (2009). The Columbine shootings and the discourse of fear. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1354–1370.
5.
BartonA. H. (1969). Communities in disaster: A sociological analysis of collective stress. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
6.
BreakwellG. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. London: Methuen and Co.
7.
CarrollM.HigginsL.CohnP.BurchfieldJ. (2006). Community wildfire events as a source of social conflict. Rural Sociology, 71(2), 261–280.
8.
CollinsR. (2004). Rituals of solidarity and security in the wake of terrorist attack. Sociological Theory, 22(1), 53–87.
9.
CresswellJ. W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE.
10.
DeLisiM. (2002). The Columbine High School massacre and criminal justice system response: An exploratory case study. The Social Science Journal, 39(1), 19–29.
11.
DillenburgerK.AkhonzadaR.FargasM. (2008). Community services for people affected by violence. Journal of Social Work, 8(1), 7–27.
12.
DonnanH.SimpsonK. (2007). Silence and violence among Northern Ireland border Protestants. Ethnos, 72(1), 5–28.
13.
DrabekT. E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14.
DurkheimÉ (1893/1967). De la division du travail social. Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France.
15.
EriksonK. T. (1976). Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon and Schuster.
16.
FarrellK. (1998). Post-traumatic culture. Injury and interpretation in the nineties. Baltimore, MD and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
FeinA. H.IsaacsonN. S. (2009). Echoes of Columbine. The emotion work of leaders in school shooting sites. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1327–1346.
18.
FoxC.HardingD. J. (2005). School shootings as organizational deviance. Sociology of Education, 78(1), 69–97.
19.
FreudenburgW. R. (1997). Contamination, corrosion and the social order: An overview. Current Sociology, 45(3), 19–39.
20.
FritzC. E. (1961). Disasters. In MertonR. K.NisbetR. (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 651–694). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
21.
FurediF. (2004). Therapy culture. Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London and New York: Routledge.
22.
HardingD. J.FoxC.MehtaJ. D. (2002). Studying rare events through qualitative case studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 31(2), 174–217.
23.
HeikkinenM. (2009). Kauhajoen jälkeen poliisin tietoon on tullut 250 koulu-uhkausta [A total of 250 threats have been reported to the police after Kauhajoki]. Helsingin Sanomat, 8 March.
24.
HoffmanS. M. (1999). The worst of times, the best of times: Toward a model of cultural response to disaster. In Oliver-SmithA.HoffmanS. M. (Eds.), The angry earth. Disaster in anthropological perspective (pp. 134–155). London and New York: Routledge.
25.
JeffriesV.JohnstonB.NicholsL.OlinerS.TiryakianE.WeinsteinJ. (2006). Altruism and social solidarity: Envisioning a field of specialization. The American Sociologist, 37(3), 67–83.
26.
KleinJ. (2005). Teaching her a lesson: Media misses boys’ rage relating to girls in school shootings. Crime Media Culture, 1(1), 90–97.
27.
LarkinR. W. (2009). The Columbine legacy. Rampage shootings as political acts. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1309–1326.
28.
LevinJ.MadfisE. (2009). Mass murder at school and cumulative strain. A sequential model. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1227–1245.
29.
LindenbergS.FetchenhauerD.FlacheA.BuunkA. P. (2006). Solidarity and prosocial behaviour: A framing approach. In FetchenhauerD.FlacheA.BuunkA. P.LindenbergS. (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behaviour. An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 23–44). New York: Springer.
30.
LoweS.FothergillA. (2003). A need to help: Emergent volunteer behavior after September 11th. In MondayJ. (Ed.), Beyond September 11th: An account of post-disaster research. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado.
31.
ManktelowR. (2007). The needs of victims of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Work, 7(1), 31–50.
32.
MuschertG. W. (2007a). The Columbine victims and the myth of the juvenile superpredator. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(4), 351–366.
33.
MuschertG. (2007b). Research in school shootings. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 60–80.
34.
MuschertG. W.CarrD. (2006). Media salience and frame changing across events: Coverage of nine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 747–766.
35.
NewmanK.FoxC. (2009). Repeat tragedy. Rampage shootings in American High School and College settings, 2002–2008. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1286–1308.
36.
NewmanK.FoxC.HardingD.MehtaJ.RothW. (2004). Rampage. The social roots of school shootings. New York: Basic Books.
37.
O’DonnelD.Schwab-StoneM. E.MuyeedA. Z. (2002). Multidimensional resilience in urban children exposed to community violence. Child Development, 73(4), 1265–1282.
38.
PittaroM. L. (2007). School violence and social control theory: An evaluation of the Columbine massacre. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2(1), 1–12.
39.
QuarantelliE. L.DynesR. R. (1977). Response to social crisis and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 3(1), 23–49.
40.
RaittilaP.JohanssonK.JuntunenL.KangasluomaL.KoljonenK.KumpuV.PernuI.VäliverronenJ. (2008). Jokelan koulusurmat mediassa [Jokela School Shootings in the Media], Publications of the Department of Journalism and Mass Communication A 105. University of Tampere.
41.
RyanJ.HawdonJ. (2008). From individual to community: The ‘framing’ of 4-16 and the display of social solidarity. Traumatology, 14(1), 43–51.
42.
SeltzerM. (1997). Wound culture: Trauma in the pathological public sphere. October, 80, 3–26.
43.
SmelserN. J. (2004a). Psychological and cultural trauma. In AlexanderJ. C.EyermanR.GiesenB.SmelserN. J.SztompkaP. (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 31–59). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
44.
SmelserN. J. (2004b). Epilogue: September 11, 2001, as cultural trauma. In AlexanderJ. C.EyermanR.GiesenB.SmelserN. J.SztompkaP. (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 264–282). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
45.
SorokinP. A. (1947). Society, culture, and personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.
46.
SorokinP. A. (1954). The ways and power of love. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
SteffenS. L.FothergillA. (2009). 9/11 volunteerism: A pathway to personal healing and community engagement. Social Science Journal, 46(1), 29–46.
49.
StraussC. (2007). Blaming for Columbine. Conceptions of agency in the contemporary United States. Current Anthropology, 48(6), 807–832.
50.
SweetS. (1998). The effect of a natural disaster on social cohesion: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16(3), 321–331.
51.
SztompkaP. (2000). Cultural trauma: The other face of social change. European Journal of Social Theory, 3(4), 449–466.
52.
TajfelH. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39.
53.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (1998). Mixed methodology. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 46). London: SAGE.
54.
TurkelG. (2002). Sudden solidarity and the rush to normalization: Toward an alternative approach. Sociological Focus, 35(1), 73–79.
55.
WebbG. R. (2002). Sociology, disasters, and terrorism: Understanding threats of the new millennium. Sociological Focus, 35(1), 87–95.
56.
WildeL. (2007). The concept of solidarity: Emerging from the theoretical shadows?. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(1), 171–181.
