This article is an ethnographic study of a sakan shababiyy––a non-familial domestic space shared by young Syrian men living in exile. Based on fieldwork carried out in Lebanon between 2017 and early 2020, the article describes the texture of everyday life in a space where young men attempt to make home together in exile amidst the escalating pressures of housing discrimination, political repression, and economic collapse. The narration critically engages Bourdieu’s famous analysis of the Kabyle house as a frame for considering the ambiguous ‘reversals and reflections’ that structure domestic space in the aftermath of war and displacement. As a group of formerly middle-class young men rebuild lives upended by violence, peer cohabitation produces a masculine domesticity that is both an improvised and creative response to the exigences of exile and the grounds for orienting towards more optimistic imagined futures.
AbourahmeN (2015) Assembling and spilling-over: towards an ‘ethnography of cement’ in a palestinian refugee camp. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39(2): 200–217.
2.
Abu-LughodL (1989) Zones of theory in the anthropology of the Arab world. Annual Review of Anthropology18: 267–306.
3.
AgierM (2011) Managing the Undesirables. London: Polity.
AllanD (2013) Refugees of the Revolution: Experiences of Palestinian Exile. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
BourdieuP (1970) The berber house or the world reversed. Social Science Information9(2): 151–170.
7.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
9.
BourdieuPSayadA (2020) Uprooting: The Crisis of Traditional Agriculture in Algeria. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
BrunCFábosA (2015) Making homes in Limbo? A conceptual framework. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees31(1): 5–17.
11.
ChalcraftJ (2009) The Invisible Cage: Syrian Migrant Workers in Lebanon. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
DingerS (2021) “Dispossessing the Displaced in Lebanon”. Contexts20(1): 15–20.
13.
FawazM (2017) Planning and the refugee crisis: informality as a framework of analysis and reflection. Planning Theory16(1): 99–115.
14.
FawazMSalaméDSerhanI (2018) Seeing the city as a delivery driver. In FawazM, et al. (eds) Refugees as City-Makers. Beirut, Lebanon: Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs, 60–81.
15.
FeldmanI (2007) Difficult distinctions: refugee law, humanitarian practice, and political identification in Gaza. Cultural Anthropology22(1): 129–169.
16.
GhannamF (2013) Live and Die like a Man: Gender Dynamics in Urban Egypt. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
17.
HageG (2009) Waiting Out the Crisis: On Stuckedness and Governmentality. In: HageG (ed) Waiting. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing, 97–106.
18.
HageG (2012) Critical anthropological thought and the radical political imaginary today. Critique of Anthropology32(3): 285–308.
19.
HolzerE (2015) The Concerned Women of Buduburam: Refugee Activists and Humanitarian Dilemmas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
InhornM (2012) The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
JosephS (1997) The public/private: the imagined boundary in the imagined nation/state/community: the Lebanese case. Feminist Review57: 73–92.
22.
KanafaniSSawafZ (2017) Being, doing and knowing in the field: reflections on ethnographic practice in the Arab region. Contemporary Levant2(1): 3–11.
23.
KandiyotiD (1988) Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society2(3): 274–290.
24.
LipstadtH (2003) To see, to record, to photograph: discovering Pierre Bourdieu’s rediscovered photographs of the Berber house, uncovering architecture as an intellectualist art. Thresholds27(27): 12–17.
25.
MalkkiL (1995) Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology Among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
MonroeK (2020) Masculinity, migration, and forced conscription in the Syrian war. Cultural Anthropology35(2): 264–289.
27.
ProudfootP (2022) Rebel Populism: Revolution and Loss Among Syrian Labourers in Beirut. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
28.
SchielkeS (2020) Migrant Dreams: Egyptian Workers in the Gulf States. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.
29.
ShamsT (2020) Here, There, and Elsewhere: The Making of Immigrant Identities in a Globalized World. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
30.
SilversteinP (2004) Of rooting and uprooting: Kabyle habitus, domesticity, and structural Nostalgia. Ethnography5(4): 553–578.
31.
StavinohaLRamakrishnanK (2020) Beyond humanitarian logics: volunteer-refugee encounters in Chios and Paris. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development11(2): 165–186.
32.
SuerbaumM (2018a) Becoming and ‘unbecoming’ refugees: making sense of masculinity and refugeness among Syrian Refugee men in Egypt. Men and Masculinities21(3): 363–382.
33.
SuerbaumM (2018b) Defining the other to masculinize oneself: Syrian men’s negotiations of masculinity during displacement in Egypt. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society43(3): 665–686.
34.
StrandMLizardoO (2017) The hysteresis effect: theorizing mismatch in action. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour47(2): 164–194.
