This article is set in the context of current policy changes in child care social work.Whereas previously, social workers were encouraged to focus mainly on child protection concerns, they are now required to ensure both that all children in need receive proper assessment and support and that children at risk of significant harm are adequately safeguarded. A key consequence of this policy shift is that front-line social workers are being asked to make clearer distinctions at an early stage between these two sets of concerns. This study draws on research into 400 child protection/children in need cases before and after implementing these policy changes. It points to ways in which social workers and their managers can monitor whether the decisions they are making are placing the right emphasis on safeguarding and support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bridge Child Care Consultancy Service (1998) Dangerous Care: Working to Protect Children. London: The Bridge .
2.
Bridge Child Care Consultancy Service (1999) Neglect and Developmental Delay: Part 8 Case Review Overview Report Re: Case 1/99 in Caerphilly. Newbury: Bridge Publishing House .
3.
Butler-Sloss, Lord Justice E. (1988) Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland 1987. DHSS Cmnd 412. London: HMSO .
4.
Caerphilly Area Child Protection Committee (1998) James Report. Part 8 Case Review re `W' Case. Caerphilly: Caerphilly ACPC .
5.
Cleaver, H. and Freeman, P. (1995) Parental Perspectives in Cases of Suspected Child Abuse. London: HMSO .
6.
Cleaver, H., Unell, J. and Aldgate, J. (1999) Children's Needs - Parenting Capacity: the Impact of Parental Mental Illness, Problem Alcohol and Drug Use, and Domestic Violence on Children's Development. London: The Stationery Office .
7.
Clyde, the Lord (1992) Report of the Inquiry into the Removal of Children from Orkney in February 1991. HoC 195. London: HMSO .
8.
Corby, B. (1996) `Risk Assessment in Child Protection Work', in H. Kemshall and J. Pritchard (eds) Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. London: Jessica Kingsley .
9.
Corby, B. (1987) Working with Child Abuse. Buckingham: Open University Press .
10.
Corby, B. (2000) Child Abuse: Towards a Knowledge Base. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .
11.
Corby, B., Doig, A. and Roberts, V. (2001) Public Inquiries into the Abuse of Children in Residential Care. London: Jessica Kingsley .
12.
Dartington Social Research Unit (1995) Child Protection: Messages from Research. London: HMSO .
13.
Department of Health (DoH) (1991a) Working Together under the Children Act 1989: A Guide to Arrangements for Inter-agency Cooperation for the Protection of Children from Abuse. London: HMSO .
14.
Department of Health (DoH) (1991b) Child Abuse: A Study of Inquiry Reports 1980-1989. London: HMSO .
15.
Department of Health (DoH) (1998) The Quality Protects Programme: Transforming Children's Services. LAC (98) 26. London: Department of Health .
16.
Department of Health (DoH) (1999) Working Together to Safeguard Children: A Guide to Inter-Agency Working to Safeguard and Promote the Welfare of Children. London: The Stationery Office .
17.
Department of Health (DoH) (2000) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families. London: The Stationery Office .
18.
Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) (1974) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Care and Supervision Provided in Relation to Maria Colwell. London: HMSO .
19.
Erooga, M. and Masson, H., eds (1999) Children and Young People who Sexually Abuse Others: Challenges and Responses. London: Routledge .
20.
Farmer, E. and Owen, M. (1995) Child Protection Practice: Private Risks and Public Remedies. London: HMSO .
21.
Ferguson, H. (1990) `Rethinking Child Protection Practices: A Case for History', in Violence against Children Study Group, Taking Child Abuse Seriously. London: Unwin Hyman .
22.
Finkelhor, D. (1993) `Epidemiological Factors in the Clinical Identification of Child Sexual Abuse' , Child Abuse and Neglect17(1): 67-70 .
23.
Freeman, M. (2000) `Child Abuse: The Search for a Solution', in M. Freeman (ed.) Overcoming Child Abuse: A Window on a World Problem. Aldershot: Ashgate .
24.
Gibbons, J., Conroy, S. and Bell, C. (1995) Operating the Child Protection System: A Study of Child Protection Practices in English Local Authorities. London: HMSO .
25.
Greenwich, London Borough of (1987) A Child in Mind: The Protection of Children in a Responsible Society. The Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Kimberley Carlile. London Borough of Greenwich .
26.
Howe, D. (1992) `Child Abuse and the Bureaucratisation of Social Work' , Sociological Review40(3): 491-508 .
27.
Laming, Lord (2003) The Victoria Climbié Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office .
28.
Munro, E. (2002) Effective Child Protection. London: Sage
29.
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (1996) Childhood Matters: The Report of the National Commission of Inquiry into the Prevention of Child Abuse, Vol. 1. London: HMSO .
30.
Parton, N. (1985) The Politics of Child Abuse. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
31.
Social Services Inspectorate (2001) Developing Quality to Protect Children: SS Inspections of Children's Services. August 1999-July 2001 (Author K. Adams). London: Department of Health .
32.
Thoburn, J., Lewis, A. and Shemmings, D. (1995) Paternalism or Partnership? Family Involvement in the Child Protection Process. London: HMSO .
33.
Thorpe, D. (1994) Evaluating Child Protection. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .
34.
Tunstill, J. (1997) `Implementing the Family Support Clauses of the 1989 Children Act: Legislative, Professional and Organisational Obstacles', in N. Parton (ed.) Child Protection and Family Support: Tensions, Contradictions and Possibilities, pp. 39-58. London: Routledge .
35.
Wald, M. and Woolverton, M. (1990) `Risk Assessment: The Emperor's New Clothes?' , Child Welfare69(3): 483-511 .
36.
Wattam, C. (1997) `Can Filtering Processes be Rationalised?', in N. Parton (ed.) Child Protection and Family Support: Tensions, Contradictions and Possibilities, pp. 109-125. London: Routledge .
