Feminist methodological interventions have advanced our understanding of reflexivities, leading us to question our own positions and intersections in relation to the field and those we study. More recent methodological contributions from queer authors add notions of fluid researcher identities and researcher erotics to reflexivities. However, such interventions frame reflexivity as a research practice applied to the research process or occurrences in the field. This article argues for a continuous, although never complete, use of reflexivity that addresses the researcher’s personal desires and orientations—there before the research started—that can influence what topics we study, the questions we ask, the methods and sites we choose, how we interact with others in the field, and our analyses. I use ethnographic data on gay and queer spaces in Boston, Massachusetts, and Providence, Rhode Island, to demonstrate the utility of this reflexivity, especially for sex research.
AdamsTEJonesSH (2011) Telling stories: Reflexivity, queer theory, and autoethnography. Cultural Studies ←→ Critical Methodologies11(2): 108–116.
2.
AhmedS (2006) Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
AhmedS (2017) Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
AlcoffL (1988) Cultural feminism versus poststructuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs13(3): 405–436.
5.
BartonB (2012) Pray the Gay Away: The Extraordinary Lives of Bible Belt Gays. New York: New York University Press.
6.
BernsteinE (2001) The meaning of the purchase: Desire, demand and the commerce of sex. Ethnography2(3): 389–420.
7.
Brown-SaracinoJ (2009) A Neighborhood that Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation, and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Brown-SaracinoJ (2018) How Places Make Us: Novel LBQ Identities in Four Small Cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BrowneKBakshiLLawA (2010) Positionalities: It’s not about them and us, it’s about us. In: SmithSJPainRMarstonSA, et al (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Social Geographies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp. 586–605.
10.
BrowneKNashCJ (2010) Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
11.
CarrilloH (2017) Pathways of Desire: The Sexual Migration of Mexican Gay Men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
CatungalJP (2017) Feeling bodies of knowledge: situating knowledge production through felt embeddedness. Journal of Economic and Human Geography108(3): 289–301.
13.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
ComptonDMeadowTSchiltK (2018) Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
16.
ConnellC (2018) Thank you for coming out today: The queer discomforts of in-depth interviewing. In: ComptonD.MeadowT.SchiltK. (eds), Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 126–139.
17.
CrenshawK (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1(8): 139–167.
18.
CresseyPG (2008) [1932] The Taxi-Dance Hall: A Sociological Study in Commercialized Recreation & City Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
CupplesJ (2002) The field as a landscape of desire: Sex and sexuality in geographical fieldwork. Area34(4): 382–390.
20.
DattaA (2008) Spatialising performance: masculinities and femininities in a ‘fragmented’ field. Gender, Place & Culture15(2): 189–204.
21.
DelanyS (1999) Times Square Red, Times Square Blue. New York: New York University Press.
22.
DiproseGThomasACRushtonR (2013) Desiring more: Complicating understandings of sexuality in research process. Area45(3): 292–298.
23.
DoanPL (2010) The tyranny of gendered spaces—Reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place & Culture17(5): 635–654.
24.
St DrakeCCaytonHR (2015) [1945] Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in A Northern City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Du BoisWEB (1996) [1899] The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26.
EnglandKVL (1994) Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Professional Geographer46(1): 80–89.
27.
FieldsJ (2016) The racialized erotics of participatory action research: A queer feminist understanding. Women’s Studies Quarterly44(3/4): 31–50.
28.
GhazianiA (2011) Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems58(1): 99–125.
29.
GhazianiA (2014a) Measuring urban sexual cultures. Theory and Society43(3/4): 371–393.
30.
GhazianiA (2014b) There Goes the Gayborhood?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31.
GhazianiABrimM (2019) Imagining Queer Methods. New York: New York University Press.
GrayM (2009) Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America. New York: New York University Press.
34.
GreeneT (2014) Gay neighborhoods and the rights of the vicarious citizen. City & Community13(2): 99–118.
35.
GreeneT (2019) Queer cultural archipelagos are new to us. City & Community18(1): 23–29.
36.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
37.
HarawayD (1991) Haraway D Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–181.A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century
38.
HardingS (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
39.
HartlessJ (2018) Questionably queer: Understanding straight presence in the post-gay bar. Journal of Homosexuality66(8): 1035–1057.
40.
HartsockN (1983) Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. New York: Longman.
41.
HennenP (2008) Faeries, Bears, and Leathermen: Men in Community Queering the Masculine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
HoangKK (2015) Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline, and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
43.
HoangKK (2018) Gendering carnal ethnography: A queer reception. In: ComptonDMeadowTSchiltK (eds), Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 230–245.
44.
HowardJ (1999) Men Like That: A Southern Queer History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
HumphreysL (1970) Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
46.
IrvineJM (2014) Is sexuality research ‘dirty work’? Institutionalized stigma in the production of sexual knowledge. Sexualities17(5/6): 632–656.
47.
IrvineJM (2015) The other sex work: Stigma in sexuality research. Social Currents2(2): 116–125.
48.
JacksonSScottS (2007) Faking like a woman: Towards an interpretivist theorization of sexual pleasure. Body and Society13(2): 95–116.
49.
JacksonSScottS (2010) Rehabilitating interactionism for a feminist sociology of sexuality. Sociology44(5): 811–826.
50.
JacksonSScottS (2017) Towards a practice theoretic analysis of sexuality. In: KingASantosACCrowhurstI (eds), Sexualities Research: Critical Interjections, Diverse Methodologies and Practical Applications. London: Routledge, pp. 70–82.
51.
JohnsonEP (2008) Sweet Tea: Black Gay Men of the South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
52.
JonesA (2018) Pornographics as queer method. In: ComptonD.MeadowT.SchiltK. (eds), Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 95–108.
53.
JonesRGJr (2015) Queering the body politic: Intersectional reflexivity in the body narratives of queer men. Qualitative Inquiry21(9): 766–775.
54.
KasparHLandoltS (2016) Flirting in the field: Shifting positionalities and power relations in innocuous sexualisations of research encounters. Gender, Place & Culture23(1): 107–119.
55.
KazyakE (2012) Midwest or lesbian? Gender, rurality, and sexuality. Gender & Society26(6): 825–848.
56.
KeithM (1992) Angry writing: (Re)presenting the unethical world of the ethnographer. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10: 551–568.
57.
KenwayJMcLeodJ (2004) Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: Whose reflexivity, which perspective?British Journal of Sociology of Education25(4): 525–544.
58.
KirschG (1999) Ethical Dilemmas in Feminist Research: The Politics of Location Interpretation, and Publication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
LauderLH (2017) An analysis of gentrification's effects on LGBTQ+ populations in Louisville. Undergraduate Thesis, University of Louisville, KY.
65.
LiddleK (2005) More than a bookstore. Journal of Lesbian Studies9(1/2): 145–159.
66.
LyonsTKrüsiAPierreL, et al (2017) The impact of construction and gentrification on an outdoor trans sex work environment: Violence, displacement and policing. Sexualities20(8): 881–903.
67.
McDonaldJ (2013) Coming out in the field: A queer reflexive account of shifting researcher identity. Management Learning44(2): 127–143.
68.
McDonaldJ (2015) Expanding queer reflexivity: The closet as a guiding metaphor for reflexive practice. Management Learning47(4): 391–406.
69.
MayR (2018) Velvet rope racism, racial paranoia, and cultural scripts: Alleged dress code discrimination in urban nightlife, 2000–2014. City & Community17(1): 44–64.
70.
McCorkelJAMyersK (2003) What difference does difference make? Position and privilege in the field. Qualitative Sociology26(2): 199–231.
71.
MeadowT (2018) The mess: Vulnerability as ethnographic practice. In: ComptonDMeadowTSchiltK (eds), Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 154–166.
72.
NashCJ (2011) Trans experiences in lesbian and queer space. The Canadian Geographer55(2): 192–207.
73.
NashCJBainA (2007) ‘Reclaiming raunch’? Spatializing queer identities at Toronto women’s bathhouse events. Social & Cultural Geography8(1): 47–62.
74.
NastHJ (1994) Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. Professional Geographer46(1): 54–66.
75.
NguyenTH (2014) A View from the Bottom: Asian American Masculinity and Sexual Representation. Durham: Duke University Press.
76.
OrneJ (2017) Boystown: Sex & Community in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77.
PaulsenK (2009) Ethnography of the ephemeral: Studying temporary scenes through individual and collective approaches. Social Identities15(4): 509–524.
78.
Pitts-TaylorV (2015) A feminist carnal sociology?: Embodiment in sociology, feminism, and naturalized philosophy. Qualitative Sociology38(1): 19–25.
79.
RogersB (2018) Drag as a resource: Trans* and nonbinary individuals in the southeastern United States. Gender & Society32(6): 889–910.
80.
RookeA (2009) Queer in the field: On emotions, temporality, and performativity in ethnography. Journal of Lesbian Studies13(2): 149–160.
81.
RoseG (1997) Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography21(3): 305–320.
82.
RuppLTaylorV (2003) Drag Queens at the 801 Cabaret. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
SchorowS (2017) Inside the Combat Zone: The Stripped Down Story of Boston’s Most Notorious Neighborhood. Boston: Union Park Press.
84.
SkeggsB (2001) Feminist ethnography. In: AtkinsonPCoffeyASaraD, et al (eds), Handbook of Ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 426–442.
85.
SmithD (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
86.
SilvaT (2017) Constructing normative masculinity among rural straight men that have sex with men. Gender & Society31(1): 51–73.
87.
StaceyJ (1988) Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women’s Studies International Forum11(1): 21–27.
88.
StanleyLWiseS (2002) Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. 2nd online edition. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Group.
89.
StoneA (2013) Flexible queers, serious bodies: Transgender inclusion in queer spaces. Journal of Homosexuality60(12): 1647–1665.
90.
StoneA (2016) Crowning King Anchovy: Cold War gay visibility in San Antonio’s urban festival. Journal of the History of Sexuality25(2): 297–322.
91.
StoneA (2018) The geography of research on LGBTQ life: Why sociologists should study the South, rural queers, and ordinary cities. Sociology Compass12(11).
92.
TangD (2011) Conditional Spaces: Hong Kong Lesbian Desire and Everyday Life. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
93.
United States Census Bureau (1994) Geographic Areas Reference Manual. Washington D.C.: United States Department of Commerce. Chapter 13. Available at:https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/GARM/Ch13GARM.pdf ((accessed on 25 January 2021).Metropolitan Areas
