Since 2009, rural China has gradually developed a new livelihood model in which families produce goods in small home-based workshops and sell them via online stores on e-commerce platforms. This article explores how rural e-commerce merchants in Daiji Town engage with platform recommendation algorithms to promote “Baokuan” (explosively popular products) for high sales. In this process, rural networks, local entrepreneurial cultures, and informal theories of algorithmic behavior are mobilized in collective attempts to manipulate digital visibility and platform rankings. Drawing on the conceptual framework of algorithmic imaginaries and folk theories, I argue that algorithmic capitalism’s extraction over digital laborers in e-commerce villages is sustained through cultivating sellers’ algorithmic imaginaries that they can manipulate algorithmic outcomes with their knowledge of e-commerce operation. It drives sellers to constantly invest labor, capital, and attention in platform-defined success metrics, reinforcing their dependency on opaque algorithmic logics and deepening their dispossession within the digital economy.
AiroldiM (2022) Machine Habitus: Toward a Sociology of Algorithms. Cambridge, Medford, MA: Polity Press.
2.
AndersenJ (2020) Understanding and interpreting algorithms: toward a hermeneutics of algorithms. Media, Culture & Society42(7–8): 1479–1494.
3.
BeerD (2009) Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society11(6): 985–1002.
4.
BravermanH (1975) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
5.
BucherT (2017) The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society20(1): 30–44.
6.
BurrellJ (2016) How the machine “thinks”: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society3(1): 2053951715622512.
7.
BurrellJFourcadeM (2021) The society of algorithms. Annual Review of Sociology47(1): 213–237.
8.
ChenZBarcusHR (2024) The rise of home-returning women’s entrepreneurship in China’s rural development: producing the enterprising self through empowerment, cooperation, and networking. Journal of Rural Studies105: 103156.
9.
CoutureVFaberBGuY, et al. (2021) Connecting the countryside via E-Commerce: evidence from China. The American Economic Review: Insights3(1): 35–50.
10.
DeVitoMA (2018) How people form folk theories of social media feeds and what it means for how we study self-presentation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC Canada, 21–26 April 2018, pp. 1–12. ACM.
11.
DongSWangNFanC, et al. (2024) E-commerce and rural women entrepreneurship ——based on the quasi-natural experiment of “comprehensive demonstration policy” for E-commerce in rural areas. Economic Analysis and Policy83: 749–765.
JinHLiLQianX, et al. (2020) Can rural e-commerce service centers improve farmers’ subject well-being? A new practice of “internet plus rural public services” from China. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review23(5): 681–696.
14.
KararH (2019) Algorithmic capitalism and the digital divide in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Developing Societies35(4): 514–537.
15.
KarizatNDelmonacoDEslamiM, et al. (2021) Algorithmic folk theories and identity: how TikTok users Co-Produce knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5(CSCW2): 1–44.
16.
KooWWEesleyCE (2021) Platform governance and the rural–urban divide: sellers’ responses to design change. Strategic Management Journal42(5): 941–967.
17.
LiGQinJ (2022) Income effect of rural E-commerce: empirical evidence from taobao villages in China. Journal of Rural Studies96: 129–140.
18.
LinGXieXLvZ (2016) Taobao practices, everyday life and emerging hybrid rurality in contemporary China. Journal of Rural Studies47: 514–523.
MittelmanJH (2022) The power of algorithmic capitalism. International Critical Thought12(3): 448–469.
21.
Nelson-FieldK (2020) The Attention Economy and How Media Works: Simple Truths for Marketers. Singapore: Springer Singapore Pte. Limited.
22.
PetersMA (2017) Algorithmic capitalism in the epoch of digital reason. Fast Capitalism14(1): 65–74.
23.
PosterWR (2013) Hidden sides of the credit economy: emotions, outsourcing, and Indian call centers. International Journal of Comparative Sociology54(3): 205–227.
24.
RosenblatAStarkL (2016) Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2686227. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
25.
SchulzC (2023) A new algorithmic imaginary. Media, Culture & Society45(3): 646–655.
26.
SilesISegura-CastilloASolísR, et al. (2020) Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on spotify: enacting data assemblages in the global south. Big Data & Society7(1): 205395172092337.
VallasSSchorJB (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology46(1): 273–294.
29.
van DoornN (2017) Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 898–914.
30.
YangX (2021) The era of baokuan films: how Chinese social media creates box office successes. Journal of Chinese Cinemas15(1): 104–120.
31.
Ytre-ArneBMoeH (2021) Folk theories of algorithms: understanding digital irritation. Media, Culture & Society43(5): 807–824.
