Existing research about the role of the habitus in social change emphasizes inertia. Individuals in new contexts are understood to face disadvantage, making disruption of a hierarchical status quo difficult. Recent theory regarding our ability to strategically change and use our bodily habits, however, suggests that the habitus may not be condemned to a purely conservative role. Here I examine a community of lindy hoppers who are re-shaping the collective body towards feminist ends. Control over bodies is essential to partner dance. However, these dancers revision the lead/follow dynamic. Instead of an active/passive binary, partners happily negotiate power. This negotiation is decidedly corporeal and cooperative and occurs spontaneously and constantly. My findings add empirical weight to theory regarding the role of the habitus in widespread social change, suggest that the habitus has emancipatory potential, and offer a template for how the habitus could be used by social movement actors.
Adkins L. ( 2004) Introduction, context and background. In: Adkins L and Skeggs B (eds) Feminism After Bourdieu. Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 3-18.
2.
Alexander J. ( 1995) The reality of reduction: The failed synthesis of Pierre Bourdieu. In: Alexander J (ed.) Fin de Siècle Social Theory. Relativism, Reduction, and the Problem of Reason. London/New York: Verso, 128-218.
3.
Bar-On Cohen E. ( 2006) Kime and the moving body: Somatic codes in Japanese martial arts. Body & Society12: 73-93.
4.
Boddy J. ( 1995) The body nearer the self. American Anthropology97: 134-137.
5.
Bourdieu P. ( 1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bourdieu P. ( 1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
Bourdieu P. ( 2000) Pascalian Meditations, trans. Nice R. Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Bourdieu P. ( 2001) Masculine Domination, trans. Nice R. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Bourdieu P. and Wacquant L. ( 1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Buchholz L. ( 2006) Bringing the body back into theory and methodology. Theoretical Sociology35: 481-490.
11.
Butler J. ( 1999) Performativity’s social magic. In: Shusterman R (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader . Oxford: Blackwell, 113-128.
12.
Card, A. ( 1998) ‘The ‘‘Great Articulation of the Inarticulate’’: Reading the Jazz Body in Australian and American Popular Culture in the 1960s’ , Journal of Australian Studies22: 18-28.
13.
Chambers C. ( 2005) Masculine domination, radical feminism and change. Feminist Theory6: 325-346.
14.
Crossley N. ( 2001) The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. London: SAGE.
15.
Crossley N. ( 2004) The circuit trainer’s habitus: Reflexive body techniques and the sociality of the workout. Body & Society10: 37-69.
16.
Crossley N. ( 2005) Mapping reflexive body techniques: On body modification and maintenance. Body & Society11: 1-35.
17.
Csordas T. ( 1993) Somatic modes of attention. Cultural Anthropology8: 135-156.
18.
Desmond M. ( 2006) Becoming a firefighter. Ethnography7: 387-421.
19.
Doane R. ( 2006) The habitus of dancing: Notes on the swing dance revival in New York City. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography35: 84-116.
20.
Fowler B. ( 2003) Reading Pierre Bourdieu’s Masculine Domination: Notes towards an inter-sectional analysis of gender, culture and class. Cultural Studies17: 408-494.
21.
Hancock BH ( 2007) Learning how to make life swing. Qualitative Sociology30: 113-133.
22.
Jenkins R. ( 1992) Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
23.
Krais B. ( 2006) Gender, sociological theory and Bourdieu’s sociology of practice. Theory, Culture & Society23: 119-134.
24.
Lawler S. ( 1999) ‘Getting out and getting away’: Women’s narratives of class mobility. Feminist Review63: 3-24.
25.
Malone J. ( 1996) Steppin’ on the Blues: The Visible Rhythms of African American Dance. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
McNay L. ( 1999) Gender, habitus and the field. Theory, Culture & Society16: 95-117.
27.
McRobbie A. ( 2004) Notes on ‘What Not to Wear’ and post-feminist symbolic violence. In: Adkins L and Skeggs B (eds) Feminism After Bourdieu. Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 99-109.
28.
Novack C. ( 1990) Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
29.
Picart C. ( 2002) Dancing through different worlds: An autoethnography of the interactive body and virtual emotions in ballroom dance. Qualitative Inquiry8: 348-361.
30.
Polhemus T. ( 1993) Dance, gender, and culture. In: Thomas H (ed.) Dance, Gender and Culture. New York: St Martin’s Press.
31.
Renshaw S. ( 2006) Postmodern swing dance and secondary adjustment: Identity as process. Symbolic Interaction29: 83-94.
32.
Savigliano M. ( 1995) Tango and the Political Economy of Passion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
Scheper-Hughes N. and Lock M. ( 1987) The mindful body: A prolegomen to future work in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly1: 6-41.
34.
Sewell Jr WH ( 1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation . The American Journal of Sociology98: 1-29.
35.
Shilling C. ( 1997) The undersocialised conception of the (embodied) agent in modern sociology. Sociology31: 737-755.
36.
Tarr J. ( 2008) Habit and conscious control: Ethnography and embodiment in the Alexander Technique. Ethnography9: 477-497.
37.
Wacquant L. ( 1995) Pugs at work: Bodily capital and bodily labour among professional boxers. Body & Society1: 65-93.
38.
Wacquant L. ( 2004a) Body and Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Wacquant L. ( 2004b) Following Pierre Bourdieu into the field. Ethnography5: 387-414.
40.
Walsh D. ( 1993) ‘Saturday Night Fever’: An ethnography of disco dancing. In: Thomas H (ed.) Dance, Gender and Culture. New York: St Martin’s Press, 112-118.
41.
Witz A. ( 2004) Anamnesis and amnesis in Bourdieu’s work: The case for a feminist anamnesis. In: Adkins L and Skeggs B (eds) Feminism After Bourdieu. Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 211-223.
