‘Denial of the victim’ is one of the five classic techniques described by Sykes and Matza in their seminal work on techniques of neutralization. Based on ethnographic field work in a Norwegian remand prison, this article explores this particular technique as it is employed by prisoners in their narratives about how they came to be imprisoned. I will argue that this particular technique of neutralization, understood by Sykes and Matza as part of the etiology of crime, might fruitfully be re-conceptualized as a Foucauldian technique of the self tailored to the specific context of the prison. As both moral space and rehabilitation technology, a prison positions its prisoners as ‘immoral others’ who should confess and repent. This ascription of low morality may in fact be seen as one of the pains of imprisonment. Given this, victims represent problems for prisoners, as ‘having’ a victim equals being someone who has hurt another. I will show the narrative strategies prisoners employ when they reconstruct themselves as moral subjects in relation to their victims.
CohenAK (1955) Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: The Free Press.
13.
CombessieP (2002) Marking the carceral boundary: Penal stigma in the long shadow of the prison. Ethnography. 3(4): 535–555.
14.
ComfortM (2008) Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
CresseyDR (1953) Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
16.
CreweB (2009) The Prisoner Society: Power, Adaptation, and Social Life in an English Prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
DaviesBHarréR(2001) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. In: WetherellMTaylorSYatesSJ (eds). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: SAGE.
18.
Edel M and Edel A (1959) Anthropology and Ethics. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
19.
FlynnTR (1985) Truth and subjectivation in the later Foucault. Journal of Philosophy. 82(10): 531–540.
20.
FoucaultM(1988) The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. In: BernauerJRasmussenD (eds). The Final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
FoucaultM (1990) The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality, Volume 3. London: Penguin.
22.
FoucaultM (1992) The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality, Volume 2. London: Penguin.
23.
FoucaultM (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
24.
FoucaultM(1997a) Subjectivity and truth. In: RabinowP (ed.) Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. New York: The New Press.
25.
FoucaultM(1997b) Technologies of the self. In: RabinowP (ed.) Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 1. New York: The New Press.
26.
FoucaultM(2000) The subject and power. In: FaubionJD (ed.) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 3. New York: The New Press.
27.
FoxKJ (1999a) Changing violent minds: Discursive correction and resistance in the cognitive treatment of violent offenders in prison. Social Problems. 46(1): 88–103.
28.
FoxKJ (1999b) Reproducing criminal types: Cognitive treatment for violent offenders in prison. Sociological Quarterly. 40(3): 435–453.
29.
Geertz C (1998) Deep hanging out. The New York Review of Books 45 (16, 22 October), 69.
30.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
HarréRvan LangenhoveL (1999) Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
JanowitzM(1991) The concept of social control. In: BurkJ (ed.) On Social Organization and Social Control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
JewkesY (2002) Captive Audience: Media, Masculinity and Power in Prisons. Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan.
34.
JohnsenB (2001) Sport, Masculinities and Power Relations in Prison. Oslo: Norwegian University of Sport and Physical Education.
35.
JohnsenBGranheimPK(2012) Prison size and the quality of life in Norwegian closed prisons in late modernity. In: UgelvikTDullumJ (eds). Penal Exceptionalism? Nordic Prison Policy and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
36.
KhawajaI (2005) Det selvkonstruerende menneske. Nordiske udkast: Tidsskrift for kritisk samfundsforskning. 33(1): 35–59.
37.
LandsheerJAten HartHKoxW (1994) Delinquent values and victim damage: Exploring the limits of neutralization theory. British Journal of Criminology. 34(1): 44–53.
38.
LieblingAPriceD (2001) The Prison Officer. Leyhill: Prison Service Journal.
39.
MarunaSCopesH(2005) What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
MathiesenT (1965) The Defences of the Weak: A Sociological Study of a Norwegian Correctional Institution. London: Tavistock.
41.
PhillipsCEarleR (2010) Reading difference differently? Identity, epistemology and prison ethnography. British Journal of Criminology. 50(2): 360–378.
42.
PrattJ (2008a) Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. The British Journal of Criminology. 48(2): 119–137.
43.
PrattJ (2008b) Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess: Part II: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future?The British Journal of Criminology. 48(3): 275–292.
44.
PresserL (2004) Violent offenders, moral selves: Constructing identities and accounts in the research interview. Social Problems. 51(1): 82–101.
45.
PresserL (2009) The narratives of offenders. Theoretical Criminology. 13(2): 177–200.
46.
RhodesLA (2004) Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
ScottMBLymanSM (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review. 33(1): 46–62.
48.
SmithPS(2012) A critical look at Scandinavian exceptionalism: Welfare state theories, penal populism, and prison conditions in Denmark and Scandinavia. In: UgelvikTDullumJ (eds). Penal Exceptionalism? Nordic Prison Policy and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
49.
SykesGM (1958) The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
SykesGMMatzaD (1957) Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review. 22(6): 664–670.
51.
SøndergaardDM (2002) Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education. 15(2): 187–204.
52.
TochH(1993) Good violence and bad violence: Self-presentations of aggressors through accounts and war stories. In: FelsonRBTedeschiJT (eds). Aggression and Violence: Social Interactionist Perspectives. Washington, DC: Americal Psychological Association.
53.
TopalliV (2005) When being good is bad: An expansion of neutralization theory. Criminology. 43(3): 797–835.
54.
Ugelvik T (2011a) Fangenes friheter: Makt og motstand i et norsk fengsel [The liberties freedoms of prisoners: Power and resistance in a Norwegian prison]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
55.
Ugelvik T (2011b) Hva er et fengsel?: En analyse av manualen il en sosial teknologi [What is a prison?: An analysis of a social technology and its manual]. Retfard. Nordisk Juridisk Tidsskrift 34(1): s 85–100.
56.
WacquantLJD (2002) The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography. 3(4): 371–397.
57.
WaldramJ (2009) Challenges of prison ethnography. Anthropology News. 1: 4–5.
58.
WaldramJB (2007) Narrative and the construction of ‘truth’ in a prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders. Ethnography. 8(2): 145–169.
