Home detention with electronic monitoring was introduced in New Zealand in October 1999. It is an early release option for people sentenced to varying lengths of imprisonment. Detainees, as they are called, are released to their homes, and monitored by means of an electronic bracelet attached to their ankle. Detainees are supported and supervised by the probation service, as well as their families and sponsors. This article outlines the development of home detention in New Zealand and discusses the findings of research undertaken by the authors in 2001. Home detention has, on the whole, been viewed positively, but the negative impacts on families and children, and the broader acceptance of electronic monitoring in New Zealand, reveal a worrying level of tolerance for the coercive surveillance of families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aungles, A. (1995) `Three Bedroomed Prisons in the Asia Pacific Region: Home Imprisonment and Electronic Surveillance in Australia, Hawaii, and Singapore' , Just Policy March (2): 32-37 .
2.
Bonta, J., S. Wallace-Capretta and J. Rooney (1999) Electronic Monitoring in Canada. Canada: Solicitor General Canada, Public Works and Government Services .
3.
Church, A. and S. Dunstan (1997) Home Detention: The Evaluation of the Home Detention Pilot Programme 1995-1997. Wellington: Ministry of Justice .
4.
Corbett, R. and G. Marx (1991) `No Soul in the Machine: Technofallacies in the Electronic Monitoring Movement' , Justice Quarterly8: 399-414 .
5.
Dodgson, K., E. Mortimer and D. Sugg (2000) Assessing Prisoners for Home Detention Curfew: A Guide for Practitioners. UK: Home Office .
6.
Dodgson, K., P. Goodwin, P. Howard, S. Llewellyn-Thomas, E. Mortimer, N. Russell and M. Weiner (2001) Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: An Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. Home Office Research Study No. 222. UK: Home Office .
7.
Doherty, D. (1995) `Impressions of the Impact of the Electronic Monitoring Program on the Family', in K. Schulz (ed.) Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, the Operation, the Research, pp. 129-139. Canada: Simon Fraser University .
8.
Enos, R., J.E. Holman and M.E. Caroll (1998) Alternative Sentencing. US: Wyndhamhall .
9.
Fox, R.G. (1987) `Dr Schwitzgebel's Machine Revisited: Electronic Monitoring of Offenders' , Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology20(2): 131-147 .
10.
Gibbs, A. and D. King (2001) The Electronic Ball and Chain? The Development, Operation and Impact of Home Detention in New Zealand. Dunedin: Community and Family Studies, University of Otago .
11.
Gibbs, A. and D. King (2002a) `Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring in New Zealand and Its Implications for Probation' , VISTA7(2): 100-110 .
12.
Gibbs, A. and D. King (2002b) `Alternatives to Custody in the New Zealand Criminal Justice System: Current Features and Future Prospects' , Social Policy and Administration36(4): 392-407 .
13.
Gibbs, A. and D. King (forthcoming) `The Electronic Ball and Chain? The Operation and Impact of Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring in New Zealand' , Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology.
14.
Heggie, K. (1999) Review of the NSW Home Detention Scheme. NSW: Department of Corrective Services .
15.
Lilly, J.R. (1992) `Electronic Monitoring—Another Fatal Remedy', in C.A. Hartjen and E.E. Rhine (eds) Correctional Theory and Practice, pp. 97-115. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall .
16.
Lilly, J.R., R.A. Ball, G.D. Curry and J. McMullen (1993) `Electronic Monitoring of the Drunk Driver: A Seven-Year Study of the Home Confinement Alternative' , Crime and Delinquency39(4): 462-484 .
17.
Lilly, R. and M. Nellis (2001) `Home Detention Curfew and the Future of Electronic Monitoring' , Prison Service Journal May (135): 59-69 .
18.
Mair, G. and C. Nee (1990) Electronic Monitoring: The Trials and Their Results. Home Office Research Study No. 120. London: HMSO .
19.
Mortimer, E. (2001) Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: An Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. Research Findings No. 139. UK: Home Office .
20.
Mortimer, E. and G. Mair (1997) Curfew Orders with Electronic Monitoring: The First Twelve Months. Research Findings No. 51. UK: Home Office .
21.
Nellis, M. (2000) `Law and Order: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders', in D.P. Dolowitz (ed.) Policy Transfer and British Social Policy Learning from the USA?, pp. 98-130. Philadelphia, PA: OUP .
22.
Payne, B.K. and R.R. Gainey (1998) `A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring' , International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology42(2): 49-163 .
23.
Payne, B.K. and R.R. Gainey (2000) `Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systemic, and Political Issues' , Journal of Offender Rehabilitation31(3/4): 93-111 .
24.
Smith, D. (2001) `Electronic Monitoring of Offenders: The Scottish Experience' , Criminal Justice1(2): 201-214 .
25.
Spier, P. (2001) Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1991-2000. Wellington: Ministry of Justice .
26.
Stone, N. (2002) `A Practitioner's Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme' , Probation Journal49(2): 159-163 .
27.
Whitfield, D. (1997) Tackling the Tag: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press .
28.
Whitfield, D. (2001) The Magic Bracelet: Technology and Offender Supervision. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press .
