This article problematizes the ethnography of process with respect to civic engagement and political subjectivity. Process is approached in a two-pronged sense: as a target of ethnographic/phenomenological discovery and as a place-based issue particular to the US. Regarding the first sense, I examine the dialogic emergence of political subjectivity in specific communication contexts. Concurrently, I raise epistemological questions about the power of words to name states and processes of civic-being. Regarding the second sense, I argue that the experience, expression, and investigation of political subjectivity in the US is informed and hampered by a political/discursive culture that emphasizes discrete ‘engagement measures’ and ‘decisive stances’ over processes. Interweaving these two prongs together, I argue for greater experimentation with re-presentational forms that excavate and regenerate processes of civic engagement and political subjectivity. Data stem from ethnographic and theatrical work with young adults in Atlanta and national survey instruments designed to measure ‘engagement’.
AhearnLM (2012) Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology, Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
2.
Bakhtin MM (1981 [1934–5]) Discourse in the novel. In: Holquist M (ed.) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, trans. Holquist M and Emerson C. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 259–422.
BourdieuP (1979 [1972]) Public opinion does not exist. In: MattelartASiegelaubS (eds) Communication and Class Struggle(Vol. 1), New York: International General, pp. 124–130.
5.
Bourdieu P (1988) Homo Academicus, trans. Collier P. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
6.
BrightmanR (1995) Forget culture: Replacement, transcendence, relexification. Cultural Anthropology10(4): 509–546.
7.
CerwonkaAMalkkiL (2007) Improvising Theory: Process and Temporality in Ethnographic Fieldwork, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
ColeyRJSumAM (2012) Fault Lines in Our Democracy: Civic Knowledge, Voting Behavior and Civic Engagement in the United States, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing ServiceAvailable at: http://www.ets.org/s/research/19386/.
9.
CouldryNLivingstoneSMarkhamT (2009) Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
DahlgrenP (2003) Reconfiguring civic culture in the new media milieu. In: CornerJPelsD (eds) Media and the Restyling of Politics, London: Sage, pp. 151–170.
11.
DesjarlaisRThroopCJ (2011) Phenomenological approaches in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology40: 87–102.
12.
EliasophN (1998) Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Evans-PritchardEE (1962) Social Anthropology and Other Essays, New York: Free Press.
14.
GraeberD (2009) Direct Action: An Ethnography, Oakland, CA: AK Press.
15.
HeideggerM (1982 [1959]) On the Way to Language, San Francisco: Harper.
16.
JanesickV (2000) The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations and crystallizations. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. London: Sage, pp. 379–400.
17.
KatzJCsordasTJ (2003) Phenomenological ethnography in sociology and anthropology. Ethnography4: 275–288.
KeaneW (2003) Self-interpretation, agency and the objects of anthropology: Reflections on a Genealogy. Comparative Study of Society and History45(2): 222–248.
20.
KortenD (1998) Globalizing Civil Society: Reclaiming Our Right to Power, New York: Seven Stories Press.
21.
OrtnerS (2006) Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power and the Acting Subject, Durham: Duke University Press.
Rosaldo R (1993 [1989]) The erosion of classic norms. In: Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 25–45.
26.
SilversteinM (1998) Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology27: 401–426.
27.
SpitulnikD (2002) Accessing ‘local’ modernities: Reflections on the place of linguistic evidence in ethnography. In: KnauftB (eds) Critically Modern: Alterities, Alternatives, Anthropologies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 194–219.
28.
SpitulnikD (2010) Thick context, deep epistemology: A meditation on wide-angle lenses on media, knowledge production and the concept of culture. In: BräuchlerBPostillJ (eds) Theorising Media and Practice, Oxford: Berghan, pp. 105–126.
29.
Torney-PurtaJV (2009) International research that matters for policy and practice. American Psychologist64(8): 822–837.
30.
VidaliDS (2010) Millennial encounters with mainstream television news: Excess, void and points of engagement. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology20(2): 372–388.
