This article discusses some recent empirical research into the sentencing of dangerous offenders in England and Wales in its wider socio-legal context. It is particularly concerned to draw attention to the ways in which the operation of those procedural constraints that circumscribe judicial discretionary decisions in this area bear little relevance to notions of moral legitimacy, nor the legal rights of offenders, victims or the wider community.
Ashworth, A. (1983) Sentencing and Penal Policy. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
2.
Ashworth, A. (1989) `Criminal Justice and Deserved Sentences', Criminal Law Review: 340-55.
3.
Ashworth, A. (1996) `Proposals for Major Sentencing Changes', Criminal Law Review: 365.
4.
Ashworth, A. (1997) `Changes in Sentencing Law', Criminal Law Review: 1.
5.
Baker, E. (1993) `Dangerousness, Rights and Criminal Justice', Modern Law Review56: 528-47.
6.
Baker, E. and C.M.V. Clarkson (2002) `Making Punishments Work? An Evaluation of the Halliday Report on Sentencing in England and Wales', Criminal Law Review: 81-97.
7.
Becker, H. (1963) Outsiders, 2nd edn. New York: Free Press.
8.
Bottoms, A.E. (1977) `Reflections on the Renaissance of Dangerousness' , Howard Journal of Penology and Crime Prevention16: 70-98.
9.
Bottoms, A.E. (1995) `The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing', in C. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds) The Politics of Sentencing Reform, pp. 17-49. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
Bottoms, A.E. and R. Brownsword (1982) `The Dangerousness Debate after the Floud Report' , British Journal of Criminology22: 229-54.
11.
Brownlee, I. (1994) `Taking the Straight-Jacket off Persistence and the Distribution of Punishment in England and Wales', Legal Studies14: 294-312.
12.
Cavadino, M. and J. Dignan (2002) The Penal System: An Introduction, 3rd edn. London: Sage .
13.
Clarkson, C.M.V. (1996) `Beyond Just Deserts: Sentencing Violent and Sexual Offenders', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice36: 284-92.
14.
Cotterrell, R. (1998) `A Legal Concept of Community', Canadian Journal of Law and Society12: 75-91.
15.
Crocker, L. (1962) `The Upper Limit of Just Punishment', Emory Law Journal41: 1059-98.
16.
Dingwall, G. (1998) `Selective Incapacitation after the Criminal Justice Act 1991: A Proportional Response to Protecting the Public?', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice37: 177-87.
17.
Duff, R.A. and D. Garland (eds) (1994) A Reader on Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Edwards, I. (2001) `Victim Participation in Sentencing: The Problems of Incoherence', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice40: 39-54.
19.
Emmerson, B. and A. Ashworth (2001) Human Rights and Criminal Justice. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
20.
Flood-Page, C. and A. Mackie (1998) Sentencing Practice: An Examination of Decisions in Magistrates' Courts and the Crown Court in the Mid-1990s. Home Office Research Study No. 180. London: HMSO.
21.
Floud, J. and W. Young (1981) Dangerousness and Criminal Justice. London: Heinemann.
22.
Galligan, D.J. (1981) `Guidelines and Just Deserts: A Critique of Recent Trends in Sentencing Reform', Criminal Law Review: 297-311.
23.
Hazell's Guide (1995) Henley-on-Thames : R. Hazell & Co.
24.
Henham, R. (1994) `Attorney-General's References and Sentencing Policy' , Criminal Law Review: 499-512.
25.
Henham, R. (1995) `Cumulative Sentencing and Penal Policy', Journal of Criminal Law59: 420-30.
26.
Henham, R. (1996a) `Sentencing Policy, Appellate Guidance and Protective Sentencing', Journal of Criminal Law60: 424-46.
27.
Henham, R. (1996b) `Back to the Future on Sentencing: The 1996 White Paper', Modern Law Review59: 861-75.
28.
Henham, R. (1997a) `Dangerousness, Rationality and Sentencing Policy' , Anglo-American Law Review26: 493-525.
29.
Henham, R. (1997b) `Protective Sentences: Ethics, Rights and Sentencing Policy', International Journal of the Sociology of Law25: 45-63.
30.
Henham, R. (1997c) `Anglo-American Approaches to Cumulative Sentencing and the Implications for UK Sentencing Policy', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice36: 263-83.
31.
Henham, R. (1998) `Making Sense of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997' , Modern Law Review61: 223-35.
32.
Henham, R. (1999a) `Bargain Justice or Justice Denied?: Sentence Discounts and the Criminal Process', Modern Law Review62: 515-38.
33.
Henham, R. (1999b) `Theory, Rights and Sentencing Policy', International Journal of the Sociology of Law27: 253-76.
34.
Henham, R. (2000) `Sentencing Theory, Proportionality and Pragmatism' , International Journal of the Sociology of Law28: 239-63.
35.
Henham, R. (2001) `Sentencing Dangerous Offenders: Policy and Practice in the Crown Court', Criminal Law Review: 693-711.
36.
Henham, R. and M. Findlay (2000) `Theory and Methodology in the Comparative Contextual Analysis of Trial Process', unpublished working paper.
37.
Hogarth, J. (1971) Sentencing as a Human Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
38.
Home Office (1996) Protecting the Public: The Government's Strategy on Crime in England and Wales. Cm. 3190 . London: HMSO.
39.
Home Office/Department of Health (1999) Managing Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorder: Proposals for Policy Development. Available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk
40.
Home Office (2000) Reform of the Mental Health Act. London: HMSO.
41.
Home Office (2001) Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales (the `Halliday Report'). Available at http:/www.homeoffice.gov.uk/cpg/halliday.htm
42.
Home Office (2002) Justice for All. Cm. 5563. London: TSO.
43.
Hough, M. and J. Roberts (1999) `Sentencing Trends in Britain: Public Knowledge and Public Opinion', Punishment and Society1: 11-26.
44.
House of Commons, Select Committee on Home Affairs, First Report (2000) Managing Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorder. Available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p...900/cmselect/cmhealth/373/37311.htm.#a23
45.
Kamenka, E. (1979) `What Is Justice?', in E. Kamenka and A.E.-S. Tay (eds) Justice. London: Edward Arnold.
46.
Lacey, N. (1994) `Government as Manager, Citizen as Consumer: The Case of the Criminal Justice Act 1991', Modern Law Review57: 524-54.
47.
Lemon, N. (1974) `Training, Personality and Attitude as Determinants of Magistrates' Sentencing', British Journal of Criminology14: 34.
48.
Leng, R., R. Taylor and M. Wasik (1998) Blackstone's Guide to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. London: Blackstone Press.
49.
McAlinden, A.-M. (2001) `Indeterminate Sentences for the Severely Personality Disordered', Criminal Law Review: 108-23.
50.
Mathiesen, T. (1990) Prison on Trial. London: Sage.
51.
Murphy, J. (1979) Retribution, Justice and Therapy. Dordrecht: Reidel.
52.
Nash, M. (1992) `Dangerousness Revisited', International Journal of the Sociology of Law20: 337-49.
53.
Owens, M.W. (1995) `California's Three Strikes Law: Desperate Times Require Desperate Measures-But Will it Work?', Pacific Law Journal26: 881-919.
54.
Practice Direction: Custodial Sentences, 22 January 1998.
55.
Pratt, J. (1995) `Dangerousness, Risk and Technologies of Power' , Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology28: 3-31.
56.
Pratt, J. (1996) `Governing the Dangerous: An Historical Overview of Dangerous Offender Legislation', Social & Legal Studies5: 21-36.
57.
Radzinowicz, L. and R. Hood (1978) `A Dangerous Direction for Sentencing Reform', Criminal Law Review: 713-24.
58.
Radzinowicz, L. and R. Hood (1981) `Dangerousness and Criminal Justice: A Few Reflections' , Criminal Law Review: 756-61.
59.
Ragin, C.C. and H.S. Becker (eds) (1992) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Rychlak, R.J. (1990) `Society's Moral Right to Punish: A Further Exploration of the Denunciation Theory of Punishment', Tulane Law Review65: 299-338.
61.
Sentencing Advisory Panel (2001) The Use of Extended Sentences: Consultation Paper. Available at http://www.sentencing-advisory-panel.gov.uk/exsent.htm
62.
Shichor, D. and D.K. Sechrest (eds) (1996) Three Strikes and You're Out . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Shute, S. (1998) `The Place of Public Opinion in Sentencing Law' , Criminal Law Review: 465-77.
64.
Stake, R.E. (1994) `Case Studies', in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
Thomas D.A. (1996a) `Commentary on White', Criminal Law Review: 132.
66.
Thomas, D.A. (1996b) `The White Paper', Sentencing News2: 6-11.
Thomas, D.A. (1999c) `Commentary on Kelly', Criminal Law Review: 242.
74.
Thomas, D.A. (1999d) `Commentary on Chapman', Criminal Law Review: 854.
75.
Thomas, D.A. (2000) `Commentary on de Silva', Criminal Law Review: 504. Von Hirsch, A. (1985) Past or Future Crimes. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
76.
Von Hirsch, A. (1986) `Deservedness and Dangerousness in Sentencing Policy' , Criminal Law Review: 79-91.
77.
Von Hirsch, A. (1988) `Selective Incapacitation Re-examined', Criminal Justice Ethics7: 19.
78.
Von Hirsch, A. and A. Ashworth (1996) `Protective Sentencing under Section 2(2)(b): The Criteria for Dangerousness', Criminal Law Review: 175-83.
79.
Walker, N. (1985) Sentencing Theory, Law and Practice, 1st edn. London: Butterworths .
80.
Walker, N. (ed.) (1996) Dangerous People. London: Blackstone Press .
81.
Walker, N. (1997) `Harms, Probabilities and Precautions', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies17: 611-20.
82.
Walker, N. (1999) Aggravation, Mitigation and Mercy in English Criminal Justice. London: Blackstone Press .
83.
Walker, N. and M. Hough (eds) (1988) Public Attitudes to Sentencing: Surveys in Five Counties. Aldershot: Gower.
84.
Wasik, M. (2001) Emmins on Sentencing. London : Blackstone Press.
85.
Wasik, M. and A. von Hirsch (1990) `Statutory Sentencing Principles: The 1990 White Paper', Modern Law Review53: 508-17.
86.
Windlesham, Lord (1996) Responses to Crime, vol. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87.
Wood, D. (1988) `Dangerous Offenders and the Morality of Protective Sentencing', Criminal Law Review: 424-33.
88.
Yin, R.K. (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury, CA: Sage.
