In this paper I recount my relationship with the ex-surrogate Swapna during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how it comes to define my navigation of my immobility due to the lockdown. Juxtaposed with my immobility is Swapna’s forced mobility to stay afloat due to a precarious economic situation. Firmly embedded within ‘reprography’, or the reworking of the traditional ethnography through the ‘undoing’ of the ‘field’, and fieldwork-related mobility this paper is about contradictory subject positions and the reduction of women into mere reproductive beings—to challenge the same. In the process, I suggest that COVID-19 has brought to the fore how reproductive labour continues to be modelled on the endemic precarity that commercial surrogacy engenders in hiring poor Indian women as gestates. This precarity becomes further exacerbated during the pandemic, thereby creating conditions for ‘risky living’ for out-of-work surrogates.
AmrithMJohnsonJMartinD, et al. (2008/09) Harvesting failure in the field: an ethnographic apprenticeship in coping with the unexpected. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology28(1): 61–82.
4.
BailliardALAldrichRMDickieVA (2012) Ethnography and the transactional study of occupation. In: CutchinMPDickieVA (eds) Transactional Perspectives on Occupation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 157–168.
5.
BanerjeeSKotiswaranP (2021) Divine labours, devalued work: The continuing saga of India’s surrogacy regulation. Indian Law Review5(1): 85–105.
6.
BarataCNevesDMSantosJDSM (2020). COVID-19 Containment Measures, Perinatal Experiences, and the Fight for Childbirth Rights in Portugal. Medical Anthropology Quarterly Rapid Response Blog Series, AccessedOctober 13, 2025http://medanthroquarterly.org/?p=534
7.
BarriosRE (2017) What does catastrophe reveal for whom? The anthropology of crises and disasters at the onset of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Anthropology46(1): 151–166.
8.
BeattyA (2010) How did it feel for you? Emotion, narrative, and the limits of ethnography. American Anthropologist112(3): 430–443.
9.
BerendZ (2016) The Online World of Surrogacy. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
10.
BirukC (2017) Ethical gifts?: an analysis of soap-for-data transactions in Malawian survey research worlds. Medical Anthropology Quarterly31(3): 365–384.
11.
BoellstorffT (2015) Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, PA: Princeton University Press.
12.
BuhlerN (2021) When reproduction meets ageing: The science and medicine of the fertility decline. London: Emerald.
13.
CliffordJMarcusGE (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.
14.
ConstableN (2003) Romance on a Global Stage: Pen Pals, Virtual Ethnography, and ‘Mail Order’ Marriages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
CooperMWaldbyC (2014) Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
CrapanzanoV (1980) Tuhami: The Portrait of a Moroccan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
DeomampoD (2013) Transnational surrogacy in India: Interrogating power and women’s agency. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies34(3): 167–188.
18.
GuerzoniCSmietanaM (forthcoming) Contemporary (Repro)graphies: reflecting on methodologies through the lens of the anthropology of reproduction.
19.
GunelGWatanabeC (2024) Patchwork ethnography. American Ethnologist51: 131–139.
HochschildA (2011) Emotional life on the market frontier. Annual Review of Sociology37: 21–33.
22.
Hordge-FreemanE (2018) “Bringing your whole self to research”: the power of the researcher’s body, emotions and identities in ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods17: 1–9.
23.
InhornMC (2015) Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
InhornMCBirenbaum-CarmeliD (2008) Assisted reproductive technologies and culture change. Annual Review of Anthropology37: 177–196.
25.
InhornMCGürtinZB (2011) Cross-border reproductive care: a future research agenda. Reproductive Biomedicine Online23(5): 665–676.
26.
JacobsonH (2016) Labor of Love: Gestational Surrogacy and the Work of Making Babies. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
27.
JacobsonHKönigAMajumdarA (2023) Im/mobility in the transnational surrogacy market: disruptions and vulnerabilities in and beyond pandemic times. Applied Mobilities9(4): 301–317.
28.
KönigAJacobsonH (2023) Reprowebs: a conceptual approach to elasticity and change in the global assisted reproduction industry. BioSocieties18(1): 174–196.
29.
KuiperG (2021) Emotional risk assessments in the field: leaving Tanzania during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ethnography26(1): 106–125.
30.
KumarN (1992) Friends, Brothers and Informants: Fieldwork Memoirs of Banaras. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
LevineHB (2003) Gestational surrogacy: nature and culture in kinship. Ethnology42: 173–185.
32.
MajumdarA (2018) Conceptualizing surrogacy as work-labour: domestic labour in commercial gestational surrogacy in India. Journal of South Asian Development13(2): 210–227.
33.
Mavhandu-MudzusiAHMoyoIMthombeniA, et al. (2022) WhatsApp as a qualitative data collection method in descriptive phenomenological studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods21: 16094069221111124.
NadimpallySMajumdarA (2017) Recruiting to give birth: Agent-facilitators and the commercial surrogacy arrangement in India. In: DaviesM (ed) Babies for Sale? Transnational Surrogacy, Human Rights and the Politics of Reproduction. UK: Zed Books.
ParryJBlochM (eds) (1989) Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
PerkinsJ (2023) 'You have to do some dhora-dhori': Achieving medical maternal health expectations through trust as social practice in Bangladesh. Journal of the British Academy, 11: 31-48.
45.
RajkhowaPQaimM (2022) Mobile phones, women's physical mobility, and contraceptive use in India. Social Science & Medicine (1982)305: 115074.
46.
RayRQayumS (2009) Cultures of Servitude: Modernity, Domesticity, and Class in India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
RosaldoR (1989) Grief and a headhunter's rageCulture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 1–21.
48.
RudrappaS (2015) Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: NYU press.
49.
SahaD (2020) Women struggle to access safe maternal care in the world's harshest lockdown. Medical Anthropology Quaterly Rapid Response Blog Series, AccessedOctober 13, 2025, http://medanthroquarterly.org/?p=530
50.
Sama Resource Group for Women and Health (2012) Regulation of Surrogacy in Indian Context. New Delhi: SAMA.
SaravananS (2010) Transnational surrogacy and objectification of gestational mothers. Economic and Political Weekly45: 26–29.
53.
SmietanaM (2018) Procreative consciousness in a global market: gay men's paths to surrogacy in the USA. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online7: 101–111.
54.
StaudacherSKaiser-GrolimundA (2016) Whatsapp in ethnographic research: methodological reflections on new edges of the field. In: ChappatteAKaiser-GrolimundAStaudacherS (eds) Mobilities: In and Out of Africa. Basel Papers on Political Transformations. Basel: University of Basel.
WeisC (2021) Surrogacy in Russia. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Ltd.
61.
WhittakerAGerritsTWeisC (2022) Emerging “repronubs” and “repropreneurs”: transnational surrogacy in Ghana, Kazakhstan, and Laos. International Journal of Comparative Sociology63(5-6): 304–323.
