• Summary: This article argues that ICT has been viewed with suspicion and has been narrowly used in social work primarily for managerial and monitoring purposes. In light of the emphasis within social work on empowerment, the potential of ICT to facilitate empowering practice is explored
• Findings: The article argues the social work profession should more actively challenge and resist the limited use made of ICT, and promote the appropriate use of ICT to improve social work practice and empower service users.
• Applications : The article provides a rationale for using ICT in social work to address issues of service user powerlessness and economic and social exclusion. The potential uses to which ICT might be put within social work are discussed and examples are given of innovative social practice using ICT that could be usefully developed more widely.
Ahuja, M.K. (2002) Women in the Information Technology Profession: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda, European Journal of Information Systems11: 20-34.
2.
Alexander, S. and Boud, D. (2001) Learners Still Learn From Experience When Online , in J. Stephenson (ed.) ( 2001) Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies , pp. 3-15. London: Kogan Page.
3.
Barnett-Queen,T. (2001) Attitudes and Opinions Regarding the Use of the Internet for Continuing Education among Social Workers, Journal of Technology in Human Services18: 145-69.
4.
Baron, N. (2004) See You Online: Gender Issues in College Student Use of Instant Messaging, Journal of Language and Social Psychology23(4): 397-423.
5.
Bostock, L. (2004) Promoting Resilience in Fostered Children and Young People. London: SCIE.
6.
Braye, S. and Preston-Shoot, M. (1995) Empowering Practice in Social Care. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7.
Cabinet Office White Paper (2000) E-Government: A Strategic Framework for Public Services in the Information Age, available online at: [http://www.iagchampions.gov.uk/Strategy.html ], accessed May 2005.
8.
Caputo, R. (1988) Management and Information Systems in Human Services . New York: Haworth Press.
9.
Cheta, R. (2004) Disabled People, ICTs and a New Age of Activism: A Portuguese Accessibility Special Interest Group Study, in E. van de Donk, B. Loader , P. Nixon and D. Rucht (eds) Cyberprotest, New Media, Citizens and Social Movements, pp. 207-32. London: Routledge.
10.
Curtice, J. and Norris, P. (2004) If You Build a Political Website, Will They Come? The Supply and Demand Model of New Technology, Social Capital, and Civic Engagement in Britain, paper for APSA, Chicago, IL, August.
11.
Day, S.X. and Schneider, P.L. (2002) Psychotherapy Using Distance Technology: A Comparison of Face to Face, Audio and Video Treatment, Journal of Counselling Psychology49(4): 499-503.
12.
DfES (2002) Young People and ICT, available online at: [http://www.becta.org.uk/research/research.cfm?section=1&id=547], accessed 18 May 2005.
13.
Department of Health (2005) available online at: [http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/InformationPolicy/InformationForSocialCare/fs/en ], accessed 3 April 2006.
14.
Doolin, B. (2004) Power and Resistance in the Implementation of a Medical Management Information System, Information Systems Journal14: 343-62.
15.
English, D.J., Brandford, C.C. and Coghlan, L. (2000) Data-Based Organizational Change: The Use of Administrative Data to Improve Child Welfare Programs and Policy, Child Welfare79(5): 499-515.
16.
Finn, J., Kerman, B. and LeCornec, J. (2004) Reducing the Digital Divide for Children in Foster Care: First-Year Evaluation of the Building Skills-Building Futures Program , Research on Social Work Practice15(6): 470-80.
17.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2002) Critical Theory, Information Society and Surveillance Technologies: Information, Communication and Society, Critical Social Policy5(3): 357-78.
18.
Foley, P. and Ram, M. (2002) The Use of Online Technology by Ethnic Minority Businesses: A Comparative Study of the West Midlands and UK, De Montfort University, available online at: [ http://www.sbs.gov.uk/SBS_Gov_files], accessed 24 March 2006 .
19.
Gershon, P. (2004) Releasing Resources to the Front Line: Independent Review of Public Efficiency. London: HMSO.
20.
Glastonbury, B. (1985) Computers in Social Work. British Association of Social Workers (BASW) Practical Social Work. London: Macmillan.
21.
Gould, N. (2003) The Caring Professions and Information Technology: In Search of a Theory, in E. Harlow and S.A. Webb (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in the Welfare Services, pp. 29-48. London : Jessica Kingsley.
22.
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of CommunicativeAction, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Polity .
23.
Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity.
24.
Harris, J. (1998) Managing State Social Work. Aldershot: Ashgate.
25.
Harris, J. (2003) The Social Work Business. London : Routledge.
26.
Heng, M. and de Moor, A. (2003) From Habermass Communicative Theory to Practice on the Internet, Information Systems Journal13: 331-52.
27.
Henman, P. and Adler, M. (2003) Information Technology and the Governance of Social Security, Critical Social Policy23(2): 139-64.
28.
Henwood, F. and Hart, A. (2003) Articulating Gender in the Context of ICTs in Health Care: The Case of Electronic Patient Records in the Maternity Services, Critical Social Policy23(2): 249-67.
29.
Humphries, P. and Camilleri, P. (2002) Social Work and Technology: Challenges for Social Workers in Practice: A Case Study, Australian Social Work55(4): 251-9.
30.
Jones, R. (2003) Internet Inequality in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Consumer Council.
31.
Kenyon, S., Lyons, G. and Rafferty, J. (2002) Transport and Social Exclusion: Investigating the Possibility of Promoting Inclusion through Virtual Mobility, Journal of Transport Geography10(3): 207-19.
32.
Kraus, D.R. and Horan, E.R. (1997) Outcomes Roadblocks: Problems and Solutions, Behavioural Health Management17(5): 22-6.
33.
LaMendola, W.,Glastonbury, B. and Toole, S. (eds) ( 1989) A Casebook of Computer Applications in the Social and Human Services. New York: Haworth Press.
34.
Lianos, M. (2003) Social Control after Foucault, Surveillance and Society1(3): 412-30.
35.
Li Feng, L. and Gillespie, A. (1994) Teleworking, Work Organisation and the Workplace , in R. Mansell (ed.) Management of Information and Communications Technologies: Emerging Patterns of Control , pp. 165-88. London: ASLIB.
36.
Liff, S. and Shepherd, A. (2004) An Evolving Gender Digital Divide? OII Issue Brief No. 2. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
37.
Loader, B. and Keeble, L. (2004) Challenging the Digital Divide? A Literature Review of Community Informatics Initiatives. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
38.
MacGowan, M. and Beaulaurier, R.L. (2005) Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software in Teaching About Group Work Practice, in R.L. Beaulaurier and M. Haffey (eds) Technology in Social Work Education and Curriculum: The High Tech, High Touch Social Work Educator, pp. 45-56. New York, Haworth Social Work Press.
39.
Marlin-Bennett, R. (2004) Knowledge Power: Intellectual Property, Information, and Privacy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
40.
Marson, S.M. (1997) A Selective History of Internet Technology and Social Work, Computers in Human Services14(2): 35-49.
41.
Moon, S.S. and DeWeaver, K.L. (2005) Electronic Advocacy and Social Welfare Policy Education , in R.L. Beaulaurier and M. Haffey (eds) Technology in Social Work Education and Curriculum: The High Tech, High Touch Social Work Educator, pp. 57-68. New York: Haworth Social Work Press.
42.
OSullivan, P., Hunt, S. and Lippert, L. (2004) Mediated Immediacy: A Language of Affiliation in a Technological Age, Journal of Language and Social Psychology23(4): 464-90.
43.
Parks, M.R. and Floyd, K. (1996) Making Friends in Cyberspace, Journal of Communication46(1): 80-97.
44.
Phillips, D. and Berman, Y. (1995) Human Services in the Age of New Technology Harmonising Social Work and Computerization. Berggasse: European Centre.
45.
Pini, B., Brown, K. and Previte, J. (2004) Politics and Identity in Cyberspace: A Case Study of Australian Women in Agriculture Online, in E. van de Donk, B. Loader, P. Nixon and D. Rucht (eds) Cyberprotest, New Media, Citizens and Social Movements , pp. 259-75. London: Routledge.
46.
Salmon, G. (2001) E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan Page.
47.
Sapey, B. (1997) Social Work Tomorrow: Towards a Critical Understanding of Computers in Social Work, British Journal of Social Work27(6): 803-14.
48.
Schon, D.A., Sanyal, B. and Mitchell, W.J. (2000) High Technology and Low-Income Communities (Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology). London: The MIT Press.
49.
Scie (2004) Report available online at: [http://www.elfs.org.uk/consultation-paper/02-context.html ], accessed 19 May 2005.
50.
Scie (2005) Practice Guide 3: Fostering, available online at: [http://www.scie.org.uk/fostering/ ], accessed 27 September 2006.
51.
Shaw, A. and Shaw, M. (2000) Social Empowerment through Community Networks, in D. Schon, B. Sanyal and W. Mitchell (eds) High Technology and Low-Income Communities (Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology), pp. 315-36. London: The MIT Press.
52.
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S. and Furlong, J. (2003) The Information Aged: Older Adults Use of Information and Communications Technology in Everyday Life, Working Paper Series Paper 36, Cardiff University, Wales.
53.
Thomas, M. and Pierson, J. (1995) Dictionary of Social Work. London: Collins Educational.
54.
Walther, J.B. and Burgoon, J.K. (1992) Relational Communication in Computer Mediated Interaction , Human Communication Research19: 50-88.
55.
Wright, J.K. (2004) Developing On-line Text Based Counselling in the Workplace, in G. Bolton, S. Howlett, C. Lago and J.K. Wright (eds) Writing Cures: An Introductory Handbook of Writing in Counselling and Therapy, pp. 142-50. London: Routledge.
