This article aims to interrogate the construction of normality with a view to a squatter metropolitan setting in İzmir, Turkey. In doing so, I focus on the everyday experiences of the inhabitants in Limontepe and frame them in the context of place-making. I read the concept of ‘normal’ through Bourdieu’s notion of habitus and refer to women’s micro-practices in drawing its contours. Women, living within the boundaries of normality use tactics to cope with the existing normal and related interventions to their bodies, movements, and thoughts. Ethnographic research is the key to understanding inhabitants’ gendered experiences with space.
Bektaş AtaL (2021) Limontepe'de Yaşamak, Büyümek, Beklemek: Kentsel Dönüşüm Öncesi Bir Mahalle Anlatısı. Ankara: İdealkent.
7.
Bektaş AtaL (2022) Gecekonduyu kente katmak: Kadın anlatılarında hareketlilik. Kadın/Woman 2000, Journal for Women's Studies23(2): 69–88.
8.
BotermanWBridgeG (2015) Gender, class and space in the field of parenthood comparing middle-class fractions in Amsterdam and London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers40: 249–261.
9.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.
10.
BourdieuP (2002) Habitus. In: HillierJRooksbyE (eds), Habitus: A Sense of Place. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 43–52.
11.
BourdieuP (2013) Outline of a Theory and Practice Translated by Richard Nice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BourdieuPWacquantLJD (1992) The purpose of reflexive sociology (The Chicago Workshop). In: BourdieuPWacquantLJD (eds), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 61–216.
13.
BridgeG (2011) Pierre Bourdieu. In: HubbardPKitchinR (eds), Key Thinkers on Space and Place. SAGE, pp. 76–81.
14.
ConnellR (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Oxford: Polity Press.
15.
CresswellT (1996) Place/out of Place: Geography, Ideology, and Transgression. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
De CerteauM (1988) The Practice of Everyday Life Translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
ErmanT (2001) The politics of squatter (gecekondu) studies in Turkey: The changing representations of rural migrants in the academic discourse. Urban Studies38(7): 983–1002.
18.
ErderS (2015) İstanbul Bir Kervansaray mı? Göç Yazıları. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi University Press.
19.
FregaE (2015) The normative structure of the ordinary. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], VII-1. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.370
20.
FyfeNR (1998) Introduction: Reading the street. In: FyfeNR (ed), Images of the Street: Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–11.
21.
GansHJ (1962) The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian – Americans. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
22.
HighmoreB (2011) Ordinary Lives: Studies in the Everyday. Oxon: Routledge.
23.
HillierJRooksbyE (2002) Introduction. In: HillierJRooksbyE (eds), Habitus: A Sense of Place. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 3–26.
24.
LeeJIngoldT (2006) Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing. In: ColemanSCollinsP (eds), Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 67–86.
25.
LefebvreH (2002) Critique of Everyday Life (Volume II): Foundations for Sociology of the Everyday Life Translated by John Moore. London and New York: Verso.
26.
LowSTaplinDScheldS (2005) Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
27.
LowS (2017) Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. London and New York: Routledge.
28.
MadanipourA (2003) Public and Private Spaces of the City. London and New York: Routledge.
29.
ParkRE (1975) The urban community as a spatial pattern and moral order. In: PeachC (ed), Urban Social Segregation. London: Longman, pp. 21–30.
30.
SavageM (2011) The lost urban sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. In: BridgeGWatsonS (eds), The New Blackwell: Companion to the City. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 511–520.
31.
SchneeklothLHShibleyRG (1995) Placemaking: The Art and Practice of Building Communities. New York: Wiley.
32.
SkeggsB (2005) Context and background: Pierre Bourdieu’s analysis of class, gender and sexuality. In: AdkinsLSkeggsB (eds), Feminism After Bourdieu. New Jersey: Blackwell, pp. 19–34.
33.
SuttlesGD (1968) The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
TolanB (1991) Aile, Cinsiyet ve Cinsel Roller. Türk Aile Ansiklopedisi. Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu.
35.
VatandaşC (2007) Toplumsal cinsiyet ve cinsiyet rollerinin algılanışı. Sosyoloji Konferansları Dergisi35: 29–56.
36.
WacquantLJD (1992) Toward a social praxeology: The structure and logic of Bourdieu's sociology. In: BourdieuPWacquantLJD (eds), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–60.
37.
WedelH (2013) Siyaset ve Cinsiyet: İstanbul Gecekondularında Kadınların Siyasal Katılımı. Translated by Can Kurultay. İstanbul: Metis.
38.
WolfDL (2009) Saha çalışmasında feminist ikilemler. In: HattatoğluDErtuğrulG (eds), Methodos: Kuram ve Yöntem Kenarından. İstanbul: Anahtar Kitaplar, pp. 372–442.
