This article examines how class and gender hierarchies are reproduced through spatial dynamics among affluent golfers in contemporary Mexico City, using the concepts of collective visibility and invisibility. The analysis focuses on how class and gender principles make some sites and actions visible while reducing the perceptibility of other spaces and acts. To do so, the article addresses three questions: to what extent and in what ways are privileged social spaces, like golf clubs, exclusively organized by class principles? How do Mexican golfers understand the class and gender principles operating in golf clubs? And, how do multiple axes of differences inform space and spatial practices? The study is based on an ethnography of three up-scale golf clubs and 58 in-depth interviews with members of the golfing community, including club members, instructors, caddies, and golf journalists in Mexico City.
AnMSageG (1992) The golf boom in South Korea. Sociology of Sport Journal9(4): 372–384.
4.
AtkinsonABrandoliniA (2014) On the identification of the middle class. In: GornickJ (ed.) Income Inequality, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 77–100.
5.
Baltzell E Digby (1985) Philadelphia Gentlemen: The Making of a National Upper Class. Glencoe: Free Press.
6.
BellMM (1997) The ghosts of place. Theory and Society26(6): 813–836.
7.
BourdieuP (1962) The Algerians, Boston: Beacon Press.
8.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
CaldeiraT (2000) City of Walls, Berkley: University of California Press.
10.
Cattani D (ed.) (2009) Riqueza e Desigualdad na América Latina. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Zouk.
Ceron-Anaya H (2010) Golf, Habitus y Elites: La Historia Del Golf En México (1900–1980). Esport e Sociedade 5(15): 1–27.
13.
Ceron-AnayaH (2017) Not everybody is a golfer: Bourdieu and affluent bodies in Mexico. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography46(3): 285–309.
14.
CockJ (2008) Caddies and ‘cronies’: Golf and changing patterns of exclusion and inclusion in post-apartheid South Africa. South African Review of Sociology39(2): 183–200.
15.
ContiJO’NeilM (2007) Studying power: Qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research7(1): 63–82.
16.
CreweLMartinA (2016) Looking at luxury: Consuming luxury fashion in global cities. In: HayIBeaverstockJ (eds) Handbook on Wealth and the Super-Rich, London: Edward Elgar.
17.
DeenerA (2010) The ‘black section’ of the neighborhood: Collective visibility and collective invisibility as sources of place identity. Ethnography11(1): 45–67.
18.
Dinzey-FloresZ (2013) Gated communities for the rich and the poor. Contexts12(4): 24–29.
19.
DonaldsonMPoyntingS (2007) Ruling Class Men, London: Peter Lang.
GalliherJ (1973) The protection of human subjects: A reexamination of the professional code of ethics. The American Sociologist8(3): 93–100.
22.
Gaztambide-FernándezR (2015) Elite entanglements and the demand for a radically un/ethical position. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education28(9): 1129–47.
GerthK (2011) Lifestyles of the rich and infamous: The creation and implications of China’s new aristocracy. Comparative Sociology10(4): 488–507.
25.
GewertzDErringtonF (1999) Emerging Class in Papua New Guinea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GierynTF (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology26(1): 463–496.
27.
HarveyD (1989) The Urban Experience, Baltimore: Johns Hopkinks University Press.
28.
HayIMullerS (2012) ‘That tiny, stratospheric apex that owns most of the world’: Exploring geographies of the super-rich. Geographical Research50(1): 75–88.
29.
HaydenD (1998) Making women’s history visible in the urban landscape. City & Society10(1): 9–20.
30.
HirschP (1995) Tales from the field: Learning from researchers’ accounts. In: HertzRImberJ (eds) Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
Hirst D (2001) The emirs in the internet era: Dubai, a sheikhdom happy to embrace globalization. Le Monde Diplomatique (English Version), February.
32.
HoffmanJE (1980) Problems of access in the study of social elites and boards of directors. In: ShaffirWStebbinsE (eds) Field Work Experience, New York: St. Martins.
33.
HundleyH (2004) Keeping the acore: The hegemonic everyday practices in golf. Communication Reports17(1): 39–48.
34.
KendallD (2008) Members Only, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
KhanS (2010) Privilege, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36.
KohSWissinkBForrestR (2016) Reconsidering the super-rich. In: HayIBeaverstockJ (eds) Handbook on Wealth and the Super-Rich, London: Edward Elgar.
37.
LamontM (1992) Money, Morals, and Manners, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space, New York: Oxford Blackwell.
39.
LiconaAMaldonadoM (2014) The social production of Latin: Visibilities and invisibilities. Antipode46(2): 517–536.
40.
LowS (2001) The edge and the center: Gated communities and the discourse of urban fear. American Anthropologist103(1): 45–58.
41.
LowersonJ (1995) Sport and the English Middle Classes, 1870–1914, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
42.
MarcusGMascarenhasF (2005) Ocasião: The Marquis and the Anthropologist, a Collaboration, Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
43.
Massey D (1992) Politics and space/time. New Left Review I/196 (November–December).
44.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place, and Gender, Cambridge: Polity Press.
45.
MaxwellCAggletonP (2010) The bubble of privilege. Young, privately educated women talk about social class. British Journal of Sociology of Education31(1): 3–15.
46.
McGinnisLMcQuillanJChappleC (2005) ‘I just want to play’: Women, sexism, and persistence in golf. Journal of Sport & Social Issues29(3): 313–337.
47.
MossR (2001) Golf and the American Country Club, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
48.
NaderL (1972) Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. In: HymesD (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, New York: Pantheon, 284–311.
49.
NutiniH (2008) The Mexican Aristocracy, Austin: University of Texas Press.
OstranderS (1993) ‘Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful’: Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography22(1): 7–27.
52.
OstranderS (2010) Women of the Upper Class, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
53.
ParadisE (2012) Boxers, briefs or bras? Bodies, gender and change in the boxing gym. Body & Society18(2): 82–109.
54.
PierceJ (1995) Reflections of fieldwork in a complex organization. In: HertzRImberJ (eds) Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
PowC-P (2017) Elite informality, spaces of exception and the super-rich in Singapore. In: ForrestRKohSWissinkB (eds) Cities and the Super-Rich: Real Estate, Elite Practices and Urban Political Economies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–228.
Rodriguez D (2014) Golf, ¿Un deporte sólo para ricos? El Financiero (Mexico), 25 February.
60.
Saliba A (2003) Hitting the tropical links: Growth of golf stunted by heavy price tag. Business Mexico, 1 July.
61.
SalverdaT (2011) Embodied signs of elite distinction: Franco-Mauritians’ white skin-colour in the face of change. Comparative Sociology10(4): 548–570.
62.
SalverdaTHayI (2014) Change, anxiety and exclusion in the post-colonial reconfiguration of Franco-Mauritian elite geographies. The Geographical Journal180(3): 236–245.
