Critical ethnographic inquiry demands flux in the researcher’s positionality in a double sense. The first is in its attempts to interweave the micro with macro structures of power and domination, demanding a multi-sited aspect, in sensibility as much as locality. The second, following the reflexive turn, is to dismantle the violence of epistemological realism through turning one’s analytical tools onto one’s Self. This turn spotlights the fluidity and ambiguity of one’s identity, disruptive of and disrupted by relations in the ‘field’. Whilst critical inquiry often aspires to emancipate the Self as well as Others, the toll of multipositionality in the field should not be taken lightly. Critical inquiry and its arsenal, of which ethnography forms an integral part, demands a dynamism that can indeed liberate but also incarcerate, without due attention. An honest and reflexive conversation about the emotional and psychological demands of such research is long overdue.
Aberese-AkoM (2017) ‘
I won’t take part!’: Exploring the multiple identities of the ethnographer in two Ghanaian hospitals.Ethnography18(3): 300–321.
2.
AdlerEPouliotV (2011)
International practices.International Theory3(1): 1–36.
3.
AnthiasF (2013)
Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis.Ethnicities13(1): 3–19.
4.
AppaduraiA (1991) Global ethnoscapes: Notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. In: FoxRG (ed.) Recapturing Anthropology.
Santa Fe, NM:
School of American Research Press.
5.
AppaduraiA (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
6.
ArcherMS (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
7.
ArcherMS (2012) The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
8.
AtackI (1999)
Four criteria of development NGO legitimacy.World Development27(5): 855–864.
9.
Barker R (2001) Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Rulers and Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BennerTReinickeWHWitteJM (2004)
Multisectoral networks in global governance: Towards a pluralistic system of accountability.Government and Opposition39(2): 191–210.
11.
BhabhaHK (1996) Culture’s in-between. In: HallSDu GayP (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity.
London:
SAGE.
12.
BlaunerRWellmanD (1973) Toward the decolonization of social research. In: LadnerJA (ed.) The Death of White Sociology.
New York:
Vintage Books, pp. 310–330.
13.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
14.
BourdieuP (1984a) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15.
BourdieuP (1984b) Homo academicus.
Paris:
Éditions de Minuit.
16.
BourdieuP (1985)
The social space and the genesis of groups.Theory and Society14(6): 723–744.
17.
BourdieuP (1987) Legitimation and structured interests in Weber’s sociology of religion. In: WhimsterSLashS (eds) Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity.
London:
Routledge, pp. 119–137.
18.
BrahAPhoenixA (2004)
Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies5(3): 75–86.
19.
BrayboyBMDeyhleD (2000)
Insider-outsider: Researchers in American Indian communities.Theory into Practice39(3): 163–169.
20.
BrownW (1997)
The impossibility of women’s studies. differences:a journal of feminist cultural studies9(3): 79–101.
21.
BulkeleyH (2012)
Governance and the geography of authority: Modalities of authorisation and the transnational governing of climate change.Environment and Planning A44(10): 2428–2444.
22.
CannellaGS (2015) Introduction: Engaging critical qualitative science. In: CannellaGSSalazar PérezMSPasquePA (eds) Critical Qualitative Inquiry: Foundations and Futures. Walnut Grove,
CA:
Left Coast Print, pp. 7–28.
23.
CliffordJ (1986) Introduction: Partial truths. In: CliffordJMarcusGE (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography.
Berkeley:
University of California Press, pp. 1–26.
24.
CliffordJMarcusGE (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
25.
CollierSJOngA (2005) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems.
Malden, MA:
Blackwell.
26.
CollingwoodV (2006)
Non-governmental organisations, power and legitimacy in international society.Review of International Studies32(3): 439–454.
27.
ComaroffJComaroffJ (2003)
Ethnography on an awkward scale: Postcolonial anthropology and the violence of abstraction. Ethnography4(2): 147–179.
28.
CoxR (1981)
Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory.Millennium: Journal of International Studies10(2): 126–155.
29.
CrenshawK (1989)
Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1989(1): 139–167.
30.
CrenshawK (1995) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In: CrenshawKGotandaNPellerGThomasK (eds) Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York:The New Press, pp. 357–383.
31.
DelgadoR (2011)
Rodrigo’s reconsideration: Intersectionality and the future of critical race theory. Iowa Law Review96: 1247–1288.
32.
DenzinNK (1992)
Whose Cornerville is it, anyway?Journal of Contemporary Ethnography21: 120–132.
33.
DhamoonRK (2011)
Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality.Political Research Quarterly64(1): 230–243.
34.
Dodworth K (2014) NGO legitimation as practice: working state capital in Tanzania. Critical African Studies 6(1): 22–39.
35.
Dodworth K (2017) Multipositionality in the “field’. In: Understanding Global Development Research: Fieldwork Issues, Experiences and Reflections. SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 213–216.
36.
DubashNK (2009)
Global norms through global deliberation? Reflections on the World Commission on Dams. Global Governance 15(
2): 219–238.
37.
Duncombe J and Jessop J (2002) ‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’. In: Ethics in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 107–122.
38.
EdwardsM (2000) NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance.
London:
Foreign Policy Centre in association with NCVO.
39.
FergusonJGuptaA (2002)
Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality.American Ethnologist29(4): 981–1002.
40.
FoucaultM (1970) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences..
London:
Tavistock Publications.
41.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
New York:
Pantheon Books.
42.
FoucaultM (1979) The History of Sexuality.
London:
Penguin.
43.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France,1977–79, trans. Burchell G, ed. Davidson A. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
GelsthorpeL (1992)
Response to Martyn Hammersley’s paper ‘On Feminist Methodology’.Sociology26(2): 213–218.
45.
GordenkerLWeissTG (1995)
Pluralising global governance: Analytical approaches and dimensions.Third World Quarterly16(3): 357–387.
46.
GourevitchPALakeDAGross SteinJ (2012) The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue Is Not Enough.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
GrzybowskiC (2000)
We NGOs: A controversial way of being and acting.Development in Practice10(3/4):436–444.
49.
GuptaAFergusonJ (1992)
Beyond ‘culture’: Space, identity, and the politics of difference.Cultural Anthropology7(1): 6–23.
50.
GuptaASharmaA (2006)
Globalization and postcolonial states.Current Anthropology47(2): 277–307.
51.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (2010) Ethnography: Principles in Practice.
London:
Routledge.
52.
HancockA-M (2007)
When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm.Perspectives on Politics5(1): 63–79.
53.
HarawayD (1988)
Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.
54.
HardingSG (1986) The Science Question in Feminism.
Milton Keynes:
Open University Press.
55.
HareN (1965) The Black Anglo-Saxons.
New York:
Marzani & Munsell.
56.
HarveyL (1990) Critical Social Research.
London:
Unwin Hyman.
57.
HolmesDRMarcusGE (2005) Refunctioning ethnography: The challenge of an anthropology of the contemporary. In: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 1099–1113.
58.
KingDK (1988)
Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology.Signs14(1): 42–72.
59.
KondoDK (1986)
Dissolution and reconstitution of self: Implications for anthropological epistemology.Cultural Anthropology1(1): 74–88.
60.
LakeDA (2010)
Rightful rules: Authority, order, and the foundations of global governance.International Studies Quarterly54(3): 587–613.
61.
LuffD (1999)
Dialogue across the divides: ‘Moments of rapport’ and power in feminist research with anti-feminist women.Sociology33(4): 687–703.
62.
LundC (2006)
Twilight institutions: An introduction.Development and Change37(4): 673–684.
63.
MarcusGE (1995)
Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography.Annual Review of Anthropology24: 95–117.
64.
MarcusGEFischerMMJ (1986) Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
65.
McCall L (2005) The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs 30(3): 1771–1800.
66.
MercerCGreenM (2013)
Making civil society work: Contracting, cosmopolitanism and community development in Tanzania.Geoforum45: 106–115.
67.
MercerJ (2007)
The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas.Oxford Review of Education33(1): 1–17.
68.
MertonRK (1972)
Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge.American Journal of Sociology78(1): 9–47.
69.
MooreJW (1973)
Social constraints on sociological knowledge: Academics and research concerning minorities.Social Problems21(1): 65–77.
70.
Mosse D and Kruckenberg LJ (2017) Beyond the ivory tower: researching development practice. In: Understanding Global Development Research: Fieldwork Issues, Experiences and Reflections. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 193–212.
71.
NaplesNA (1996)
A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The ‘outsider phenomenon’ in rural Iowa.Qualitative Sociology19(1): 83–106.
72.
NarayanK (1993)
How native is a native anthropologist?American Anthropologist95(3): 671–686.
73.
NelsonPJ (2002) Agendas, accountability and legitimacy among transnational networks: Lobbying the World Bank. In: KhagramSRikerJVSikkinkK (eds) Restructuring World Politics.
Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, pp. 131–154.
74.
OakleyA (1981) Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In: RobertsH (ed.) DoingFeminist Research.
London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 30–61.
75.
OssewaardeRNijhofAHeyseL (2008)
Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organising betrays core missions of INGOs.Public Administration and Development28(1): 42–53.
76.
PerrymanJ (2011)
The return of the native: The blurred boundaries of insider/outsider research in an English secondary school.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education24(7): 857–874.
77.
SassenS (2006) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
78.
SlimH (2002) By what authority? The legitimacy and accountability of non-governmental organisations. In: ‘International Meeting on Global Trends and Human Rights – Before and after September 11’, Geneva, 10–12 January 2002. International Council of Human Rights Policy. Available at: http://www.gdrc.org/ngo/accountability/by-what-authority.html (accessed 17 September 2018).
79.
SmithDE (1988) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology.
Milton Keynes:
Open University Press.
80.
SmoothW (2006)
Intersectionality in electoral politics: A mess worth making.Politics & Gender2(3): 400–414.
81.
StaceyJ (1988)
Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’sStudies International Forum11(1): 21–27.
82.
StanleyLWiseS (1990) Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In: StanleyL (ed.) Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology.
London:
Routledge, pp. 20–60.
83.
WeberM (1968) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology.
New York:
Bedminster Press.
84.
WeberM (1970) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated, edited and with an introduction by Gerth HH and Mills CW. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
85.
WebsterJPJohnTA (2010)
Preserving a space for cross-cultural collaborations: An account of insider/outsider issues.Ethnography and Education5(2): 175–191.
86.
Wind G (2008) Negotiated interactive observation: doing fieldwork in hospital settings. Anthropology & Medicine 15(2): 79–89.
87.
ZinnMB (1979)
Field research in minority communities: Ethical, methodological and political observations by an insider.Social Problems27(2): 209–219.
