Each year the United States government detains and deports hundreds of thousands of people who prior to their removal are held in confinement for an average of 55 days. The short and long-term effects of the coronavirus pandemic on migrant detention and deportation continue to be evaluated in real time, including how we can best study it. This paper provides a timely analysis on the relationship between immigration enforcement and confinement, public health emergencies, and ethnographic methods. It makes two contributions. The first is methodological and focuses on the challenges and opportunities of ethnographic methods in carceral settings when pandemic-related protocols have raised additional challenges to conventional in-person prison ethnography. The second contribution is empirical and documents how we adapted ethnographic methods to an interdisciplinary research design and to the exigencies of the pandemic to study the spread of the coronavirus in four immigrant detention facilities in New Jersey, USA.
BanerjeeAKatsoulisMLaiAG, et al. (2020) Clinical academic research in the time of corona: a simulation study in England and a call for action. Plos One15(8): e0237298. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237298
3.
BarakMPLeónKSMaguireER (2020) Conceptual and empirical obstacles in defining MS‐13. Criminology & Public Policy19(2): 563–589. DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12493
4.
BellKWynnL (2020) Research ethics committees, ethnographers and imaginations of risk. Ethnography DOI: 10.1177/1466138120983862
5.
BergUD (2021) The afterlife of U.S. disciplining institutions: transnational structures of (Im)mobility among peruvian deportees. In: RúaRamos-Zayas (eds), Critical Dialogues in Latinx Studies. New York and London: New York University Press, pp. 392–403.
6.
BoeCS (2020) Institutions of confinement as sites of passage. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology38(1): 70–87.
7.
BoellstorffTNardiBPearceC, et al. (2012) Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
BosworthMKelleziB (2017) Doing research in immigration removal centres: ethics, emotions and impact. Criminology & Criminal Justice17(2): 121–137.
9.
BosworthMKelleziB (2016) Getting in, getting out and getting back: conducting long-term research in immigration detention centres. In: ArmstrongSBlausteinJHenryA (eds), Reflexivity and Criminal Justice: Intersections of Policy, Practice and Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 237–262. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_11
10.
BoyerDMarcusGE (2021) Introduction. In: BoyerDMarcusGE (eds), Collaborative Anthropology Today: A Collection of Exceptions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
BrooksIBestA (2021) Prison fixes and flows: carceral mobilities and their critical logistics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space39(3): 459–476.
12.
BrownMScheptJ (2017) New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies. Punishment & Society19(4): 440–462. DOI: 10.1177/1462474516666281
ConlonDHiemstraN (2017) Mobility and materialisation of the carceral: examining immigration and immigration detention. In: TurnerJPetersK (eds), Carceral Mobilities: Interrogating Movement in Incarceration. London and New York: Routledge.
15.
CoutinSB (2003) Suspension of deportation hearings and measures of “Americanness”. Journal of Latin American Anthropology8(2): 58–94.
16.
CunhaM (2014) The ethnography of prisons and penal confinement. Annual Review of Anthropology43: 217–233.
17.
DavisD-ACravenC (2016) Feminist Ethnography: Thinking through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
18.
DeHartM (2020) Thinking Ethnographically in Pandemic Times. New York: Social Science Research Council. Retrieved 3 May 2020.
19.
DehghanR (2020) Love in the time of corona. British Journal of General Practice70(695): 292. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X710177
DomenechE (2020) La “política de la hostilidad” en argentina: detención, expulsión y rechazo en frontera. Estudios Fronterizos21: e057. DOI: 10.21670/ref.2015057
23.
DrakeDHEarleRSloanJ (2015) General introduction: what ethnography tells us about prisons and what prisons tell us about ethnography. In: The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–16.
24.
EllisR (2021) Prisons as porous institutions. Theory and Society50: 175–199. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-020-09426-w
25.
EspositoF (2017) Practicing ethnography in migration-related detention centers: a reflexive account. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community45(1): 57–69.
26.
FassinD (2017) Prison Worlds: An Ethnography of the Carceral Condition. Cambridge ; Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
FisherM (2021) Charting the future of business and organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography,10(3): 369–380. Emerald Publishing. (Fall 2021).
29.
GillN (2009) Governmental mobility: the power effects of the movement of detained asylum seekers around Britain’s detention estate. Political Geography28(3): 186–196.
30.
GillNConlonDMoranD, et al. (2018) Carceral circuitry. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 183–204.
HammersleyM (2015) Research ‘inside’ viewed from ‘outside’: reflections on prison ethnography. In: DrakeDHEarleRSloanJ (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–39.
34.
HasselbergI (2016) Enduring Uncertainty: Deportation, Punishment and Everyday Life. London: Berghahn Books.
HiemstraN (2019) Detain and Deport: The Chaotic US immigration Enforcement Regime. Athens: University of Georgia Press, Vol. 43.
37.
Human Rights First (1918) Ailing Justice: New Jersey Inadequate Healthcare, Indifference, and Indefinite Confinement in Immigration Detention. Washington DC: Human Rights First. Retrieved May 28, 2020.
38.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) (2020) ICE Guidance on COVID-19. Retrieved August 24, 2020: https://www.ice.gov/coronavirus
IrvineMCoombsDSkarhaJ, et al. (2020) Modeling COVID-19 and its impacts on U.S. immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) detention facilities, 2020. Journal of Urban Health97(4): 439–447. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-020-00441-x
KäihköI (2020a) Covid-19, Ebola, and the Ethnographic Distance. New York: Social Science Research Council. Accessed on 10 August 2020.
47.
KäihköI (2020b) Conflict chatnography: instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography21(1): 71–91.
48.
KönönenJ (2019) The waiting game: immigration detention as the waiting room of immigration law. Migration Studies9(3): 721–739. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnz036
49.
KönönenJ (2021) The absent presence of the deportation apparatus: methodological challenges in the production of knowledge on immigration detention. Social Anthropology29(3): 619–634.
50.
KozinetsRV (2010) Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage publications.
51.
KuiperG (2021) Emotional Risk Assessments in the Field: Leaving Tanzania during the COVID-19 pandemicEthnography. Online First. DOI: 10.1177/14661381211002856
52.
LondonAJKimmelmanJ (2020) Against pandemic research exceptionalism. Science368(6490): 476–477. DOI: 10.1126/science.abc1731
53.
MailletPMountzAWilliamsK (2017) Researching migration and enforcement in obscured places: practical, ethical and methodological challenges to fieldwork. Social & Cultural Geography18(7): 927–950.
54.
MarquezBAMarquez-VelardeGEasonJM, et al. (2021) Pushing them to the edge: suicide in immigrant detention centers as a product of organizational failure. Social Science & Medicine283: 114–177.
MbembeA (2003) Necropolitics. Public Culture15(1): 11–40.
57.
MeadMMétrauxR (eds), (2020) The Study of Culture at a Distance. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, Vol.1.
58.
MetznerJLFellnerJ (2010) Solitary confinement and mental illness in U.S. prisons: a challenge for medical ethics. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law38(1): 104–108. http://jaapl.org/content/38/1/104
59.
Montoya-GalvezC (2020) Exporting the Virus: Migrants Deported by U.S. Make up 20% of Guatemala's Coronavirus Cases. CBS News. Retrieved 2 May 2020.
60.
MountzACoddingtonKCataniaRT, et al. (2013) Conceptualizing detention. Progress in Human Geography37(4): 522–541.
61.
MusanteKDeWaltBR (2010) Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Lanham, New York, Toronto, and Plymouth, UK: Rowman Altamira.
62.
NasproRDa PozzoLF (2020) Urology in the time of corona. Nature Reviews. Urology17(5): 251–253. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-0312-1
PattersonTC (2001) A Social History of Anthropology in the United States. London and New York: Routledge.
67.
PinkS (2016) Digital ethnography. In: KubitschkoSKaunA (eds), Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–165.
68.
PodjedD (2021) Renewal of ethnography in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Sociologija i prostor/Sociology & Space59(1): 267–284.
69.
PostillJ (2017) Remote ethnography: studying culture from afar. In: HjorthLHorstHGallowayA, et al. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. London: Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781315673974
70.
ProvineDMVarsanyiMWLewisPG, et al. (2016) Policing Immigrants: Local Law Enforcement on the Front Lines. Chicago, Ill, London: University of Chicago Press.
RhodesLA (2015) Ethnographic imagination in the field of the prison. In: DrakeDHEarleRSloanJ (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 271–283.
74.
RosasGRaymondV (2020) Migrant detention turns deadlier. NACLA Report on the Americas52(3): 289–295.
75.
ShilatifardA (2020) Medicine in the time of corona: fundamental molecular research is “essential”. Science Advances6(23): eabc2800. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2800
76.
ShumarWMadisonN (2013) Ethnography in a virtual world. Ethnography and Education8(2): 255–272. DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2013.792513
77.
SieffKMiroffN (2020) U.S. Is Deporting Infected Migrants Back to Vulnerable Countries”: Washington Post, April 21.
SmetsMBurkeGJarzabkowskiP, et al. (2014) Charting new territory for organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography3(1): 10–26.
80.
ToshSRBergUDLeónKS (2021) Migrant Detention and COVID-19: pandemic responses in four new jersey detention centers. Journal on Migration and Human Security9(1): 44–62.
81.
TRAC (2021) Immigration detention numbers fall under biden, but border book-ins rise. syracuse, NY: transactional records access clearinghouse. Retrieved 10 June 2021: https://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/640/#f2
82.
TurnbullS (2018) Making sense of the shifting ‘field’. In: FiliAJahnsenSPowellR (eds), Criminal Justice Research in an Era of Mass Mobility. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 130–143.
83.
TurnerJPetersK (2016) Rethinking mobility in criminology: beyond horizontal mobilities of prisoner transportation. Punishment & Society19(1): 96–114.
84.
WacquantL (2002) The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography3(4): 371–397.
85.
WeegelsJJeffersonAMMartinTM (2020) Introduction. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology38(1): 1–14.
86.
WilsonSMPetersonLC (2002) The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology31: 449–467. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436
