How "Catch 20" traps the deaf workers. The Observer, 9 Dec. 1979; 1.
2.
H.M.S.O.The Health and Safety at Work Act1974.
3.
Spoor, A.Presbycusis values in relation to noise induced hearing loss. Int. Audiol., 6, 52, 1967
4.
Hinchcliffe, R.Population studies concerned with presbycusis . Ind. J. Otolaryng., 20, 52, 1968
5.
Carhart, R.Speech reception in relation to pattern of pure tone loss. J. Speech Disorders, 11, 97-108, 1946.
6.
Harris, J.D. , Haines, H.L. and Myers, C.K.A new formula for using the audiogram to predict speech hearing loss. Arch. Otolaryng, 63, 158-176, 1956.
7.
Quiggle, R.R. , Glorig, A., Delk , J.H. and Summerfield , A.B.Predicting hearing loss of speech from pure tone audiograms. Laryngoscope , 67, 1-15, 1957.
8.
Kryter, K.D.Williams, C. and Green, D.M.Auditory acuity and the perception of speech . JASA, 34, 1217-1223,m 1962 .
9.
Suter, A.H.The ability of mildly hearing impaired individuals to discriminate speech in noise. Joint EPA/USAF study EPA 550/9-78-100 AMRL-TR-78-4Washington DC. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . Jan. 1978.
10.
Aniansson, G.Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in everyday listening situations. Acta. Otol. Suppl. , 320, 1974.
11.
" Harris, J.D.Combinations of distortion in speech. The 25 per cent safety factor by multiple-cueing . Arch. Otolaryngol., 72, 227-232, 1960.
12.
Harris, J.D. , Haines, H.L. and Myers, C.K.The importance of hearing at 3 kHz for understanding speeded speech. Laryngoscope , 70, 131-146, 1960.
13.
Harris, J.D.Pure tone acuity and the intelligibility of everyday speech. JASA, 37, 824-830, 1965.
14.
Iec R.178. Pure tone screening audiometers. International Organisation for Standardisation , 1, Rue de Varembé, Geneva, Switzerland.
15.
Ansi S.3.6- 1969. Specification for audiometers. American National Standards Institute, 1430, Broadway, New York NY 10018.