Specifying the geographical scope of the research is relatively common in tourism. This is one possible approach to recognizing the importance of the context to the research and its results. This research note aims to analyze the effect of the geographical emphasis on citations to tourism articles. This is achieved by analyzing the citations of 31,330 articles from 50 tourism journals. The results show that focusing on the geographical scope of the research yields lower expected citations. Articles with country or region names in their titles are cited less frequently than their counterparts. The expected number of citations is 9.9 lower for titles with country names and 10.2 lower for titles with region names. These results shed light on characteristics of impactful research.
ÇakarKAykolŞ (2020) Case study as a research method in hospitality and tourism research: a systematic literature review (1974–2020). Cornell Hospitality Quarterly62(1): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520971281
2.
ChengZDimokaAPavlouPA (2016) Context May be king, but generalizability is the emperor. Journal of Information Technology31(3): 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0005-7
3.
CorreiaARodriguesPMMKozakM, et al. (2024) Determinants of citations in tourism and hospitality studies. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal72(3): 393–409. https://doi.org/10.37741/t.72.3.8
4.
CoxKREvenhuisE (2020) Theorising in urban and regional studies: negotiating generalisation and particularity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society13(3): 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa036
DavisonRMMartinsonsMG (2016) Context is king! considering particularism in research design and reporting. Journal of Information Technology31(3): 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.19
7.
GambleJHewlettL (2025) Working across the gap: the ongoing challenge of generalizability in qualitative research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education49: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2025.2544015
LeeASBaskervilleRL (2012) Conceptualizing generalizability: new contributions and a reply. MIS Quarterly36(3): 749–761. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703479
MoradiEKazemiNSalehipourMR, et al. (2025) A quarter-century of contributions to tourism scholarship: tracing historical themes and citation patterns in current issues in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism29: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2446978
13.
NunkooRHallCMRughoobur-SeetahS, et al. (2019) Citation practices in tourism research: toward a gender conscientious engagement. Annals of Tourism Research79: 102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102755
14.
PolatEÇelikFAriciHE, et al. (2024) Predictors of citations: an analysis of highly-cited-papers in hospitality and tourism research using a machine learning approach. Current Issues in Tourism29: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2446410
15.
PriemJPiwowarHOrrR (2022) OpenAlex: a fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01833
16.
PudelkoM (2006) Universalities, particularities, and singularities in cross-national management research. International Studies of Management & Organization36(4): 9–37. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825360401
zur HeidenP (2020) Considering context in design science research: a systematic literature review. In: HofmannSMüllerORossiM (eds) Designing for Digital Transformation. Co-Creating Services with Citizens and Industry. DESRIST 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, Vol. vol 12388, pp. 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_21
