This article reflects on the methodological challenges and opportunities of 20 years of research on Chinese migrants abroad against a shifting background of global politics and academic institutions. It suggests that, while ethnography is always implicitly comparative, juxtaposition rather than comparison in time and space, within and outside the ‘field’, may be a better way of describing the cumulative working of ethnographic research. I reflect on three ethnographic moments whose significance only became clear in hindsight, with the benefit of juxtapositions with other experiences, both academic and non-academic.
BaschLSchillerNGBlancCS (1993) Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments and Deterritorialized Nation-States. New York: Gordon & Breach.
2.
Blumenfield T (2011) Educational NGOs and Cultural Branding in a Northwest Yunnan Tourist Zone. Paper presented at the AAS-ICAS joint conference, Honolulu, 3 April.
3.
BourdariasF (2010) Chinese migrants and society in Mali: Local constructions of globalization. African and Asian Studies. 9(3): 269–285.
4.
BrosiusJPCampbellLM (2010) Collaborative event ethnography: Conservation and development trade-offs at the fourth world conservation congress. Conservation & Society. 8(4): 245–255.
5.
BunzlM (2008) The quest for anthropological relevance: Borgesian maps and epistemological pitfalls. American Anthropologist. 110(1): 53–60.
6.
CerwonkaAMalkkiLH (2007) Improvising Theory: Process and Temporality in Ethnographic Fieldwork. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
ComaroffJComaroffJ (2003) Ethnography on an awkward scale: Postcolonial anthropology and the violence of abstraction. Ethnography. 4(2): 147–179.
8.
DoblerG (2009) Chinese shops and the formation of a Chinese expatriate community in Namibia. The China Quarterly. 199: 707–727.
9.
Faming M (2011) Social and Cultural Mobility: Chinese Language (Volunteers) Teachers in Laos. Paper presented at the AAS-ICAS joint conference, Honolulu, 3 April.
10.
FongVL (2004) Only Hope: Coming of Age under China’s One-child Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11.
FongVL (2011) Paradise Redefined: Transnational Chinese Students and the Quest for Flexible Citizenship in the Developed World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
Gay y BlascoPWardleH (2007) How to Read Ethnography. Abingdon: Routledge.
13.
GeertzC (1988) Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14.
GomezETBentonG (2011) Transnationalism misapplied: Reconciling empirical evidence and theory. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 34(5): 870–878.
15.
HannerzU(2006) Studying down, up, sideways, through, backwards, forwards, away and at home: Reflections on the field worries of an expansive discipline. In: ColemanSCollinsPJ (ed.) Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology. Oxford: Berg, pp. 23–41.
16.
JurisJS (2008) Networking Futures: The Movements against Corporate Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
KernenA (2010) Small and medium-sized Chinese businesses in Mali and Senegal. African and Asian Studies. 9(3): 252–268.
18.
Lausent-HerreraI(2009) Tusans (tusheng) and the changing Chinese community in Peru. In: LaiWLTanCB (eds) The Chinese in Latin America and the Caribbean. Leiden: Brill, pp. 143–184.
19.
MarcusGE (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 24: 95–117.
20.
MarcusGEFischerMJ (1986) Anthropology as a Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Matsutake Worlds Research Group (2009) A new form of collaboration in cultural anthropology: Matsutake worlds. American Ethnologist. 36(2): 380–403.
22.
Ngô TTT (2011) The New Way: Becoming Protestant Hmong in Contemporary Vietnam. PhD Dissertation, Department of Social Anthropology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
23.
NyíriP (1999) New Chinese Migrants in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
24.
NyíriP (2007) Chinese in Russia and Eastern Europe: A Middleman Minority in a Transnational Era. Abingdon: Routledge.
25.
NyíriPZhangJ (with Varrall M) (2010) China’s cosmopolitan nationalists: ‘Heroes’ and ‘traitors’ of the 2008 Olympics. The China Journal. 63: 25–55.
26.
Østbø HaugenHCarlingJ (2005) On the edge of the Chinese diaspora: The surge of Baihuo business in an African city. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 28(4): 639–662.
27.
ScheinL(2002) Mapping Hmong media in diasporic space. In: GinsburgFDAbu-LughodLLarkinB (eds) Media World: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 229–245.
28.
Scheper-HughesN (1990) Difference and danger: The cultural dynamics of childhood stigma, rejection, and rescue. Cleft Palate Journal. 27(3): 301–306.
Tjon Sie FatPB(2010) Old migrants, new immigration and anti-Chinese discourse in Suriname. In: LaiWLTanCB (eds) The Chinese in Latin America and the Caribbean. Leiden: Brill, pp. 185–210.
31.
Van der VeerP(2002) Colonial cosmopolitanism. In: VertovecSCohenR (eds) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–180.
32.
WatsonJL (1975) Emigration and the Chinese Lineage: The Mans in Hong Kong and London. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
WestbrookDA (2008) Navigators of the Contemporary: Why Ethnography Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Xiang B (2011) Email correspondence with author about this chapter; 6 and 9 May.
35.
Yang GB (2011) Wanglou shijian zhong de qinggan dongyuan (Emotional mobilization in online events), Yiwuyishi 19. Available at: http://www.my1510.cn (accessed 12 August 2011).
36.
Yang M (2012) Zhongmian shuidian anzhan (Sino-Burmese shadow war over hydropower), Bloomberg Businessweek Chinese edition, 9 March. Reposted on http://bluesbeijing.blog.sohu.com/206216460.html (accessed 23 March 2012).
